Iran Warns Nuke Deadline Could Backfire

They leave no choice…

Iran Warns Nuke Deadline Could Backfire

VIENNA, Austria - Iran warned that an Oct. 31 deadline to prove its nuclear aims are peaceful could backfire, suggesting Tehran could become even more secretive instead of opening its program for outside perusal.

The International Atomic Energy Agency’s board of governors voted Friday to approve a U.S.-backed resolution imposing the deadline on Tehran to clear up questions about its nuclear program.

Chief Iranian delegate Ali Akbar Salehi then walked out in protest. Iranian officials had repeatedly warned that imposing a deadline and insisting on other tough language in the resolution would aggravate nuclear tensions.

“We will have no choice but to have a deep review of our existing level and extent of engagement with the agency,” Salehi said, suggesting that Tehran might reduce or even break off links — moves that would doom inspection attempts.

Diplomats fear Iran might follow the lead of North Korea (news - web sites), which renounced the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in November and shut the outside world out of its secretive nuclear program.

If the next board meeting in November determines that Iran has not complied with the treaty banning the spread of nuclear arms, the noncompliance must reported to the U.N. Security Council, where reaction could range from formal criticism to economic sanctions.

The United States compared the situation to Iraq (news - web sites), noting that Baghdad had defied agency inspectors and hid plans to make nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction ahead of the spring invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein (news - web sites).

But diplomats at the meeting warned against seeking parallels between the neighbors.

And Salehi — whose decision to walk out in protest was a first in recent agency memory — accused the United States of provoking the protest.

“At present, nothing pervades their appetite for vengeance, short of confrontation and war,” he told the meeting. “It is no secret that the current U.S. administration … entertains the idea of invasion of yet another territory as they aim to re-engineer and reshape the entire Middle East region.”

“We reject the ultimatum in this draft,” he said.

The resolution, submitted by Australia, Canada and Japan, called on Iran to “provide accelerated cooperation” with agency efforts to clear up questions about Tehran’s nuclear program.

It also urged Iran to “ensure there are no further failures” in reporting obligations and called on it to “suspend all further uranium enrichment-related activities, including the further introduction of nuclear material” into a facility where U.N. nuclear agency inspectors found traces of weapons-grade enriched uranium.

The United States and other Western countries accuse Iran of working on a secret nuclear weapons program. They had been pushing for a resolution finding Iran in noncompliance, but gave up because of lack of support among board members.

Chief U.S. delegate Kenneth Brill said the threat by Iran to cut or end cooperation with the IAEA only “suggests they have something to hide that they do not want to come to light.”

In Washington, State Department deputy spokesman Adam Ereli welcomed the board’s action.

If Iran fails to answer agency questions by Oct. 31, “That would constitute further evidence of its ongoing activities to conceal its clandestine activities and its clandestine nuclear weapons program,” he said.

An IAEA report to the board noted that traces of highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium were found at an Iranian nuclear facility, and said tests run by Iran make little sense unless the country is pursuing nuclear weaponry.

Tehran insists its nuclear programs are designed to generate electricity and that its equipment was “contaminated” with enriched uranium by a previous owner.

IAEA director general Mohamed ElBaradei expressed confidence that Iran would comply with the agency.

“I think the board is sending a very powerful message of support to the agency’s work, to my work,” he said after Friday’s session. "It’s also sending a very powerful message to Iran that they need to cooperate fully and immediately and to show complete transparency

**
[quote]
The United States and other Western countries accuse Iran of working on a secret nuclear weapons program.
[/quote]
**

And we all know what happened the last time the US accused an Arab country of possessing WMD.

For as long as other countries in the region are being armed to the teeth, then i see no reason why Iran should not be allowed to do the same. It's self-defense. Until other countries are held up to the same standard, then singling out Iran makes no sense.

And anyways, after this last embarassing episode of accusing Iraq of WMD that, surprise surprise, have yet to be discovered, the US government is the last administration who has the right to start accusing other countries of possessing the same.

Bollocks.

Iran does not need to buckle to their demands. It is actually Isreal that should be under pressure right now for its terrorist tendencies and a well known secret nuclear program, controlled by zionist (modern day nazis).

But that is the unjust way of the world bully. It will get what it deserves!! And its blind public is just as deserving of punishment for falling for all that propaganda.

Iran has allways been a peacfull country, and has allways been on the defensive... in the Iraq led war, backed by the west. It only supports the opressed people of the world such as Palistine and previously lebanon. whose rights have been taken by the illegitimate child (isreal) of the west.

Isreal has shown its true colours again and agian. It has no right to exist.

Re: The reason Iran must be bombed

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
They leave no choice....

*The United States compared the situation to Iraq (news - web sites), noting that Baghdad had defied agency inspectors and hid plans to make nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction ahead of the spring invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein (news - web sites). *

[/QUOTE]

And we all have seen the massive cache of nukes that came out of Iraq, right? or the biological weapons?

The topic of this thread is very reflective of the mass ignorance and cowboyism that exists in the US. The desperation of George Bush Jr in wanting to hang on to a second presidential term is quite evident in all the ill-advised decisions and statements he seems to make all the time.

Looking at the past few decades, it is not Iran that is a threat- instead its the US itself that seems to love the idea of invading other countries on baseless evidences. SHAME!

I found this funny in its wording:

The quicker Iran develops it's nuclear programme the better.

At least that way we can have another Muslim country on a level playing field with real defensive powers that can actually be triggered in 45 minutes! and not some cock and bull story developed by Britain and US in order to justify an attack.

When Pakistan developed it's capability, the Mason movement tried everything in it's arsenal to try and keep the club exclusively non muslim. This is the list of the Nuclear club members: China, France, India, Israel, Pakistan, Russia, United Kingdom and United States with a question mark on North Korea.

No country in the middle east has more WMD than Israel and no other country in the world has escaped scrutiny of it's nuclear arsenal as has Israel. Israel has not even signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

When one looks for common factors shared by key government and media players who vastly exaggerate the threat from Muslim countries, one is immediately struck by the fact that virtually all these players have close ties to Israel.

The fact remains that Iran's nuclear programme is in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which states ' the benefits of peaceful applications of nuclear technology, including any technological by-products which may be derived by nuclear weapon States from the development of nuclear explosive devices, should be available for peaceful purposes to ALL Parties to the Treaty'.

And Iran is a signatory to the Treaty.

So the US believes the IAEA over what they have asked of Glorius Iran, but it ignored what they said about Iraq? Hypocrties.