Is Fauji Foundation legal?

FACTS:

  1. There’s no country in the world where a Foundation created by almost not worth mentioning Pay Roll Deduction of Military Personnel has become the biggest the biggest Business Conglamorate of that country, like has become Fauji Foundation.
  2. In no country an Arms Manufacturer or Services Provider to Military is run by former Military Personnel like in Pakistan.
  3. There’s no Military Foundation that owns from Cereal Manufacturing Industry, Biscuit Manufacturing Industry to Banks and Water Tanker Companies in a country, like in Pakistan.
  4. Fauji Foundation pays no Taxes or bribes to gain any contracts from Government of Pakistan and sometimes these contracts are not allowed to be contested by private Businesses of the country. No country does that.

— In Multiculturalism- PluralismGroup@ yahoogroups. com, Pak Alert Press <pakalert@…> wrote:

Ayesha Siddiqa’s MILITARY INC: A Deflective and Derogatory
Book<http://pakalert. wordpress. com/2008/ 10/24/ayesha- siddiqa-military -inc/>
http://pakalert. wordpress. com/2008/ 10/24/ayesha- siddiqa-military -inc/

<http://pakalert. wordpress. com/2008/ 10/24/ayesha- siddiqa-military -inc/#comments>

Written By: *Afreen Baig

Dr Ayesha Siddiqa’s ‘The Military Inc.’ is a book deflective of reality,
highly derogatory and against the very notion of sovereignty.

Dr Ayesha Siddiqa launches the book by giving the impression that her
intention is to cover the entrepreneurial activities of military worldwide.
However, in depth reading reaffirms suspicions that her book massively
targets the Pakistan Military and the top echelons of the Armed Forces, most
of which are based upon self serving assumptions and intentional
hoodwinking. A labyrinth of financial figures is presented to further
obscure the ordinary reader’s intelligence.

The book sets forward four arguments. First, that MILBUS (Military Business)
is military capital that perpetuates the military’s political predatory
style; and is kept concealed and includes questionable transfer of resources
from public sector to individuals connected with armed Forces. Second, the
military’s economic greed increases in totalitarian systems. Third, Military
convinces the citizens to bear additional costs for security on basis of
conceived threats to the State. Fourth, the book considers the Pakistan
Military the cause of all ills, social disparity and democratic fiasco.

Let’s start by setting the record straight. MILBUS in Pakistan - is the
result of honest intentions and visionary policies - to raise independent
resources, to self-finance the on-going national technological development,
to modernize strategic assets, and most importantly, the determination to
rely less on Foreign Aid. While at the same time, build facilities for
retired military personnel and their families; and slowly withdrawing from
National Defense budget allocation as a percentage of GDP.

MILBUS also exists in well developed countries like the USA, UK, France,
China, Israel or even Turkey. The Milbus or the PMEs (Private Military
Enterprises) are generally known as the Private Military Industry. Famous US
PMEs include Halliburton, Black-water worldwide, Defensecurity, Titan
Corporations, Kellogg Brown & Root, Air Scan, DynCorp’s, CACI International,
etc. Famous UK PMEs include Black-Op’s and Aegis Defense Services. Most of
these are active beneficiaries of the Iraq War. The worldwide PME industry
is now worth over $100 billion a year. Thus, this is not just a Pakistan
specific industry.

MILBUS in Pakistan is being criticized unnecessarily, with the sole
intention to malign the Armed Forces. The Pakistan military has never
intended to deliberately conceal their economic activities and they do not
cause injustice by weighing heavily on civilian corporate sector or
individual leaders.

The book ‘Military Inc’ is based upon a series of presumptions and false
accusations. Throughout her book, the author obstinately insists that the
growth of Military economy is the case of self interest and predatory
acquisition by senior officers, in which it allow the Generals to seek
benefit for themselves and their clients.

The author fails to provide, any concrete evidence that could confirm her
allegations, that questionable transfer of wealth is made to individuals
connected with armed forces. All she could give in example were the 500 sq
yard official plots given to the Generals at the end of their service, as
part of their benefits, and hence her assumption that a retired general is
worth from Rs.150 million to Rs.400 million.

Rarely do critics mention, that nominal deduction from the pay of all
military officers are made during their service, in return for a small
apartment or a small housing, which is handed over at the time of their
retirement. However, this facility is still not available to all retiring
servicemen.

Next, the book alleges that the military’s economic greed increases in
totalitarian systems, where the general public, private businessmen,
civilian corporate sector and national business units are all oppressed to
encourage and endorse military business units. Her book focuses largely on
the four welfare projects managed by the Pakistan Military i.e. The Fauji
Foundation (FF), the Army Welfare Trust (AWT), Shaheen Foundation (SF) and
Bahria Foundation (BF), and in some places the Frontier Works Organization
(FWO).

The author believes that “the profit earned by military is directly
proportional to power and gives the armed forces a sense of being
independent of the incompetent civilians” - which can only be considered as
an extremely reckless comment.

There was great wisdom behind establishing these welfare projects. The
visionary minds knew that “the profit earned by the military will be
directly proportional to Sovereignty of the Country and the Institution” .

The Military established its first welfare foundation in 1954, with funds
received from the British as part of Pakistan’s share of the Post War
Services Reconstruction Fund. In India, those funds were distributed
immediately amongst those who fought the Second World War. Unlike India,
Pakistan’s wise military opted to use those funds to establish projects that
would ensure the overall well-being, availability of jobs, and a decent
pension for their armed forces.

The initial purpose of these welfare projects was to create employment
opportunities for the honorable retired or disabled military personnel.
Servicemen - whose only obligation is defending the borders of Pakistan.

This one wise decision, not only raised the morals of the serving military
men, but also gave the ordinary citizens a reason to join the Armed Forces
of Pakistan and serve their country. Assured that their future is protected,
the servicemen live their lives in testing times on borders, remote
locations and a life away from family.

The Fauji Foundation, Shaheen Foundation and Bahria Foundation were all
established under the Charitable Endowments Act 1890. The Army Welfare Trust
was established under the Societies Registration Act 1860.

Then all these entities are registered Tax-paying Companies. The Army
Welfare Trust and the Fauji Foundation pays tax at 20% of their profits.
Shaheen Foundation and Bahria Foundation pay Taxes at 30% of their profits.
Fair enough!

This limited industrial base that evolved over years added to the military’s
credibility and resolves to contribute towards the Nation’s socio-economic
development and Pakistan’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Like any ordinary
successful businessmen or multi-national corporations (MNCs), the Pakistan
Military utilized their available structure, nominal budget and dedicated
their human resources for the welfare of the uniformed men and civilians
working in those companies. While also pioneering technology, developing
expertise and establishing quality control.

The book ‘Military Inc’ accuses the Pakistan Armed forces of running
business (MILBUS) that are diverse in nature, ranging from small scale to
large scale corporate enterprises. As examples, it quotes Schools, Banks,
Insurance Company, Radio and TV, a Fertilizer company, Hospitals and
Clinics, Cement plant, Universities and institutes, etc.

Dr. Ayesha Siddiqa left no opportunity to magnify and exaggerate the limited
and partial presence of MILBUS competing in Pakistan’s broad based expanding
economy.

Let’s analyze the limited magnitude and negligible worth of these Military
run ventures, compared to similar mega business entities currently present
in Pakistan.

According to State Bank of Pakistan, there are total 73 Banks in Pakistan.
From which, there are 24 Limited banks, 11 Foreign Banks, 8 Financial Banks,
4 Specialized Banks, 13 Investment Banks, 7 Micro-finance Banks and 6
Islamic banks. Out of these total 73 banks - Dr Ayesha Siddiqa tends to be
intolerable towards ONE ‘Askari Bank’ run by Military? In 2007, Askari Bank
paid a Tax of Rs. 743 million.

According to Federal Bureau of Statistics, there are 24 Cement plants in
Pakistan, and only ONE owned by ‘Fauji Cement Company Ltd’. A Tax-paying
company listed on the Stock Exchange.

According to State Bank of Pakistan, there are total 59 Insurance companies
in Pakistan. There are 4 in the Public sector, 50 companies in the private
sector and 5 are incorporated abroad. Why should anyone be narrow-minded
towards ONE owned by military - ‘Askari General Insurance Ltd’, which is
listed on the Stock Exchange and pays Tax?

According to the Health Division and the P.M.D.C, there are around 924
Hospitals, 12,726 Medical Institutions, 560 Rural Health Centers and 4712
Dispensaries all over Pakistan. Out of these, if 10 Hospitals and 20 Medical
Centers are being run by Fauji Foundation, what’s the hue & cry about? These
Medical services are offered to the military and civilians alike. Even the
prestigious Aga Khan Health Services (AGHS) own 7 Hospitals and 164 Medical
Centers.

According to State Bank Pakistan, there are above 10 Fertilizer Plants in
Pakistan from which 6 are State owned and the rest are private. Out of
these, only ONE is military owned, the ‘Fauji Fertilizer Company Ltd’, which
is listed on the Stock Exchange and audited by KPMG Taseer Hadi & Co, and
pays Tax annually.

According to Higher Education Commission, there are 122 Universities in
Pakistan. Out of which, 65 are in the Public sector and 57 in the private
sector. Foundation University and Bahria University are the only two
affiliated with Armed Forces providing quality education to all citizens
alike.

Foundation Schools have 90 branches all over Pakistan; compared to the City
School which has more than 150 branches and the Beacon-house School which
has around 130 branches. We as a Nation should triumph the quality education
being promoted by the Foundation schools and the model paradigm implemented.

The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has 50,125
companies registered with it. From these only 9 are MILBUS projects. Why
can’t Dr. Ayesha Siddiqa accept these 9 MILBUS projects out of the 50,125
projects broadmindedly?

The author also alleges that Military’s Internal Economy is hampering the
growth of Pakistan’s free market economy - which of course is not true. For
her information, under this same system and era, and under the leadership of
General Musharraf, Pakistan’s free market economy boomed from $75 billion in
1999 to become $160 billion in 2007.

In the last 6 years, the free market economy of Pakistan expanded by $85
billion. The expansion and growth the Civilian Corporate sector, National
Business Units and Multi-National Corporations witnessed in these last 6
years remain unprecedented in Pakistan’s Economic History. Hence proven,
that Military’s Internal Economy did not hamper Pakistan’s free market
economy!

According to Dr Ayesha Siddiqa’s book, the worth of Fauji Foundation is
$169m, the worth of Army Welfare trust is $862m, the worth of Shaheen
Foundation is $34.4m and the worth of Bahria Foundation is $69m. Total worth
of MILBUS entities in Pakistan arise to ONLY $1.135 billion.

Hence, the presence of MILBUS companies, in Pakistan’s free economy of $160
billion, amongst these other sectors and enterprises arises to a negligible
maximum 0.8%.

The Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) Market Capitalization in January 2008 stood
at $75 billion. MILBUS worth as compared to KSE again arises to only 1.5%.

It’s amusing to note that Dr Ayesha Siddiqa wrote a whole book, to malign a
system (MILBUS) whose worth does not exceed 0.8% of Pakistan’s free market
economy.

Dr Ayesha Siddiqa’s desire to portray the Pakistan Military as a coercive
and self serving breed aiming to consolidate their economic power at the
expense of Pakistan, not only erodes her neutrality into bias, but the above
economic comparisons also contradict all her presumptuous and sham claims.
As MILBUS in Pakistan has been competing fairly in free market and
contributing to today’s knowledge-based economy. It has played an active
role to generate revenue for Pakistan and in contributing to overall GDP.

One of the greatest wisdom foreseen, behind establishing MILBUS was to
liberate the Pakistan Armed Forces of international aid assistance and
interference. Classified financial autonomy gives the Armed Forces a sense
of self-respect and confidence of being independent of the dominating
‘International Coalition of the willing’ and their foreign aid.

The Pakistan Army has received a total of around $17 billion from the United
States for arms, equipment and compensation since 1954, the year the United
States entered into defense pacts with Pakistan. Much of it was uselessly
spend during the 1980’s Afghan war and the wars Pakistan fought with India.
After 9/11, the famous foreign assistance of $10 billion comprises 60%
reimbursement costs for expenditure incurred by the Pakistani Military while
patrolling on PAK-Afghan border, recorded in the ‘Coalition Support Funds’.
These worthless assistances have not helped the Pakistan Army contrary to
perception propagated in media reports.

Because, with these insignificant and worthless assistance, follows a series
of humiliating articles and editorials composed in American print media. The
clueless and prejudice Pakistani media ignorantly picks up the chanting and
further plays an important role in distorting and altering the actual facts
and figures. No relevant person is approached to clarify and set facts
straight. Authors like Dr Ayesha Siddiqa bank on such distortion to further
slander the admirable Pakistan Military.

After year 2000, the $85 billion expansion of Pakistan’s economy, decreased
the ratio of US aid & assistance to Pakistan’s economy by around 100%. Now
the U.S aid & assistance account to only 6.25% of Pakistan’s expanding
economy. Pakistan is successfully wriggling out of foreign influence.
Visionary MILBUS was the right step in the right direction at the right
time!

Pakistan Military requires a proper platform utilized to clear the
misperceptions being propagated against them and counter the sham
allegations. In short, Pakistan military lacks the exposure to enhance their
PR with the Public. Pakistani GHQ and ISPR should take up an active role
similar to Pentagon and make their interactions more effective.

Next, the book ‘Military Inc’ considers Pakistan Military the root cause of
social disparity and democratic fiasco. It alleges that socio-political
fragmentation would result in strengthening the army’s control over
politics. Throughout her book, Dr Ayesha Siddiqa lambasts and scoffs at the
concept of MILBUS accusing the military of building assets and calling them
as the ‘new land barons’.

In her desperation to smear the Army, she even fails to condemn the
corruption practiced and coercive measures exercised by the inept political
leaders. How these redundant leaders influence the bureaucracy, alter the
constitution, plunder national institutions, stagnated the trade & exports,
multiplied the foreign debts for the country, rob the country of the foreign
reserves and accumulate their wealth in developed countries - is all
together ignored by her conveniently.

The truth is that the Armed forces are forced to intervene reluctantly and
take control of the state to save it from the irresponsible and hopeless
politicians, who drag the country towards brink of collapse, every time they
come to power.

In short, Pakistan’s external debt rose from $18 billion in 1988 to become
$38 billion by end of 1999. In 1999, Pakistan’s total debt (internal &
external) was almost 90% of its GDP. External debt in ratio to foreign
exchange earnings were 347%. Debt servicing allocated in 1999 budget was 61%
of total revenue resources. According to the World Bank, in 1999-2000
Pakistan was amongst the highly indebted countries.

Despite the above mentioned debacle for Pakistan - the substantial expansion
in the personal wealth, land and business interests of Mr. Zardari and Mr.
Nawaz Sharif has earned them a place in the ‘Top 5 richest people’ of
Pakistan in 2007. Not a single General or military servicemen made it to the
list of ‘Top 40 Richest Pakistani’. Who should we consider a peril to
Pakistan’s existence - these fraudulent politicians or the reserved
military?

The Raiwind complex of Nawaz Sharif, build on an area of around 2000 acre,
consist of palatial residences, 300 acre farm, 500 bed hospital, a school,
200 acre dairy farm, etc - constructed at a cost of above Rs. 800 million.
He personally owns Ittefaq foundries, three Sugar mills, numerous Textile
mills, Steel Mills, Paper Mills, Spinning mills, Engineering companies, and
numerous other business units. He owns several residential properties in
Lahore and Muree. He owns vast acres of lands in Sheikhapura, Chunian,
Raiwind, Multan and Bhopattian. These feudal turned politicians can easily
be labeled as the ‘old Pakistani barons’.

Dr Ayesha Siddiqa also alleges that the military convinces the citizens to
bear additional costs for security on basis of conceived threats to the
State. She wants the public to believe that their taxes are being exploited
at the expense of the notion ‘National Security’. This statement of hers is
an attempt to ignore and snub the volatile situation Pakistan faces at its
borders.

She also remains oblivious to the fact, that India allocates 5 times that of
Pakistan’s defense spending.

However, under President Musharraf, the military spending DECREASED as
percentage of GDP and National budget. It now stands at 3% of GDP and 15% of
National budget. It strikes out though, how Dr Ayesha Siddiqa veils and
ignores the bulk of the National budget of 85% that lies at the disposal of
the manipulative hands of our shady politicians. The public has the right to
know, what proper utilization has been brought about with that unaccountable
85% in the 1990’s?

This derogatory book ‘Military Inc’ intends to sow seeds of disenchantment
amongst the general public against the modest and patriotic institution of
the Armed forces of Pakistan, and lower its grace. Those Armed Forces of
Pakistan that run to protect and deliver relief, to ordinary Pakistanis in
times of calamities, natural disasters, floods, train accidents, and
earthquakes. Does Pakistan have any other force or institution which is as
disciplined and effective in providing speedy help immediately? Shouldn’t we
strengthen this only institution that we have?

The publication of Dr Ayesha Siddiqa’s own book ‘Military Inc’ in 2007, in
President Musharraf’s era, repudiates her claims to term the military rule
as manipulative and suppressive. It’s evident that no subtle or coercive
measures were taken against her or any arm-twisting to curb the publication
of this highly controversial book! Where would she find such boundless and
gracious freedom? The book ‘Military Inc’ has become a checker of the
chessboard being maneuvered by the unknown and ambiguous foreign powers
interested in Balkanization of Pakistan.

The ultimate objective of the book ‘Military Inc’ is to perpetrate friction
and cause dissent amongst the ranks of the disciplined Armed Forces. By
deliberately triggering upheaval within the lower ranks, the intention
appears to encourage internal revolt. As a consequence, the unity,
discipline and allegiance of the Armed Forces of Pakistan can be destroyed.

Thus, to protect the allegiance of the Armed Forces, the whole concept of
visionary MILBUS is justified, as a set of activities for the development of
Pakistan’s military might, meant to counter the rising regional threat
convergence and decreasing dependence upon foreign aid - ultimately
protecting the sovereignty of Pakistan and its savior Armed Forces!

Glory and Triumph to Pakistan Armed Forces!

Afreen Baig is an independent analyst majoring in International Relations
and Economics. She can be reached at> **afreenbaig@ …
<afreenbaig](http://us.mc1114.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=**afreenbaig@…*%3Cafreenbaig)@…>

Pakistan will never prosper for many reasons, but the biggest reason is the corrupt and selfish Army

This is a useless question.

One can also ask in the same vein that

Fauji hospital legal?
Fauji cantonments legal?

Fauj is just that, a group of men who are well fed and well taken care off. Only certain type of men (and women) enjoy fauji life style. So either you join them, or find another profession. Hating fauj of your own country is useless and counter productive.

Nonsense. They have ruled Pak directly and indirectly for the majority of its existence.

By far they are to blame for the sad state of the country today.

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

For the ist time i agree with burqaposhx,

If these military personnel want to have (pension like schemes) of there own, and the scheme is in good hands ( management wise) then y not...

People should learn from the business model of fauji foundation and create their own... as per their size of the organization...

I once have made a consortium to establish a fertilizer unit with fauji foundation in Pakistan, i found them hard-wroking and professional in their approach. I think the lame-ducks want to blame the eagle for their lazyness...

^^ Thanks for agreeing with me for the 1st time. Hopefully there will be a second time too and soon (like before December 2009) :-)

Yes you are right. Fauj is a good scapegoat in the hands of Leftists (and these days religious fundos too).

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

Why you don't talk about D H A . ( now Dirty Hands Alliance )

What do you want to talk about? Say it if you have something positive to contribute. Isharon kinayon main, akhion akhion main kya batain karni?

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

My mamo's domestic helper's daughter was diagnosed with cancer of the bone marrow and after being sent in circles by different hospitals, Fauji Foundation was recommended to him and he took his daughter to Pindi. He said they were very helpful and supportive and they charged him less + gave a fantastic service. Legal or Illegal but the likes of Al Shifa and Fauji Foundation seem to be a hit with the people.

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

I am okay with Fauji Foundation as long as it does not use land awarded to "army" for commercial/industrial units competing local industry, as long as army's construction projects are awarded after fair bidding process etc.

I am sorry. Have nothing more to loose now but I assure You Very soon You shall see a real picture of happening on this name. Look Ansar Abbasi , Kamran Khan, Hamid Meer , Dr Shahid Massod, Nusrat and other very famous including onw whose van was even fired do not say a word. They critisize Politicians and innocent girl but silent on Pakistan's biggest mafia. How sad I am I can not tell you. After Years of struggle at last i am fourced to beant down.

Military intelligence (MI), Inter Service Intelligence (ISI), Federal Intelligence Agency (FIA), Pakistan Rangers, and the Frontier Constabulary (FC) are the main agencies who are keeping persons incommunicado and who torture them to confess their involvement in anti-state activities.
It is interesting to note that the army officials are interrogating persons from Balochistan to force a confession admitting their involvement with the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and those arrested from Sindh about their involvement with the Sindh Liberation Army (SLA). The military rulers are certain that both these organisations are working to disassociate themselves from Pakistan.
Arrestees from the North West Frontier Province were initially held in the custody of the army before being transferred to Afghanistan. There, after going through severe torture and being held incommunicado, many of them were handed over to the occupied forces, to be again transferred to Guantanamo Bay, the notorious American holding/interrogati ng centre. The Pakistan army was the beneficiary of this whole episode and this is the reason why the western countries never criticised the government of Pakistan on the issue of missing persons.
The newly elected government has totally ignored the issue of missing persons. It has not started to probe the issue of missing persons despite several persons, who were kept incommunicado in military detention, have testified before the courts that they were kept in army camps and tortured severely..
There still remain several thousands of persons who have been missing since 2001 and the seemingly callous attitude of the government is creating a sense of depression and disappointment in the people. And these are the people who elected the ruling coalition expecting a change in the country.
The AHRC urges the international community, particularly the UN Human Rights Council and other international human rights groups to intervene in the cases of missing persons of Pakistan who are still being held incommunicado by the law enforcement agencies. There is a high risk of many of them disappearing soon if action is not taken quickly.
The following is a list of some of the illegal detention centres. There are still hundreds of human rights activists held in torture centres according to local human rights organisations, media and nationalist and political groups. It is believed that there are 52 such torture centres in Pakistan:
Islamabad, capital of Pakistan

(1) Sector I-9 Islamabad; (2) Cell 20 in Sector I-9 Islamabad; (3) ‘safe house’ of the ISI, Islamabad
Sindh Province:

  • In Karachi, the capital of Sindh province, there are three detention centres of the army. They are: (1) the centre of MI at Shar-e-Faisal, Saddar, near Hotel Holiday Inn; (2) the torture and detention centre of the ISI is also in this vicinity which could be accessed through the St. Paul’s School; (3) in Malir cantonment area in one of the ‘safe houses’ with several small cells
    In Karachi, the Pakistan Rangers is also running a detention centre at Landhi. However the actual location is not confirmed as the persons released from there were kept blindfolded all the time.
  • In Hyderabad, Sindh province, at the cantonment area, at the Army House, off Qasim Chowk
  • Jacobabad is the border district with Balochistan province. This city is providing the United States Air Force and the NATO air support facilities. There is a detention centre run by the Pakistan army which is used as a ‘transit centre’. This centre was unearthed when two journalists of a prominent television channel spoke when they were recovered after several months of detention and torture allegedly for taking pictures of an airbase.
    Balochistan Province:
  • In Balochistan province there are dozens of military detention centres, where people after their arrest, are detained and tortured to force confession statements about their alleged activities against the army in the province. Following are places in Balochistan province where Pakistan army and FC are running their torture and detention centres:
  • Quli Camp Cantonment Queta, in the capital of Balochistan province. In front of this detention camp there is a mountain called as Koh-e-Murad (Dead Mountain) which has been taken over by the Pakistan Army and is used as a dumping area for some sensitive arms and ammunitions. According to local people, people are brought here and detained for several months.
  • Safe house of the ISI at Khuzdar Cantonment area. The Khuzdar district is in southeast of the province and all detained or arrested persons by the state intelligence agencies from south and southeast districts are brought and kept over here. The place is notorious for torture.
  • The fort at Turbat town, a sub-district of the province. This fort is used for keeping missing persons and still there are dozens of missing persons in the fort, but it is under the control of FC. In the port city of Gwadar there is one more camp used by the FC for keeping people in illegal detention for several months.
  • In the northern part of the Balochistan province, there are several places of detention and torture in three districts namely - Sibi, Dera Bugti and Kohlu. Here, the military have their own bases and camps. But in military terms these army centres are called “settlements” instead of cantonments. In these districts the persons arrested are mainly from the central and the northern parts. The main military detention centres are in Loti gas field, Pir Koh gas field and Dera Bugti gas field.
    Most of the detainees are local residents of the above named districts. They are charged with mutiny against the ‘army control’ of the districts, blowing up of the main gas supply line to the other parts of the country, sabotage, bomb attacks on military installations, affiliation with different nationalist parties and association with the Balochistan Liberation Army.
    In Kohlu district’s military settlement there is one check post. This is purely run by the army which has torture cells. In Sui sub-district there is also a military check post which runs torture cell besides a main detention centre in the “settlement” at Sui gas field.
    Punjab Province:
  • In Punjab, there are two main cantonment areas where detention and torture centres are maintained only for the purpose of keeping “missing persons”. These centres are Multan and Rawalpindi cantonment areas. These areas are close to the General Head Quarter (GHQ) of the Pakistan Army. The Rawalpindi cantonment based detention centre is in ‘safe house’ which is said to be the most cruel among all army detention centres. Still there are more than four dozens of missing persons who are kept since several months in these centres. It is said to be that it is here persons who are ‘hard to crack’ are kept, who had not confessed during the torture in other detention centres..
    There are more centres of detention in Rawalpindi city which are maintained in hospitals. Here, people from the North-West Frontier Province and those alleged as Jihadis are kept besides the nationalists from the Sindh and Balochistan provinces. In the Multan cantonment, the ‘safe houses’ meant for rest houses, are used as detention centres and much of the so called high profile terrorists are detained.
    The following detention centres in Rawalpindi and Islamabad were revealed by Mrs. Amina Masood Paracha, the Chair Person of an NGO named Defense Human Rights, Islamabad:
  • ISI Detention Centre in Kent Garrison Chaklala (near Rawalpindi airport)
  • ISI Detention Centre behind the Military Hospital in Rawalpindi - Hamza Centre (Ojri Camp Rawalpindi)
  • FIA Centre near Qasim Market
  • Chaklala Airbase Rawalpindi
  • Military hospitals on Mall Road Rawalpindi
  • Hamza Centre - Ojri Camp Faizabad - Rawalpindi
    In Dera Ghazi Khan and Rahim Yar Khan districts there are detention centres at the cantonments. When in 2004, 13 students from Balochistan, belonging to the Baloch Students’ Organization were detained at the Dera Ghazi Khan Cantonment detention centre for almost five months and tortured, this centre was exposed. It is still functioning and it is infamous for dumping tortured people on the roadside when it is confirmed that the victim cannot survive further torture.
  • The cantonment areas of Peshawar and Chirat are used as detention centres for keeping arrested persons from areas dominated by fundamentalists Islamic forces.
    There are 48 cantonments in Pakistan which all have illegal detention centres that operate as torture cells. All these cantonments have rest-houses which are called ‘safe houses’ that has been converted into illegal detention centres.
    Now that these places of detention and torture are identified, there is no excuse for the Government of Pakistan to ignore it. Yet this is precisely what it happening. The AHRC urges the international community and the UN to intervene in this situation calling upon the government to investigate about the existence of these centres in the country and to immediately release the prisoners held therein.

#

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

Asian Human Rights Commission
For any suggestions, please email to support@ahrchk. net.

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

Har Shakh Pe Uloo Betha Hay
** Anjam-e-Gulistan Kia Ho Ga**

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

Wah! Anwer.

In case of Pakistan,

Har shakh pe Musalman (and not an Ullu) betha hai. Because Muslims are 97% of the country's population.

Re: Is Fauji Foundation legal?

Sir Soomalia is also a Muslim country and this is not personal and it is said by a poet and first time used in national assembly of first dictator Ayoub Khan by opposition leader

National assembly of a dictator. An oxymoron perhaps!