Iraq humanitarian crisis verging on catastrophe / Economy declines by half (MERGED)

Ill-supplied nation faces ‘a huge problem like you have never seen’

Iraq humanitarian crisis verging on catastrophe](http://www.sunspot.net/bal-te.aid09apr09.story) The Baltimore Sun 10 Apr 03

By Todd Richissin Sun Foreign Staff

KUWAIT CITY – With Iraqi hospitals full of wounded and water shortages made evident by people in southern Iraq drinking from drainage ditches, humanitarian aid workers are warning that the worst for civilians could be yet to come.

Hundreds of thousands of gallons of water are needed in the south of Iraq, from the port city of Umm Qasr, where water is beginning to trickle in, to the chaotic city of Basra, where it is not. If the electricity needed for purifying water in the north remains cut, the problems for people in Baghdad and its environs could become even more severe. Medical supplies are desperately needed throughout the country, aid workers said yesterday, and Iraqi doctors and nurses have worked to exhaustion because of the number of severely wounded civilians combined with sharply depleted staff. Also, humanitarian deliveries of food might be necessary on a scale never before seen.

[thumb=B]siraqiw.JPG[/thumb]

The programs to address all these needs are in place. The problem is that the continued fighting, in virtually every part of Iraq, has left aid workers lining the country’s borders but frustrated at their inability to transport their goods. “The clock is ticking, and if time runs out, we will have a huge problem like you have never seen before,” said Marc Vergara, a UNICEF worker who has been trying to get water into Iraq. “We can’t get too far in because it’s too dangerous for our workers. And when we can’t get in, it’s dangerous for the civilians.”

Since Sunday, UNICEF has been able to get water tankers into Umm Qasr, Safwan, Zubayr and a southern suburb of Basra. But the supply has not come close to meeting the demand, Vergara said. With people drinking water from any source they can find, health workers are concerned about outbreaks of dysentery and cholera in a population already largely malnourished. “What we’re doing is symbolic,” Vergara said. “It does not come close to meeting the need.”

Water lines running from treatment plants in Basra have been damaged in the war, and they ran at only about 60 percent capacity before the hostilities. British military officials say that the treatment plants were further damaged during fighting, and that even water running into Basra – a city of nearly 2 million people – has been cut to about half the normal flow. A water line from Kuwait into Umm Qasr was opened this month, but it also falls short of the need, and some of that water has been hijacked by bandits who sell it on the black market, meaning that the most desperate people – the weak and the poor – are doing without.

Before the war, aid organizations hoped to get water, medical supplies and food – in that order of priority – quickly into southern Iraq, where they saw the need was already great. When Saddam Hussein was not brutalizing Shiite Muslims in the south, he was neglecting them, and virtually everybody in the region relied on United Nations food programs to survive. When U.S. troops traveled north to Baghdad, before clearing out resistance in Umm Qasr and other southern cities, the civilian populations left behind faced great needs with no safe way for the aid organizations – nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs, as they are known – to deliver the supplies.

“The longer this goes on, the more hunger, the more sickness, the more deaths there will be,” said Nicole Amoroso, spokeswoman for Save the Children, which this week began sending investigators into Umm Qasr to assess the needs there. “We’re a long ways from getting into Basra, let alone Baghdad.” They do not want to enter cities with armed military escorts because they feel that if they are perceived as being aligned with any fighting force in any conflict, it could put them in danger in that operation and any others in the future.

The World Food Program has 32,000 tons of wheat, flour, rice, vegetable oil, baby formula and other supplies sitting in warehouses in Jordan, Turkey, Syria, Iran and Kuwait. Another 400,000 tons are scheduled to arrive next month, according to the organization’s spokeswoman, Antonia Paradela. “Right now, people have food in their stomach but nothing that you would call a rich diet,” she said. “Soon they will have no food at all, and when that happens, the problems will be massive. It will be the biggest food distribution in history, and we have been able to do very little work.”

The food program has begun assessments on need in Umm Qasr but nowhere else. Safwan is considered too dangerous but might be safe enough soon. Basra is out of the question, she said, with fighting continuing in some areas, and wild looting occurring almost everywhere. Medical supplies were stockpiled in warehouses around Iraq in preparation for the war, but they, too, are dwindling, said Tamara Al-Rifai, a spokeswoman for the International Committee of the Red Cross. Water is needed as much as medicine, and blankets are in low supply because so many have been adapted for use as body bags.

The Red Cross said that hospitals are packed with civilians, and that the ability to treat them has been hampered not only by a shortage of supplies but also by power outages. At Baghdad’s Al-Kindi hospital Monday, the organization said it counted 10 new patients arriving during each of the morning hours with generators supplying electricity. At the Medical City hospital, the Red Cross said that water and electricity are out, and that only six of 27 operating areas were usable. “The situation is very, very difficult,” said Al-Rifai. “More people are going to die who could be saved if there was adequate treatment available. The question is how many. That will depend on how long the war lasts.”

:-)
its ok. america did the right thing by destroying all the facilities. this way these kids won't live long and won't add to the problems of america and britain. as we all know these kids would grow up to become terrorists and thats not good for america. so better to kill many birds with one stone. saddam is gone. his regime is gone. people are now killing the supporters of saddam infront of american and british solders and lack of facilities are killing civilians. wow, what a plan :-)

God bless america for being so humane and champion of liberation for the chosen ones. rest can go to hell :-)

Three weeks on, and still no water. Now doctors fear an epidemic
Ewen MacAskill, 14 April 2003

Doctors in Iraq’s second city, Basra, warned yesterday of an epidemic as a majority of the 1.3 million residents were still without safe drinking water three weeks after the war began.

Attempts to restore the supply have failed, despite hopes expressed in the first week that it would take a matter of days. Help from aid agencies is only trickling in.

Tamara al-Rifai, the representative of the International Committee of the Red Cross based in Kuwait, said looting was partly to blame. Lack of security was making it difficult for aid agencies to enter the town, and looters had taken pipes before they could be installed to help distribution.

“The fact that we have gone a few steps back makes it even more serious,” she said.

Uday Abdul Bakri, general surgeon at the 600-bed Basra general hospital, said the hospital was dealing with many diarrhoea cases and the risk of water-acquired diseases, such as cholera and dysentery, was high.

“I think there will be an epidemic,” he said.

The shortage of drinking water is a problem across southern Iraq.

There is huge resentment in Basra against the British forces because of the lack of water and electricity. Residents also blame them for failing to control the looters.

One resident in the centre of Basra said: “Bush bad. Blair bad. They destroyed our water and electricity.”

Another, Axad Toblanid, 50, an engineer, said: "We are unhappy with this freedom. We have no water. We have complained to the British army about this but they are not doing anything.

“It is not safe. The British army say, ‘we are not policemen.’ It is the rule of international law that any town where the army is in control must protect us, but they don’t.”

Come on guys, Rumsfeld already said there is no crisis in Iraq. And its only one person being repeatedly shown on TV to steal vases, there ain't as many.

i was wrong, Changez_Like. Rummy was right. No humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq, no crisis - everything is just hunky dory. :k: To prove this, i wonder whether Rummy would like to take a sip from this beautiful little stream:

[thumb=B]capt.1050349755.iraq_war_basra_lab102.JPG[/thumb]
Caption: Iraqi people take water from a polluted area for household needs in Basra, southern Iraq Monday April 14, 2003. Water is in great demand since the bombing cut off the city’s water supply. (AP Photo/Adam Butler)

Hospitals, water purification plants - who cares about those as long as all the oil wells are safely secured.

IMOH

I would seriously doubt that the powers that be would allow an epidemic to begin.

Hey?

I thought the U.K. guys were trying to fix the water plants?

If not...they should be importing bottled water.

Sorry, AAG, the sight of that polluted stream, with people actually drinking from it, particularly when i considered how advanced (nutritionally and economically) the country used to be prior to sanctions - it frustrates me like nothing else.

i am sure it is not the intention of the powers that be to permit a catastrophe to occur. The intention is irrelevant (that is not for me to judge), it is the present state of Iraq i am more worried about. Now that we are witnessing a man-made humanitarian catastrophe, what responsibilities do the powers that be, have? A responsibility to ensure that logistical obstacles vis-a-vis distribution/access of aid are smoothed over, and that American/British soldiers themselves start repairing the electrical and water purification plants 24/7.

To do nothing now, would be grievously unjust (and, IMHO, unforgivable).

Just as predicted would happen by the UN and NGO’s..

Baghdad hospital system collapsing](http://www.iribnews.com/Full_en.asp?news_id=178001) IRIB News 14 Apr 03

Baghdad, April 14 - Baghdad’s hospital system has broken down completely since the US invasion, crippled by a lack of electricity and water and security fears that have kept away most staff, relief groups said. Only the biggest of the capital’s 33 hospitals are providing signficant services, they said. One of them is under US military guard and the other watched over by neighborhood protection squads. “The medical system in Baghdad has virtually collapsed,” the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said.

“The dead are left unattended and the increasing summer heat and deteriorating water and electricity supplies create a high risk of epidemic disease,” it said in a statement Friday. Hospitals have been closed because of combat damage or a lack of electricity and water. Many were partially or completely looted in the frenzy that followed the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime on Wednesday.

“They had piles and piles of corpses in a room, and finally they just buried them under the front lawn. It’s just awful.” :disgust:

Red Cross workers desperate](What's New in Canadian Online Gambling Industry in 2025?) Edmonton Sun, 14 Apr 03

By SHANE HOLLADAY, EDMONTON SUN

Red Cross workers in Baghdad face a desperate situation after coalition forces failed to quell violence and looting in Iraq streets, says agency spokesman Suzanne Charest. “Its quite horrific, they have a very serious problem with looting in hospitals,” said Charest, adding she last spoke to her counterpart Roland Hugenin in Baghdad Saturday. Doctors at the Al-Yarmouk teaching hospital, which had been regularly supported by the Red Cross, were forced to barricade themselves in the building’s back rooms while looters rampaged through the medical facility.

Doctors were even forced to attempt surgery without anaesthetic, said Charest. Adding to the grim situation were bodies left to decompose in the streets, ripening the possibility of a plague outbreak, she said. "There you have a very serious health hazard. “What the Red Cross would (also) hope to do is at least inform the families of their individual deaths.”

Another hospital Hugenin visited had no power and was also at a loss how to deal with bodies, Charest said. “They had piles and piles of corpses in a room, and finally they just buried them under the front lawn. It’s just awful.” Coalition forces must act to preserve infrastructure and begin policing the streets, said Charest, or the situation will grow increasingly dire.

Security needs to be provided so the engineer corps can get in and fix these facilities, a dead engineer can't do ****. Water has been partly restored but no one has a magic wand to make the situation instantly better.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by underthedome: *
Security needs to be provided so the engineer corps can get in and fix these facilities, a dead engineer can't do *
**. Water has been partly restored but no one has a magic wand to make the situation instantly better.
[/QUOTE]
Security my foot!! Why did they have to be put in this situation in the first place.. fact is that civilian facilities were targetted in the US raids... fact is that public workers ran the risk of having their heads blown off by the huge amount of missiles / shells dropped on to their city. This humanitarian disaster has been created by the US and its up to them now to rebuild the essential infrastructure otherwise they should pack their bags and allow the UN and EU to accomplish this task.

The fact is that's happening. It takes time, which the Iraqi people have little of but it is occuring.

Well I wonder if volunteers would help? Iraqi, American, Brittish nurses.

Or even caregivers?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by AvgAmericanGirl: *Well I wonder if volunteers would help? Iraqi, American, Brittish nurses.

Or even caregivers?
[/QUOTE]
There are already a number of NGO's operating in Iraq but their work has been hampered by the US invasion and the lawlessness that has followed. The humanitarian situation has been allowed to deteriorate by the US military which turned out to be a big mistake, as hundreds of civilian buildings, essential facilities and dozens of hospitals have been ransacked or burnt down. The US is primarily to blame for this situation and now theres talk of setting up police patrols and a curfew at night which has come a little too late for many.

Your primarily blaming the U.S. for the actions of others?

Im blaming those who decided not to intervene in stopping the looting, ransacking, attacking and destruction of the civilian facilities. The US invasion force should of provided security for all of these areas. Instead all they done was to sit on their tanks blatantly ignoring the situation.. Major news networks even reported that US patrols were allowing robbers with looted goods through their check points..

Dil, as Justice pointed out on a thread elsewhere the U.S. would be accused of suppressing the Iraqi people if they had done that*, which I'm sure those accusations will be forthcoming since they are now able to start civil security measures. Could you imagine the reaction of the Arab world if the U.S. shot off riot gas and beanbags at the Iraqi looters?

None of these problems would be present if Saddam was still around I suppose.

*Their job at the time of the looting was combat, not to stop looters.

i am not certain i understand what’s going on here. :confused:

Yes, if someone blames the US forces for not sustaining law and order, for not devoting sufficient resources towards repairing water purification plants, in Baghdad and other cities in Iraq - is there something inherently unjust about that? It is a fact that the governments of the UK and the US were gung-ho about this invasion, they have been planning it for months - Iraq was on the US administration’s radar screen ever since 11 September 2001, approximately for a year and a half. Who else is responsible, if not the government of these two countries, for not having a sufficiently-sound strategy in place for when Hussein’s regime would be ousted ? In all of the military deployments and strategies, in all of the blueprints drawn up for which governmental buildings were located (and their geographical coordinates) in order to be aerially targeted, why was there not any strategy for dealing with the immediate post-Hussein Iraq ?

i wonder how many British and American engineers are serving in their respective militaries. i wonder how long it took to secure oil wells in Iraq.

Unless i am mistaken, under the Geneva Conventions, an occupying power (US, UK in this particular instance) have the legal responsibility and duty of ensuring civilian protection and rights. Only these two countries were adamant about committing an invasion against another sovereign nation. Now that the invasion has been committed and Iraqi cities are falling left right and centre - the responsibilities of the US and UK have just begun. You cannot invade a country and then shirk your duties towards the civilians of that country, particularly if you invaded them under the pretext of liberating them and providing for them a better system of governance than the previous one. :confused: The lack of logic behind this boggles the mind.

Humanitarian aid agencies warn of humanitarian disaster in Iraq, ABC [Australia], Michael Dodd, 12 April 2003

Looting, Chaos Cripple Aid Delivery in Baghdad, Disaster Relief

Like it or not the number one job during wartime is the security of the troops. They are not going to bring in their engineers so a sniper can pick them off. Who knew how the Iraqis would react? They reacted before the war was over, before security was obtained. The end stages of the war have caught everyone by surprised and adjustments are being made. Reports of inadequate water supplies, food supplies, and medical supplies let the military know what places are in the most dire need and they can act on that, so those reports are good. The anti-U.S. rhetoric does nothing...perhaps it allows you to blow off steam, which I suppose is also good.