Iraqi women taste liberation at last

This makes me absolutely furious.

It’s men who start these wars, and women/children/the elderly/the sick who must pay the ultimate price. Some of you reading this are married, some of you have daughters of your own. Imagine how you would feel, God Forbid, if this happened to someone you knew personally…your mother, your daughter, your sister. Just imagine for a second.

What type of liberation is this? Even under Hussein’s regime, Iraq received a UNESCO award for furthering women’s literacy rates; today, Iraqi women don’t even feel safe walking outside alone. Who in their rational minds can call this liberation.

Rape (and Silence About It) Haunts Baghdad
Neela Banerjee, New York Times, 16 July 2003

In her loose black dress, gold hairband and purple flip-flops, Sanariya hops from seat to seat in her living room like any lively 9-year-old. She likes to read. She wants to be a teacher when she grows up, and she says Michael, her white teddy bear, will be her assistant.

But at night, the memory of being raped by a stranger seven weeks ago pulls her into its undertow. She grows feverish and has nightmares, her 28-year-old sister, Fatin, said. She cries, “Let me go!”

“I am afraid of the gangsters,” Sanariya whispered in the twilight of her hallway. “I feel like they are killing me in my nightmares. Every day, I have these nightmares.”

Since the end of the war and the outbreak of anarchy on the capital’s streets, women here have grown increasingly afraid of being abducted and raped. Rumors swirl, especially in a country where rape is so rarely reported.

**The breakdown of the Iraqi government after the war makes any crime hard to quantify.

But the incidence of rape and abduction in particular seems to have increased, according to discussions with physicians, law-enforcement officials and families involved.

A new report by Human Rights Watch based on more than 70 interviews with law-enforcement officials, victims and their families, medical personnel and members of the coalition authority found 25 credible reports of abduction and sexual violence since the war. Baghdadis believe there are far more, and fear is limiting women’s role in the capital’s economic, social and political life just as Iraq tries to rise from the ashes, the report notes.**

For most Iraqi victims of abduction and rape, getting medical and police assistance is a humiliating process. Deeply traditional notions of honor foster a sense of shame so strong that many families offer no consolation or support for victims, only blame.

Sanariya’s four brothers and parents beat her daily, Fatin said, picking up a bamboo slat her father uses. The city morgue gets corpses of women who were murdered by their relatives in so-called honor killings after they returned from an abduction — even, in some cases, when they had not been raped, said Nidal Hussein, a morgue nurse.

“For a woman’s family, all this is worse than death,” said Dr. Khulud Younis, a gynecologist at the Alwiyah Women’s Hospital. “They will face shame. If a woman has a sister, her future will be gone. These women don’t deserve to be treated like this.”

It is not uncommon in Baghdad to see lines of cars outside girls’ schools. So fearful are parents that their daughters will be taken away that they refuse to simply drop them off; they or a relative will stay outside all day to make sure nothing happens.

“Women and girls today in Baghdad are scared, and many are not going to schools or jobs or looking for work,” said Hanny Megally, executive director of the Middle East and North Africa division of Human Rights Watch. “If Iraqi women are to participate in postwar society, their physical security needs to be an urgent priority.”

Beyda Jafar Sadiq, 17, made the simple decision to go to school on the morning of May 22 and never returned. Her family has been looking for her ever since. They have appealed to every international nongovernmental organization, the Iraqi police and the American authorities. Her eldest brother, Feras, 29, has crisscrossed the country, visiting the morgue in Basra in the south, traveling to Amara and Nasiriya on reports from acquaintances that they saw a girl who looked like Beyda.

“I just want to find her,” said Beyda’s mother, Zakiya Abd, her eyes swollen with grief. “Whether she’s alive or dead, I just want to find her.”

Some police in Baghdad concede that at this point, there is little they can do to help. Their precinct houses were thoroughly looted after the war. Despite promises from the American authorities, Baghdad police still lack uniforms, weapons, communications and computer equipment and patrol cars.

“We used to patrol all the time before the war,” said a senior officer at the Aadimiya precinct house. “Now, nothing, and the criminals realize there is no security on the streets.”

[Rest of article accessible via link above]

(Latest news from around the world | The Guardian), Donna Bryson
The Guardian, 16 July 2003

U.S. troops must do more for rape victims who are being turned away by Iraqi police and hospitals and the country’s reconstruction should include reform of sex crime laws, a human rights group said Tuesday.

Until Iraqi police can do the job themselves, U.S.-led coalition forces should establish a unit of men and women trained to investigate sex crimes and sex trafficking, Human Rights Watch said in a report.

The New York-based group also called on coalition forces to train Iraqi police to better respond to reports of sex crimes.

Human Rights Watch said crimes against women have increased along with other crime since Saddam Hussein was ousted in early April.

The problem, however, could in part be traced to a regime whose laws fostered attitudes that women could invite sexual assault, the report said.

"Plans for Iraq’s reconstruction are taking shape and the rights of women and girls are at stake,‘’ it said.

Those involved in reconstruction should counter any "trends toward treating women and girls unequally before the law and discouraging women and girls from reporting sexual violence, or punishing women and girls for being the victims of crimes of sexual violence,‘’ the report said.

The report was based on interviews in May and June in Baghdad with four victims of sexual violence and abduction, as well as with dozens of Iraqi police officers, U.S. military police officers and hospital and other officials.

Human Rights Watch noted that rape and abduction were serious crimes in Iraq. But it said the penal code under Saddam allowed a man to escape punishment for abduction by marrying the victim and set light or reduced sentences for so-called honor killings - the murder of women accused by relatives of besmirching family honor by being raped.

"There is a long-standing cultural stigma and shame attached to rape that positions victims as the wrongdoer and too frequently excuses or treats leniently the perpetrator,‘’ the report said.

Now, in the chaos of post-Saddam Iraq, hospitals are crowded with victims of other crimes. "In some cases, women and girls who have sought assistance for sexual violence were refused medical attention because some hospital staff do not regard treating victims of sexual violence as their responsibility, or give such care low priority given their limited resources,‘’ the report said.

Human Rights Watch found instances of police unable or unwilling to give women referrals for hospital examinations needed to build a case against their attackers.

Some police officers told the rights group women have invited sexual assault by venturing outside their homes before Baghdad was safe. Many women are staying at home - and away from school and work, the report said.

Women’s status in Iraqi society was the envy of their counterparts elsewhere in the Arab world in the 1970s and 1980s. Their role in public life, however, steadily diminished as Saddam sought to accommodate a rising tide of religious fundamentalism in the wake of Iraq’s defeat in the 1991 Gulf War.

<>

What is disgusting is the status of women under islamic fundamentalist preachings and governance.

:teary1: astagfirallah..

dont you guys feel helpless after reading such articles…
what is there to do? I cant be content in just being aware of a problem…
somethig should be done.

The religious leaders in Iraq are more concerned with the presence of the United States than they are for the welfare of the Iraqis.

^^ And the US along with the allies are more interested in having Anti-American people like Saddam out of Iraq, rather than being worried about the basic needs of Iraqi people.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ahmadjee: *
^^ And the US along with the allies are more interested in having Anti-American people like Saddam out of Iraq, rather than being worried about the basic needs of Iraqi people.
[/QUOTE]

The fact is that there has been progress in rebuilding the infrastructure and at the same time it is being sabotage by Saddam supporters. Getting rid of people like Saddam and his supporters will in fact help get basic needs to the Iraqi people.

One of the sad things about all this (among many sad things) is that one could advance the proposition that Freedom and a rape free society are mutually exclusive in Iraq. I can almost feel an undercurrent in some posts that having a repressive tyrant like Saddam Hussein is an acceptable alternative to freedom because the process of re-establishing a free and democratic society brings with it rising tides of crime like rape.

I refuse to accept the proposition that if you give an Iraqi man freedom from tyranny and repression, he will necessarily rape young Iraqi girls. What is a reasonable proposition is that if you fail to have an effective security and law enforcement apparatus in effect, the worst of any group of people will take advantage of the situation and commit crimes and other atrocities.

I don't think anyone would dispute that with the purge of the Baathist's, the deposing of the Iraqi regime and the dismantling of the torture and security infrastructure supporting them, there exists a vacuum that must be filled. The sooner the better. Filling that vacuum quickly depends upon developing a working and cooperative relationship between non-Baathist Iraqis and occupying troops. I suspect that a cooperative relationship would be more likely to occur if Saddam & Sons were captured or killed and taken totally out of the equation. Saddam sympathizers would have little reason to carry on a dangerous resistance and Saddam haters could shed the last vestiges of fear he has engendered in them. I sure wish they would get those SOBs real soon. I can accept not finding OBL a lot easier than than I can Saddam. Saddam doesn't strike me as a guy who would be comfortable living as a cave dwelling Nomad. He's much more likely to be sleeping in a nice comfortable bed somewhere than a rock.

myvoice bhai jaan,

Can it also be a case of lack of preparation on part of the US Armed Forces in the post war era? Can it be that in the billions of dollars spent on the perfect war plan lacked the idea of how we are going to run the place when we will be in-charge? Can it be the hastiness of the administration that led to such a shortfall? Can it be that we really don't care as long as the pumps are running?!

I think the best judge of which option was better, Saddam's removal or the anarchy after he left, will be the people who are living in it, day in day out!

As far as the Americans are concerned, even if the average life of it's citizens is safer with one less tyrant in the world, I don't see them sighing any relief. Instead, all I see is people complaining about troops being killed and wanting them back home. And an air of uncertainity about Iraq & the rest of the world, which seems to hate us more every day.

underthedome,

It's a matter of opinion ...

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by ahmadjee: *
**myvoice
* bhai jaan,

Can it also be a case of lack of preparation on part of the US Armed Forces in the post war era? Can it be that in the billions of dollars spent on the perfect war plan lacked the idea of how we are going to run the place when we will be in-charge? Can it be the hastiness of the administration that led to such a shortfall? Can it be that we really don't care as long as the pumps are running?!

[/QUOTE]

I don't think it was a lack of preparation, hastiness or a lack of idea. I think the key here is your comment/expectation regarding the "perfect war plan." No such thing exists. As in any type of planning in any type of arena, you develop the best plan you can, make certain assumptions based upon your body of knowledge, cover as many contingencies as you can think of and then modify the plan as you go along to adapt it to circumstances. Plans of all kinds are dynamic in nature.

If you rephrase to say something like "could it be that the best case assumptions and scenarios you envisioned did not pan out" or "could it be that certain events on the ground came as surprises" I would agree.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ahmadjee: *
I think the best judge of which option was better, Saddam's removal or the anarchy after he left, will be the people who are living in it, day in day out!
[/QUOTE]

I agree with the principle but wonder at what point in time does the answer to the question become most relevant. Right now, few Iraqis would probably say they wished Saddam were back. At the same time, the majority understandably don't want what they have now. Then again, we don't want for them what they have now either. We want something more and we are spending about $4 billion a month trying to help them make things better.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ahmadjee: *
As far as the Americans are concerned, even if the average life of it's citizens is safer with one less tyrant in the world, I don't see them sighing any relief. Instead, all I see is people complaining about troops being killed and wanting them back home. And an air of uncertainity about Iraq & the rest of the world, which seems to hate us more every day.
[/QUOTE]

There are probably very few Americans who don't hurt every time an American serviceman is Killed in Iraq and virtually all of us want them back home. I don't know why that should surprise you or anyone else. Americans don't want to occupy Iraq any more than they want to occupy China, Pakistan or Sweden. We want the situation in Iraq to get settled, let the Iraqi people freely run their own country and get out as soon as possible. I think you overestimate the importance to us of figuring out who hates us and why. As long as they don't try to kill and maim Americans, they can hate us all they want and we could care less.

Really interesting comments in this thread.

Thanks for the responses, all.

**

Muniya :flower1: :flower1: Was so glad to read another female’s reply in this Forum.

i am not certain what precisely you meant by “what is there to do?” - do you mean in terms of donations? If you meant sending money, i am not very certain of reputable organizations that are currently working within Iraq; the best IMHO would be the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (webpage). Another idea i thought of, a simple one, not certain how it would actually work - is to print off this NYT article, run several copies of it, then distribute it at Friday’s juma prayer subsequent to the prayers, at your local uni or Masjid. (Manifestly, get approval from the Imam prior to this, ask him to make a little speech about this to inform the congregation that funds are needed for this particular cause, etc etc.). Have a simple box set up by the door where individuals can donate money. Do this for a month, and collect all the money - and then write out a cheque to the Red Cross (address is located above on their website).
Islamic Relief and Unicef UK are two other organizations that accept donations online and do practical work within the country, (Unicef in particular is good if you want to help projects for children).

When you donate money to them, you can earmark which country in specific you want the funds to go towards (Mozambique, Iraq, etc.).

Besides that, you have already taken the first step that most individuals do not - reading and educating yourself about this issue :k: The more we know, the more informed we become and the more we can raise awareness about this to others.

Some very good suggestions you made..
In this case though it seems as if money isnt the solution.
or atleast not the complete solution.

I've actually asked my mom to say and extra prayers this week when the women gather at the local mosque.

I will definately try your idea about the flyers.

PS I really loved what you wrote in the end.. its true we should be informed.... I never really looked at this way...

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
The religious leaders in Iraq are more concerned with the presence of the United States than they are for the welfare of the Iraqis.
[/QUOTE]

The United States is more concerned with protecting Iraq's oil wells, than it's people, and the Iraqi's are acutely aware of that.

The rest of the world (including Iraq's neighbors) have been more concerned with lip service and inaction than they have been with protecting or helping the people of Iraq.

**

Thanks, Muniya. :flower1:

At least you took the first step of educating yourself about this issue…which is more than a lot of us do.

In all the fuss about WMD, al Qaeda, “liberation”, elections, democracy, etc etc., this issue has been completely neglected. Imagine if these were European women - the response would have been completely different.

america has really liberated iraq....
if not all, atleast the criminals....

Astagfurallah

Reading things like this just makes you filled with hate and anger. You can't help but think whats this world coming to, what a very very sad state indeed. We as humans are very weak and Allah (swt) is the only one who can help us, he see's, hear's, and know's everything.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *
I don't think it was a lack of preparation, hastiness or a lack of idea. I think the key here is your comment/expectation regarding the "perfect war plan." No such thing exists. As in any type of planning in any type of arena, you develop the best plan you can, make certain assumptions based upon your body of knowledge, cover as many contingencies as you can think of and then modify the plan as you go along to adapt it to circumstances. Plans of all kinds are dynamic in nature....
[/QUOTE]

I wonder how other societies behaved in similar situations - a foreign nation invades and removes army and takes control of government but does not "police" the society.

I really think it was lack of planning, if not planning than lack of care. Right after "successful" invasion/taking control of Baghdad people were on street engaged in looting but US forces didn't impose any "CURFEW" perhaps they were expecting a large crowd to bring loads of flowers and demonstrate in favor of US soldiers/army.