Is Army and civilian government headed for confrontation again?

[kakaballi]

Re: Is Army and civilian government headed for confrontation again?

^ It is so very interesting that how you conveniently divide Pakistanis: one on side is corrupt, morally filthy and incompetent civilians, some of them being fasadi, khariji fundamentalists heavily influenced by an ex-playboy and on the other side are competent, honest and efficient military men who have nothing to do with evolution of fundamentalist mindset.

@Sa1eem

…I do not think there is much difference between India and Pakistan, as both governments consist of corrupts (Pakistan rulers being more corrupt than India). Exception is that army has not taken over India government. Reason is that Indian army do not represent India as much as what Pakistani force do. If Pakistan armed forces would be 80 percentage Bolochs, Sindhis, and Kashmiris, and very few from Punjab and KP, then there would be no military takeover even if rulers of Pakistan sell the country to India or China..

Doesn’t make sense at all.

@Sa1eem

Anywhere we see developments under democracy, it happened where one can find strong, competent, efficient, and incorruptible accountability, judiciary, bureaucracy, and policing. Along with strong self-accountability in political parties and selection of candidates for election who have high moral grounds (according to the values of their country), plus no one in political office in these countries are secure or above law.

Perhaps you read the history backwards. Strong, competent, efficient, and incorruptible accountability, judiciary, bureaucracy, and policing are result of sustained democracy, not prerequisites.

@Sa1eem

And yea, all this establishment of democracy in west happened after first military bringing strong accountability in the country…

as in NRO?

BTW, can you provide specific example of western countries where military brought strong accountability, justice, policing and then democracy took over?