Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

Washington -** Iraq gave up its weapons of mass destruction in 1991 and had no active chemical, biological or nuclear programmes at the time of the US-led invasion in 2003, the chief US weapons inspector concluded in a report released on Wednesday.**

Charles Duelfer, head of the US Iraq Survey Group, found that Iraq’s nuclear capability, far from being reconstituted as the United States had insisted before the war, was “decaying rather than being preserved” and would have taken years to rebuild, an official familiar with the report said.

This led him to give up stockpiled weapons and ultimately the programmes themselves, the official said.

“In terms of getting rid of weapons, by the end of 1991 they had gotten rid of just about everything,” said the official, who briefed reporters before Duelfer’s testified to congress on Wednesday.

Saddam clung to the capabilities to produce the weapons until as late as 1996 when the defection of Hussein Kamal, the Iraqi leader’s son-in-law, led to the discovery of a biological warfare programme by UN arms inspectors, according to Duelfer’s account.

His conclusions were drawn from documents, officials’ testimony and debriefings of Saddam Hussein.

“He was not loquacious on the WMD activities, but he certainly put into perspective how he viewed threats,” the official said of Saddam.
Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

Well well the biggest specialists in lying and fraud the CIA now admit there finally was no WMD’s in Iraq what a surprise NOT! thousands of iraqis dead billions wasted and now they saying there war was based on lies just tells you cannot trust the word of these amerikkkans because they nothing but bloodthirsty liars who wage war just to increase thier hegemony of the world!

Re: Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *
....Iraq gave up its weapons of mass destruction in 1991 and had no active chemical, biological or nuclear programmes ...
[/QUOTE]

So what was Hans Blix looking for? Saddams underwear?

p.s. you may come back and say Saddam didn't wear any underwear (like the leftie Zahra Nasim Khan). But then how do you know?

Re: Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *

Well well the biggest specialists in lying and fraud the CIA now admit there finally was no WMD's in Iraq
[/QUOTE]

What if they're lying about this, ak?

Wouldn't that be freakishly ironic?

Re: Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by ak47: *
....what a surprise NOT! .
[/QUOTE]

I like what you've done here. You're saying "what a surprise" followed by a "NOT!" Your trying to trick the reader by saying that such an admission is a surprise but then with the "NOT!" you’re in essence saying 'hey, this isn't a surprise, not a surprise at all!' What really sets this line off though is the fact that akkk47 tells us that the CIA was the one tricking the world before by saying Iraq did have WMD when in fact he says they knew Iraq didn't. But now who's trying to trick whom, the CIA or Akkk47?

Akkk47, the Houdini and trickster of the modern age, check his closet.

Re: Re: Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by antiobl: *

So what was Hans Blix looking for? Saddams underwear?

p.s. you may come back and say Saddam didn't wear any underwear (like the leftie Zahra Nasim Khan). But then how do you know?
[/QUOTE]

How do you know that he did?

This is old news.

Nothing new, everyone knew it that Iraq had no WMDs. Even the re-pubic-ans. Bush and his thugs will not only get away with this but also stay in Whitehouse for 4 more years.

Re: Re: Re: Iraq Had no Weapons Stockpiles or Nuclear Program, CIA Says

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ali_R: *

How do you know that he did?
[/QUOTE]

Ask your friends Hans or AK. Why did Hans need more time?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Agent Smith: *
Nothing new, everyone knew it that Iraq had no WMDs. Even the re-pubic-ans. Bush and his thugs will not only get away with this but also stay in Whitehouse for 4 more years.
[/QUOTE]

Damn right it is nothing new only the dimwit right wingers are making yet more excuses, strange the CIA now choose to say oh well we lied all along after all the destruction, death and misery the amerikkkans have caused to the iraqi people and this after the first gulf war with all the carpet bombings and 12 years of sanctions!

Saddam was brutal but he is nothing compared to the terrorist and fanatical amerikkkan regimes!

^right on

I guess the Americans want to admit to the lies they've been telling and look like the good guys once again, this is so they can target Iran's invisible weapons next. It makes me wonder whether the Americans have any shame at all?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Green & White: *
It makes me wonder whether the Americans have any shame at all?
[/QUOTE]

In a word NO!

It is no surprise, everyone knew that Bush was twisting the facts to hardsell his war. He thought the grand success would quell all the hard questions that may arise later. Now he is in a spot, but as usual he will go on with his denials and spin. But the hardest hit are the Iraqis, who get hit by Americans on one side and the terrorists on the other. The terrorists least care regarding the welfare of Iraqis, they are there because of their hatred of America. However strong one's opposition for the American invasion, the world now has to work with them to bring normality as fast as possible to Iraq and save Iraqis from hell.

Terrorists were their in iraq from before. they were there during the time of saddam Hussain so are there till now. RAHE RAHAEI KASAR SAUDIS FIRST AIDERS AND SYRIAN FAROOQ SHRAH"S COMPANIONS and other terrorists have completed. Killing shias left and right, doing their soul's Taza , karballa mein hussain kou marney ka maza lout rahein hein, yad yazed key satatei thei. ab bus chal saka. Bewaqouf americans say pala hei.

sara saman tou jung say pahlay he edhar udhar kar deya gaya tha. shayat blix khud he shamil hou ies transfer mei. kitna confident tha wou ka khouch iraq mein nahei hei. Kafee amir hou gaya hou gaya hou ga.

Idhar terroist martey hein udhar americans tikreek and falouja mein attack kartey hein hesab barabar hou jata hei.

Sub ka sub arabs dour say tamasha dekh rahei hein, bilkoul waeisay jaisay israel kou joush delakar palesteneans kou merwa rahay hei. Tael key qemat tou perh rahe hei. Un kou keya. ko ei marei ya jeye.

hum sub miskeen hein. Hartey hein or palestineans kou israel say laratey hein.Zalim neighbours of palestineans, and zalem neighbours of iraqis.

Palesteneans should be friendly with israel, since israel is an intelligent enemy and it should forget foolish friends---all arabs.

Same is true for iraq--they should be friendly with intelligent america and they should forget foolish terroists friends --neighbouring friends.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sokoon: *
Terrorists were their in iraq from before.

[/QUOTE]

No they were not. There is no evidence of that. All the insurgents came after the tumble of Saddam regime. Iraq had literally no border after the invasion.

Palesteneans should be friendly with israel, since israel is an intelligent enemy and it should forget foolish friends---all arabs.

Yeah go ahead tell a Palestinian Kid, whose whole family got killed by hands of Israeli soldiers, to be friend with Israelis. It’s easy for you to sit here and give such advice. But reality is little different.