Iraq brings in tough security law

A perfect scenario. Install a handpicked puppet government, get it to enforce tough laws which include taking away Iraqi’s human rights, while the masters sitting in America harp on about a new era and a democratic Iraq. Long live America. !!!

Iraq brings in tough security law](BBC NEWS | Middle East | Iraq brings in tough security law)

The Iraqi government has announced a law allowing it to impose emergency security measures.
Prime Minister Iyad Allawi signed the law on Wednesday giving the government the power to impose curfews, set up checkpoints and detain suspects.

But the measures can only be applied temporarily and in specific parts of the country.

There has been no let-up in violence, with street fighting and mortar attacks on buildings in central Baghdad.

Correspondents say that while the US-led coalition is already able to impose tough security measures, the law will give the new authorities a legal shield as it fights insurgents.

An interior ministry official told the BBC there had been extensive discussions during the drafting to avoid what he called “undue infringement of human rights”.

‘Patriot Act’

“We realise that this law might restrict some liberties but there are a number of guarantees within this law for the rights of people,” said Justice Minister Malik Dohan al-Hassan, as the law was announced at a news conference.

“The lives of the Iraqi people are in danger, they are in danger from evil forces, from gangs of terrorists,” said Human Rights Minister Bakhtiyar Amin.

Mr Amin described the law as being similar to the controversial US anti-terror Patriot Act.

BBC Middle East analyst Roger Hardy says that if the measures lead to human rights abuses that would certainly alienate many Iraqis.

But for the moment, he says, it looks as if most Iraqis are ready to give the prime minister a chance.

Interim President Sheikh Ghazi al-Yawar and other officials have signed the law.

Key points are as follows.

The government can impose curfews in violence-hit areas, but only in specific parts of the country.

It can conduct cordon and search operations and arrest individuals, particularly those found to be in possession of weapons.

It can intercept mail and eavesdrop on telephone conversations.

The government should state its reasons for declaring an emergency and specify the area where it is to be applied. It should also make the public aware of when these measures start and their duration.

The period of the emergency should not exceed 60 days, or be terminated if the reason for imposing it ceases to exist. The emergency will be subject to renewal after 30 days.

The prime minister is given the right to assign governors, including military leaders, to be in charge of specific areas.
Mr al-Hassan said the US-led coalition could help enforce the new law if the government requested it, but this would only happen in exceptional circumstances.

The justice minister also showed journalists a list of foreign fighters arrested during the insurgency.

All the fighters were “regrettably” Arabs, he said.

I agree. They should let the suicide bombers continue to blow up funeral processions. They should also allow for the continued murder of polcemen, destruction of infrastructure and disruption of services. We all know that is the path to freedom and democracy.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Seminole: *
I agree. They should let the suicide bombers continue to blow up funeral processions. They should also allow for the continued murder of polcemen, destruction of infrastructure and disruption of services. We all know that is the path to freedom and democracy.
[/QUOTE]

Isn't it a shame that tough security measures are being enforced to stamp out what you have stated, while those bombing and killing innocent women and children by the dozen everyday by helicopters, planes and tanks are free to roam the streets and continue to commit murder and mayhem. Yup thats why the handpicked puppet government was installed to provide them cover for their crimes.

Yeah, those crazy helicopter pilots, just shooting and killing civilians randomly. Murder and mayhem under the guise of providing security. :rolleyes:

I think "tough security" measures are probably what the good people of Iraq want right now....

Sometimes sarcasm reveals reality.

Yes, and sometimes it reveals the incapacity to know what the reality is.

tough security measures are better than anarchy. and I dont think that these measures give the powers to the govt which the govts ion many other countries dont already have e.g. ability to enforce curfew zones and times, set up checkpoints and wowzers detain suspects.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mawarid: *

Sometimes sarcasm reveals reality.
[/QUOTE]

You're thinking of satire. Sarcasm reveals stupidity. Satire reveals reality.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *
tough security measures are better than anarchy. and I dont think that these measures give the powers to the govt which the govts ion many other countries dont already have e.g. ability to enforce curfew zones and times, set up checkpoints and wowzers detain suspects.
[/QUOTE]

Spot on Fraudia. These new security measures at least are promulgated within the context of laws. Regardless of how "tough" they are, I'm sure they don't rise to the level that Iraqis became used to under Saddam. Where was it written that Iraqis could have their tongues nailed to a board and severed with a razor blade? Those security measures were done by dictatorial whim and fancy. These are being implemented consistent with a rule of law.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Seminole: *
Yes, and sometimes it reveals the incapacity to know what the reality is.
[/QUOTE]

Yup tragic the way some people could not fathom how the reality of the brave marines exploded in Flujjah and the high moral ground bit the dust in Abu Ghraib.

It's all in perception I guess. What I took from the Fallujah mess was the shock of the barbarity of the 'resistance' when they burned the victims, drug them through town and hung them from a bridge. What I got out of the Abu Ghraib controversy was that Muslims seem a lot more concerned about naked pyramid building than they ever were with the thousands that were tortured and murdered under Hussein. So please don't lecture about the moral high ground.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Seminole: *
It's all in perception I guess. What I took from the Fallujah mess was the shock of the barbarity of the 'resistance' when they burned the victims, drug them through town and hung them from a bridge. What I got out of the Abu Ghraib controversy was that Muslims seem a lot more concerned about naked pyramid building than they ever were with the thousands that were tortured and murdered under Hussein. So please don't lecture about the moral high ground.
[/QUOTE]

Oh, the incapacity to know the reality has now turned to perception. Well my perception of Falujjah is the nation claiming to have high moral ground pounding innocent women and children mercilessly and killing thousands there. No wonder you dont want to be lectured about the moral high ground. Ashamed are we?

well refresh my memory as it's hazy due to all those chemicals i'm forced to intake in my daily diet.. but wasn't Saddam Hussain doing the same thing? just the fact it's written somewhere you can detain anyone without cause makes it right now?

PA, try organic foods. It may clear up your thinking.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Seminole: *
It's all in perception I guess. What I took from the Fallujah mess was the shock of the barbarity of the 'resistance' when they burned the victims, drug them through town and hung them from a bridge. What I got out of the Abu Ghraib controversy was that Muslims seem a lot more concerned about naked pyramid building than they ever were with the thousands that were tortured and murdered under Hussein. So please don't lecture about the moral high ground.
[/QUOTE]

2 points

1) not many graphic images of saddam's atrocities were available and thus not broadcast so ppl did not see the barbaric nature of them to be up in arms about it. excposure is a key element..

2) Our actions should not be 1/100000th of the type f crap saddam pulled. we can not make excuses for actions in abu gaharab based on the brutality of his actions.