Well things are going great for the Pan-Islamism. Here is another sad story, but many Pakistanis would continue destroying their own country in the name of long-dead Pan-Islamism.
?BBC Urdu? - ??? ??? - ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ???](مسجد پر حملہ، پاکستانی سفیر طلب - BBC News اردو)
Re: Iran blames Pakistan and Sunni Balochis for Zahidan mosque attack - 25 killed
Thus the attack this week in Zahedan is an integral part of a wide-ranging campaign of American-supported terrorism inside Iran – even if the “darksiders” in the U.S. security organs had no direct involvement or knowledge of this particular attack. When you are in the business of fomenting terror (see here and here), there’s no need for micro-management. You co-opt the armed extremists who best serve your political agenda of the moment; you slip them guns, money, intelligence, guidance – and then you turn them loose on the local populace.
Convergence and Continuity: The American-Backed Terror Campaign in Iran
Of course, it is no mystery why the attack on the mosque in Zahedan, a city situated at the strategic point where the borders of Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan converge, attracted so little attention in the Western press.
Every day, we are schooled relentlessly by our political and media classes to regard the Iranians, heirs to one of the world’s oldest and most sophisticated civilizations, as demons and subhumans, whose lives are of little account. This can be seen in the long-running debate over an attack on Iran, which focuses almost entirely on the advantages or disadvantages such an assault would pose for American and Israeli interests, and not at all on the thousands of human beings living in Iran who would be killed in the operation.
In any case, whatever its provenance, the attack on the Zahedan mosque serves a confluence of interests. For it comes not only at a strategic location but also at a strategic time: just two weeks before the Iranian presidential election, with the hardline incumbent, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, facing a strong challenge from two reformist candidates.
Of course, the very last thing that the militarists in Washington and Israel want to see is the election of a moderate in Iran. They want – and need – Ahmadinejad, or someone just like him, so they can keep stoking the fires for war. A moderate president, more open to genuine negotiations, and much cooler in rhetoric than the loose-lipped Ahmadinejad, would be yet another blow to their long-term plans. Because the ultimate aim – the only aim, really – of the militarists’ policy toward Iran is regime change. They don’t care about “national security” or the “threat” from Iran’s non-existent nuclear arsenal; they know that there is no threat whatsoever that Iran will attack Israel – or even more ludicrously, the United States – even if Tehran did have nukes.
May be may be not.
However Shia Sunni struggle should be first and foremost blamed on Iran-Saudi tussle.
With your line of reasoning, Ayatuallahs and Imam Kaaba are American agents.