Re: Is Obama's victory ours?
Hamysha tasweer ka tareek rukh hi kion daikhte hain, ye log kissi ko hansta gata kion nahi daikh sakte:D
Re: Is Obama's victory ours?
Yes laugh, nobody is stopping you. But don't fool yourself at the same time! Laugh as a smart person, not an ignorant one. < That's what they say and that's what I believe too.
Re: Is Obama's victory ours?
Very interesting! I've been thinking about this for a while, I clearly can't see ANY Change for that country.
Hansna laugh ka meanining nahi de raha tha yahan I mean khushi = hansi or mera khiyal hai" ane wale dinon main kuch change nahi hone wala" soch ker dil msoos ke baith jane se behter hain achi tabdili ka khiyal ker ke dil khush ker lo do ghari ko.Gham ki ghari tu ani hi hai soch soch ker preshan ho ker kuch bane ga?
Pakistan main kuch bana jab Imran Khan or other leaders army action ke duain ker rahe the Nwaz shareef ko bhgane ko:D Kia mila? Andeshon main ghire rahu na khelo na khelne do:D when you are aware your tears will not make any difference laugh out loud"(like ignorant believe me laugh is a lot better then sara howa mu, chala howa dimagh and bhuna howa sir"
Re: Is Obama's victory ours?
Nobody is crying.
Living in false hope will lead nowhere. It will only make your kids' life miserable. So stop with the pretending to be happy. Change comes from within, from us, the people. Not some black illusion. Do not fool yourselves, that's all I am saying.
What I really think, people like Mumia Abu Jamal should run for presidency. He is more intelligent than Obama and more eloquent. :)
But that won't happen because there is NO freedom in America. Only false hope which is fed in the minds of the young. People like Abu Jamal are political prisoners, they can't speak out. Oh yes, racism is still strong in America!
From: [EMAIL=“[email protected]”]info.aq.com@gmail.com
To: [EMAIL=“[email protected]”][email protected]
Subject: PakNationalists - Obama & Downsizing Pakistan’s Military -
Ahmed Quraishi
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:51:03 +0500
And Now Downsizing Pakistan’s Military
By AHMED QURAISHI
Wednesday, 5 November 2008.
WWW.AHMEDQURAISHI.COM
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—So our people missed all the signs, trusted the Americans and never doubted for a second that our ally will do us in. Pakistan’s political and intelligence communities woke up late, discovering sometime late last year that our American ally has been working on bringing the war to Pakistan from the start. Knowing Pakistani strategic concerns, it installed a decidedly pro-India setup in Kabul to our west while cultivating India as a check from the east. Adm. Mike Mullen is even contemplating inviting the Indian army to Afghanistan to patrol our western border.
Ever wonder why the American drones attacking Pakistan are manned by CIA and not the U.S. military? That’s because there is a plan. And the plan now is to carefully eliminate pro-Pakistan Pashtun tribal leaders and leave Islamabad with a civil war and maybe a Pashtun separatism while the Americans allow themselves the right to offer peace to Mullah Omar in Afghanistan. Maybe the CIA is upset at Pakistani military’s recent successes against shadowy ‘Rebel Mullahs’ who only fight the Pakistani State and whose supplies never end. These are the same rebels that CIA drones have strangely been ignoring for the past year or so.
But our troubles appear to be only starting. Bruce Riedel, who retired from CIA in 2006, is Barrack Obama’s adviser on Pakistan. Such is his obsession with Pakistan that he wrote a memo to President Clinton in 1998 designating Pakistan as the most dangerous country in the world and recommending that it be fixed. Today, Mr. Riedel is preparing a President Obama for a war with Pakistan, camouflaged in the usual American doublespeak about freedom, terrorism and stability.
Figure 1: Bruce Riedel, Obama’s Pointman On Pakistan
Even some Americans are alarmed at the ideas of Mr. Obama’s pointman on Pakistan. This is how Thomas Houlahan, a Washington-based expert on Pakistani military affairs, described Mr. Riedel on Geo News over the weekend:
“Barrack Obama’s South Asia advisor Bruce Riedel is dangerously misinformed on Pakistan, sees the Pakistani army as the source of all evil in the [region], and thinks it needs to be cut down to size to essentially a glorified police force, which is essentially what they are talking about when they say we need to steer [Pakistani military] away from fighter jets and tanks and turn it into a counterterrorism force. And it doesn’t seem to occur to these geniuses that having a glorified police force with nuclear weapons might not be a good idea.”
No matter how harsh the political polarization in Washington, everyone seems to be on board on Pakistan: denuclearizing the country, forcing the Pakistani army to forget about Indian water blocking and Kashmir and restructure the army to fight insurgents and buy only those weapons that serve this purpose.
Mr. Obama is impressed with his adviser’s ideas. Over the weekend he picked another longtime Riedel theme: that resolving Kashmir is essential to fighting terrorism. But before someone in Islamabad gets excited about this, Mr. Riedel – and now his boss Mr. Obama – are basically talking about ending Pakistan’s excuse of the lingering dispute of Kashmir which stands in the way of accepting Washington’s desire to see India walk all over Pakistan, open direct trade links to Afghanistan and central Asia and play a major role in securing Afghanistan and the region in the face of Russian and Chinese influence.
To face the expected escalation in the U.S. war ‘expansion’ plans after the presidential election, Pakistan needs to start talking. And it needs to do this now. While Washington has the benefit of a loud and noisy media to convey its interest and expectations, Islamabad continues to be shy about speaking publicly and bluntly about what it wants. Pakistan is not sufficiently defending at a high level, that of President or Prime Minister, its right to protect its interests. Influential policy advisers like Mr. Riedel are effectively undermining Pakistani position by portraying Pakistani policy as ‘obsessive’ about India. What both Riedel and Pakistani officials are failing to highlight is that Pakistan has its own vision for peace in the region that includes Pakistan’s own interests. The Pakistani interest does not match that of Washington and New Delhi when it comes antagonizing Russia and China. Pakistani interest is also undermined by U.S. support for warlords and officials in the Karzai government who are too close to New Delhi and hostile toward Pakistan. And above all, our threat perception toward India is proving correct with the Indian blockade of Pakistani water flowing from Indian-controlled areas of Kashmir and the evidence that Washington is quite aware of now about Indian involvement in terrorism in southwest Pakistan.
We must tell our friends in Washington publicly and openly that Pakistan’s military orientation is our prerogative, not America’s.
Obama or McCain Does that make a difference? O yaar Hum Desi Pakistani ..hamein kia Kala Jeetay ya Goora.......
Don't get carried away....in urdu we have a saying : " Parayi Shadi may Abdullah Deewana"
Meaning: Abudullah was extra Jubiliant and gone made with happiness in somebody's else wedding.....it wasn't even his own wedding but he danced n danced.......and it looked as if he was the Groom when he wasn't.
So , Please don't become Abdullah........
Obama's victory means nothing to Second Generation or Frist Generation's Desies living in USA.
Oye rotti khao.....Naan khao with butter chicken and drink Mango Lassi
