In The Name of Allah, The Most Beneficent, The Most Kind
Is this a Religious Discussion Forum?
If this is a religious discussion forum. Then we must understand the following three terms (1) religious (3) Discussion (3) forum
(1)Religious: Everybody is familiar to this term. Anything pertaining religion and beliefs comes under this topic.
(2)Discussion: to talk or write about a subject in detail, especially considering different ideas and opinions related to it. Or when people talk about something and tell each other their ideas or opinions
(3)Forum: a situation or meeting in which people can talk about a problem or matter especially of public interest. Or a place on the Internet where people can leave messages or discuss particular subjects with other people at the same time.
There are some other issues which come under this topic: I would invite the participants of the forum to discuss these issues under religious aspect. One participant can chose even one item and give comments on it. If it is already ducussed please refer to that thread for the new participants.
(1) Propose of a perticular thread.
(2) Initiator of the Discussion topic Or the owner of the topic thread and his responsibilities.
(3) Conclusions.
(4) What we learnt from the discussion.
(5) How to discuss matters.
(6) Level of knowledge of the participants and how to gauge it.
(7) Love, hate, Abuse, respect, disrespect, truth, lie and Tabara matters.
(8) Providing links and references from the same forum or from other websites of the internet.
(9) Re-cycling topics or answering FAQs (frequently asked Questions)
(10) Asking known issues again and again to spoil the environment. Or to irritate people.
(11) Running away from the topic after getting a solid/strong answer from the opponent without giving some final conclusion or final comments (mean leaving the topic and jump to some other issue)
(12) Benefit of participating in forums. Some solid result of the discussion.
I wasn't here for a while since topics keep being closed while they remain unanswered. If the admins believe some postings are not appropriate, then they should simply delete them. But closing a topic and not giving the other side the opportunity to respond is really not fair.
As for Inuit, you wrote a lot of nonsense, but failed to respond to my challenge. Namely to bring a single authentic narration that confirms your claims about Hind (ra) and of course four witnesses for that. What you came up with were nothing but lies from obscure sources, most of which were written even by Rafidi priests. I don't care whether you know if these guys were Rafida or not and I don't care if you don't know the difference between Shi'i narrators in Sahih Bukhari and Rafida, but I do care about exposing Rafidi lies and slander against a woman.
So I'm not surprised to see you trying to distract from the actual topic and posting lots of lies against Muawiyya (ra) as well. You can run, but not escape.
-------------x----------
Are you for real ???
You make it sound so important and sacred to what you want to say…
In all your post I see nothing but dis-respect to Wahidiayt, Akhri Kitaab [the final word] and "khatum-ul-nabooat on :saw:
:saw: last seremon from mount arafa, his instructions to his umma.
Yet ! you talk about your authors from the history who wrote what they wrote and Allah knows under which circumstances,their authenticity can not be 100% guranteed. Yet Quraan is a reality,and is final,protected by Allah :swt:
Rest is all crap and bull and is the reason for Fitna that we face today among muslim ranks.
I repeat again to you and all those who qoute some thing from the history that is attributed to Allah :swt: or :saw: and can not be autheticated or has the slightest doubt any where,“shame on all of you”
What could be more simpler than Islam and its teaching,but yet through the ages it has become a demon and heaven for suicide bomers who has no shame in killing muslims if needed,
Shame on you for not calling quits,
In the biggening of the post,a simple Asalam ul lakum :rehm: would have been fine and favourable to Allah and understandable to all others reading this,what does “AL” stands for in your nick..??
Its a narration of Arabic grammer and surley not cultral in Pakistan…
I hope you’r not a teacher some where,
Folks, is this a discussion on what makes up a good religious discussion forum, or are you guys simply continuing your sectarian I-will-not-agree-to-your-point-of-view-so-I-will-keep-posting-till-you-give-up-or-get-bored posts?
I dont know if there is a defined time for a thread or in how much in an old thread we can make a post. It's still unclear to me. However in a continues research work there should not be a time limit. Its just like poetry or art work; whenever they find something under that particular topic they use it or they try to put together. Sometime they put aside their work for years and years and re-start working on that again when they find something particular. Anyway there maybe some particular policy of the GupShup.
Brother ** bao bihari ** If you want to finish the discussion which was continued under Pillars of Islam thread you can come on my email address with the answer to my last post which I made before the thread being closed.
Sometime is seems to me like Pakistani Government policies which changes with every government. Instead of teaching them how to do. They set free to everybody to post everything and sometime they impose Marshal law.
The participants of the forum are not Ullema, not even they are students of certain religious schools. They work in other fields and professions and whenever they find time they want to spend time in religious discussions. As I wrote above the Initiator of the Discussion topic Or the owner of the topic thread and his responsibilities. ** He must be responsible for it. To keep it in on track and to write its final conclusions. If you see he is just disappeared or get busy in other threads. You can easy say that he ask questions to simple involve other people and to make them fight. Like the case **Abi Sufyan and Hind The initiator of the thread is just disappeared after asking the question. If he wants to learn the opinions of both school of thought he must have to post his own final conclusion. So we should understand this at least.
Admin can see, that no body agreed with me even no body care about the 12 points which I posted to improve the quality of this Religious forum.
