Reason: Firstly there are different types of herds … the ones that require my allegiance I will follow, but I will question as well. If a response to the question comes out to be acceptable I will follow with caution and assess the progress of the act and be ready to pull out any time I see that the response is not being fulfilled. This way I follow but keep my wits about me and follow without inhibition if I understand and accept the response - but will follow with inhibition if the response is less than satisfactory and/or I do not understand it … When the fruits of experience prove it true then next time I have less inhibition and less until it becomes second nature.
Other herds that do not require my allegiance I will not follow them and I may support them if the moment needs that to be the case, but I will not follow herds through emotional pressures - I do not like lynch mobs and will never herd in that direction - I consider such acts as a blatant surrendering of our human faculty of reason and makes us like animals.
Do I think outside the box?
Not often - but yes I have the ability to think outside the box …
The case described above is not thinking outside the box at all … The box is clear to see … going against the grain is not necessarily thinking outside the box … This explanation may be “out of the box” however …
**The way I want to operate is be the first to peel away from bad herds and be the first join good ones … Avoid travelling alone without a herd as much as possible, because strength is in numbers.
Just like day trading cut your losses and sell after clear downward indicators and don’t buy until a downward turn starts to move back up.
**It may result in lower returns but it mitigates the risk of potentially fatal losses
Med911: if its a secular herd with no backwardly people, sure.
ajazali: if its a sunni hanafi blahblahblah herd with no namehram women, sure.
rommel: herds have imprisoned morsi in egypt for cia but real herd is free and looking for a khalifa
psyah: Firstly there are different types of herds … the ones that require my allegiance I will follow, but I will question as well. If a response to the question comes out to be acceptable I will follow with caution and assess the progress of the act and be ready to pull out any time I see that the response is not being fulfilled. This way I follow but keep my wits about me and follow without inhibition if I understand and accept the response - but will follow with inhibition if the response is less than satisfactory and/or I do not understand it … When the fruits of experience prove it true then next time I have less inhibition and less until it becomes second nature.
southie: a herd with all forms of herds in it from 5000 years can be followed but any other herd is unfair. :halo:
teggy: ahlwan wa sahlan lal topi herd al follow bil fattoosh ul burp
queer: dont stop me from spreading my “do whatever you want” or “boundless mauj masti” psychology otherwise i will pollute GS with vulgar and gandi posts.