Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

I was thinking on Iran nuclear deal and something came to my mind.

We all know that USA is the biggest power broker in this deal, and it is USA that was pressurising Iran so that Iran do not become nuclear as USA thinks (and rightly so) that nuclear Iran would be threat to Israel as well as could reduce Saudi Arabian influence in Arab world. Only way to keep Iran away from becoming nuclear was economical sanction, that USA was imposing on Iran using American influences across the world, plus using influence over world institutions like UN, IMF, World Bank, ADB, IB and so on.

After the deal, Iran would have opportunity to recover from sanctions and strengthen their economy. Obviously, they can delay their nuclear ambition for later days. On the other hand, I suspect that Iran is already nuclear and that also since long time. It is just like Pakistan was nuclear in early 80s, without any nuclear explosions.

Anyhow, purpose of my post is to ponder about Iranian nuclear deal, what could be the reason, and effects on Pakistan.

Reason: I think, there are reasons that pushed USA to make deal with Iran (disregarding opposition of Israel and KSA). USA intending to withdraw from Afghanistan in near future. The way Pakistan behaves, showing love for Taliban terrorists on one side, and American dollars on other, I do not think USA has trust on Pakistan. America once leave Afghanistan, obviously would like indirect influence on Afghanistan. Americans also would like to withdraw their forces peacefully, and as it looks like, their withdrawal using Pakistani land route may not be that peaceful (thanks to rhetoric of some parties including PTI).

Hence, I believe USA may have decided that instead of using Pakistan land route, they might love to use Iranian land route and that also peacefully. Something USA can do after making nuclear deal and peace talk with Iran. USA can also use Iran to keep their virtual presence and thus influence in Afghanistan. Thus, nuclear deal that USA went on regardless of opposition from Israel and KSA. Anyhow, with this nuclear deal, importance of Pakistan for USA would reduce as well as earning from transit facility.

On the other hand, there are opportunities for Pakistan too. Pakistan can now import oil, gas as well as electricity from Iran that Iran has in abundance and is capable to sell cheaply to Pakistan (cheaper than any other country).

Pakistan can also use Iran as land transit … maybe a rail line through Iran … or good road network (that Iran already have) to reach Turkey and through Turkey to Europe, increasing Pakistan export to European countries cheaply (as land route through Iran would be cheaper for Pakistan than sea route). It seems that Afghanistan would stay volatile as habit, and that means, Pakistan access to Central Asia through Afghanistan would always going to be hard. With Iran free from sanction, Pakistan can use Iran to reach Central Asian countries and thus increase trade there too.

Iran can also use Pakistan as transit route to export oil as well as gas to China (and possibly India), and that means good earning for Pakistan. Iran can also use this route to import goods from China (again Pakistan earning transit fees).

Iran is rich country. With reduce or no sanctions, Iran would start growing fast, and that means, would need skilled labour that Pakistan can provide (as Pakistan has skilled labour force but no jobs), and in this way lot of Pakistanis would get their livelihood from Iran.

**Please give your thoughts and comments. Thanks **

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

Having a nuclear deal does not mean Iranians are going to open their territory for NATO withdrawal or anything else.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

I think this would be good for Pakistan. US-Saudi nexus has destroyed Pakistan. Any US Iran alliance would remove US's reliance on Pakistan (vis a vis afghanistan), which also would be good for us as playing for the US/Saudis has only damaged us.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

It seems Iran is trying to sort out their economy and that is the reason they put their stubbornness on back seat. Pakistan do not want NATO to use Pakistani territory for transit and that means NATO would go for next available option that would be more safer for them too.

Pakistan is different from Iran. Pakistan love to beg and borrow (that Pakistan later try all means to get it written off), and then Pakistani politicians fight to loot what Pakistan got from begging and borrowing. But Iran love to earn and then use that to develop their country.

So for Iran, they would love to earn free dollars charging NATO transit fees, plus jobs that Iranian transport company would get. Workers and businesses on transit route and at seaport would benefit too, earning dollars, and that would be in addition to transit fees.

Here is report about India using Chabahar seaport for their trade to Central Asia and Afghanistan, and that means, all facilities are already there at Chabahar connecting seaport to Afghanistan by road, connecting Chabahar with Zaranj and from there to Kabul-Kandahar-Herat highway.

PressTV - Afghanistan eager for Chabahar port deal: Envoy
Afghanistan eager for Chabahar port deal: Envoy

Afghan Ambassador to New Delhi says his government is eager to sign an agreement with Iran and India for the transit of commodities to Afghanistan.

Shaida Mohammad Abdali has underlined the importance of Iran’s southeastern Chabahar Free Trade Zone in this regard.

Speaking to the Press Club of India on Sunday, Abdali said his country is keen to ink a trilateral transit agreement with Iran and India on Chabahar port that is meant to provide a route for trade with landlocked Afghanistan, India’s private news agency Indo-Asian News Service (IANS) reported.

Indian Ambassador to Kabul Amar Sinha had earlier stressed the significance of Chabahar port for the transportation of Indian goods to Afghanistan.

On July 17, Sinha said his country is not willing to use Pakistani territory for transit, stressing that Chabahar is the best option for that purpose.

Chabahar port – located 72 kilometers (44 miles) west of Pakistan’s Gwadar port – holds immense strategic and economic significanc for India.

The port is already connected to the city of Zaranj in Afghanistan’s southwestern province of Nimruz and can serve as India’s entry point to Afghanistan, Central Asia and beyond.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

On the plus side, this means it should be easier to get Iranian gas.

On the negative side, being in a diplomatically stronger position than it has been in the past will give Iran a better place to start from in any negotiation. Honestly, if Iran-West ties are normalized, then it would have been useful having Zardari still around as President - having a Shia face to present for Pakistan would be beneficial in dealing with Iran.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

Some people say that Zardari was not a Shia, maybe BB was due to her mother.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

Iran is stable as well, where as Pakistan’s Balochistan and KPK are unstable hence rendering Gwadar useless which should have offered competition to Chahbahar.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

haha. It's a joke. Right?
I won't expect this being said with a straight face. :)

Zardari may or may not be shia. What we know is that he IS corrupt. We should not expect people like him to do any good for the country. If politicians like him really were interested in improving Pakistan then there had lot more opportunities besides exploiting their supposed co-religionists in other countries.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

He's been gone for a couple of months now and there still isn't much evidence of any major corruption scandals under his tenure as President. Given the political stability that his rule brought.... he was far from the worst leader Pakistan has ever had.

Re: Iran nuclear deal, pros and con for Pakistan.

Its always an honor for Pakistan to serve Americans so I dont think they will stop NATO from passing through their territory.
But the difference between Pakistan and other countries with a sense of honor is that our leaders and army never like to 'earn' money. Instead they always settle for bribes or aid (which is another name for bribe).