Maybe IK is right if half of this guy’s story is true. Please keep in mind that it comes from ML. Btw, apparently some videos will soon be released (?) to back up his story. Story as reported from last year.
Re: Is Sharif family a syndicated crime family?
Those who have lived in Punjab, know the extent sharifs can to for power. If you talk against this you are against democracy.
Re: Is Sharif family a syndicated crime family?
If this guy is lying sharifs should take him court ta k doohd ka doohd pani ka pani ho jai.
Re: Is Sharif family a syndicated crime family?
^^^ I think, video is proof enough. If Shareef family think what in video is concocted, they should take ARY to court. As for getting justice from court. no judge in Punjab can give justice against Shareef family. To know why, please read below:
From my understanding … Pakistan has broadly 3 types of people in politics.
Politicians who care, but they are very few and never came to power. They are mostly hit with all sorts of propaganda. As party, JI with some agenda and own thinking, did cared for people. MQM tried to work for people without agenda other than eradicating discrimination and bringing equality and progress in the country, but marginalised by collusion of traditional politicians and Shareef family. Imran (and TUQ) may take stand for the benefit of Pakistan and may succeed, mainly due to their ethnicity (from Lahore … North Punjab) and thus wider appeal across army, judges, bureaucracy and police (especially armed forces).
Leaving those politicians who care for Pakistan and Pakistanis aside, we have ‘traditional politicians’ and ‘Shareef family’.
Differences between Shareef family and traditional Pakistani politicians are: Even though both, traditional politicians and Shareef family consider themselves above law and people (awam) their farm animals … do all sort of tricks and make promises to fool the masses, there are big differences between them.
Traditional Pakistani politicians consider bureaucrats, judges, and police as their ‘paid servants’ (as they consider Pakistan as their colony and treasury as their purse) so they treat them as servants. These traditional politicians order them (whoever they can), abuse them, threaten them, make them obey using all means, but never bribe them, never make them sit along with them, and never make them partners in crime. As for people (awam), they are treated as farm animals, spendable entities, but to be taken care of as long as they are useful.
Shareef family consider bureaucrats, judges and police as their tools, factory foremen, and managers. So Shareef family bribe, misbehave, misuse, threaten, and abuse them. They even make some top bureaucrats, judges and police officers their partners in crimes (give them few shares in ‘Shareef Pakistan enterprise Limited’). Actually, if they think any lower ranking bureaucrat, judge, or police officer is their loyal servant than they do everything to bring him on top so that they can use him easily. As for people (awam) is concerned, Shareef family treat them as spendable farm animals and bonded labourers, whose wellbeing is to give more output and enriching them.
As for country, both politicians and Shareef family consider ‘Pakistan’ as a home to live, but not a home to sacrifice or live for the home (Pakistan). For these thugs, to survive in democracy, Pakistan needs an army of illiterate and dependent majority. Hence, both traditional politicians and Shareefs want Pakistani masses to stay uneducated, and Pakistan undeveloped, so that they can always rule Pakistan on backing of people's illiteracy and dependency.
For both of them, their personal interests, family, and wellbeing are above Pakistan, above future of Pakistan, and certainly far above than interest of People (awam). Both traditional politicians and Shareef family would not hesitate to sell Pakistan if they think it would benefit them.
For instance, Bhutto did everything to break (divide) Pakistan and eventually succeeded too, so that he could become Prime Minister of Pakistan and then exploit Pakistan as well as Pakistanis. Nawaz did for the safety of his personal financial wellbeing (safeguarding future business interests and foreign investments) when he sold-out Kargil to Clinton (who bought Kargil for India). Nawaz even wanted to sell out Pakistan nuclear capability but army stopped him, so he sacked army chief (Jahangir Karamat) at first opportunity and wanted to bring his loyal servant Zia-ud-din Butt (Musharraf was go in between) so that next time he can sell Pakistan easily. BB used to urge foreign countries to stop aid to Pakistan (Zia regime), so that Pakistan gets weak and Zia falls from power. Later, for her financial interest and to make USA happy she created Taliban. For financial benefit, she (and also Nawaz) even encouraged sectarian outfits in Pakistan so that they can get money in their personal accounts from USA and Saudi Arabia … both wanted to use sectarian division in Pakistan, to pressurise Iran and fight their war with Iran on Pakistani soil.