Iran Air Flight 655

Iran Air Flight 655 “IR655” was a commercial flight operated by Iran Air, that flew on a Tehran-Bandar Abbas-Dubai route. On July 3, 1988, the flight was shot down by USS Vincennes on the Bandar Abbas-Dubai leg, which resulted in 290 civilian fatalities from six nations including 66 children. There were 38 non-Iranians aboard.

The first leg of the flight went as planned, and the plane, an Airbus A300B2, registered EP-IBU, left Bandar Abbas at 9:50am that day. It would have been a 28 minute flight. At that same time, the U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser, Vincennes, fitted with the AEGIS combat system, was nearby in the Strait of Hormuz, which the commercial airliner, flown by captain Mohsen Rezaian, would pass over. In command of Vincennes was Commander William C. Rogers III. At the time of the incident, Vincennes, in support of Operation Earnest Will, was within Iranian territorial waters, following an attack on and pursuit of Iranian gunboats.

What happened thereafter is still subject to debate.

According to US government accounts, Vincennes mistakenly identified the Iranian airplane as an attacking military fighter. The officers identified the flight profile being flown by the A300B2 as being similar to that of an Iranian Air Force F-14A Tomcat during an attack run. According to the same reports Vincennes tried more than once to contact Flight 655, but there was no acknowledgement. The official ICAO report stated that these attempts to contact Iran Air 655 were sent on the wrong frequency and addressed to a non-existent “Iranian F-14”. At 9:54am, with the civilian jet about 10 miles away, Vincennes fired a volley of two SM-2ER antiaircraft missiles. The first missile broke the aircraft in two and damaged the tailplane and right wing. After the engagement Vincennes’ crew realised that the plane had been a civilian airliner. This version was finalised in a report [1] by Admiral William Fogarty, entitled Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on 3 July 1988. This report is so far only partially released (part I in 1988, part II in 1993), a fact criticised by many observers.

Independent investigations into the events have presented a different picture. John Barry and Roger Charles, of Newsweek, wrote that Commander Rogers acted recklessly and without due care. Their report further accused the U.S. government of a cover-up.[2] An analysis[3] of the events by the International Strategic Studies Association described the deployment of an Aegis cruiser in the zone as irresponsible and felt that the expense of the ship had played a major part in the setting of a low threshold for opening fire. On November 6, 2003 the International Court of Justice concluded that the U.S. Navy’s actions in the Persian Gulf at the time had been unlawful.

Three years after the incident, Admiral William Crowe admitted on Nightline that the Vincennes was inside Iranian territorial waters at the time of the shoot down. This directly contradicted the official Navy claims of the previous years.

Throughout its final flight IR655 was in radio contact with various air traffic control services using standard civil aviation frequencies, and had spoken in english to Bandar Abbas Approach Control seconds before Vincennes launched its missiles. Vincennes at that time had no equipment suitable for monitoring civil aviation frequencies, other than the International Air Distress frequency, despite being a sophisticated anti-aircraft warship. Subsequently U.S. Navy warships in the area were equipped with dialable VHF radios, and access to flight plan information was sought, to better track commercial airliners.

Awarded Medals
While issuing notes of regret over the loss of human life, the U.S. government has to date not admitted any wrongdoing or responsibility in this tragedy, nor apologized, but continues to blame Iranian hostile actions for the incident. The men of the Vincennes were all awarded combat-action ribbons. Commander Lustig, the air-warfare coordinator, even won the navy’s Commendation Medal for “heroic achievement,” his “ability to maintain his poise and confidence under fire,” enabled him to “quickly and precisely complete the firing procedure.”[4] According to The Washington Post, 30 April 1990, the Legion of Merit, the U.S. armed forces second highest award, was presented to Captain Rogers and Lieutenant Commander Lustig on 3 July 1988. The citations did not mention the downing of the Iran Air flight at all. [5]

The incident continued to overshadow Iranian-American relations for many years. Following the explosion of Pan Am Flight 103, the British and American governments initially blamed the PFLP-GC, a Palestinian militant group backed by Syria, with assumptions of assistance from Iran in retaliation for Iran Air Flight 655.[6] The blame was later shifted to Libya.

The Flight 655 incident has often been compared to that of Korean Air Flight 007 interception by the Soviet Air Force in 1983.

Vice President George Bush declaresd a month later: “I will never apologize for the United States of America, ever. I don’t care what the facts are.”

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Libya downed PanAm?? world cried for 15 years...until qazzafi appoligised & handed over the suspects to britts...USA downed Iran Air in 1988....& Bush Sr said"I will never apologize for the United States of America, ever. I don't care what the facts are."...wow what double standards....

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

You wanna provide a link there Ajax?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Here is your link lolita:
http://www.x-moto.net/articles/Iran_Air_Flight_655

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Yea a big black eye for the U.S. and how it was handled, no excuse.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Iran was/is surely justified in taking military actions against the US and it's interests for this barbaric terrorist act against innocent Iranian civilians? Well America says it can retaliate for the murder of it's civilians, why not Iran?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

United States payed Iran $61.8 million in compensation Reza for this accident, it was not a terror attack.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Perhaps there is some reason Goliko chose to omit the following from his original post:

Compensation
On February 22, 1996 the United States agreed to pay Iran $61.8 million in compensation ($300,000 per wage earning victim, $150,000 per non wage earner) for the 248 Iranians killed in the shootdown.
http://www.x-moto.net/articles/Iran_Air_Flight_655

Generally you compensate the vicitms when you make a mistake.

Odd that this was from your original article, which of course you did not provide a link for until asked, and then you selectively edit out the compensation info and nothing else. Now what would the purpose of that be?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Haha, please $61 million dollars! Is that some kind of sick joke? That was probably less than the missile that shot down the airliner and killed hundreds of innocents of innocent Iranian’s. Underthedome, do you know whose side your country was actively taking in the Iran-Iraq conflict at that time?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

:yawn:

Anything else we can bring up from 20 years ago?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

ahhh, the average wage in Iran is about $70/month. So $300 thousand per person is about the equivalent of 350 years wages.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

A Tomahawk missile costs around 1 millions dollars, to suggest a $61 million missile was fired is a little ridiculous. Thanks for the offer on the Iran/Iraq war history lesson but I’ll pass.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

What is ridiculous is your callous disregard for the lives of innocent Iranian civilians. Do you think that each of the families of the 3000 killed on 9/11 should be paid 300k each, and we forget about it all? You want to deny the crime committed against the Iranian people, and just forgeti about it. Just like there are 3000 angry and mournful families out there in the states, there are hundreds of Iranian families with the same emotions. No amount of blood money will bring back their husbands, wives, parents or kids, but they have a right to seek retribution, and the Iranian government should on their behalf, if it so chooses.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Bring it on big boy. Let's see what ya got.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Bravado and denial, but no remorse for your military killing hundreds of innocent Iranian’s.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Somebody is a little shy on the concept of accident. The US paid a settlement because it was at fault in an accident. 9/11 was not an accident it was intentional. And generally civilized nations do not “retaliate” over accidents, no matter how stupid.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

I’m not denying siht. I’m just bored with your bravado.
What type of retribution do you have in mind? And what was the $61 million of not retribution?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Of course the US who was supporting Saddam at the time against Iran would say it was an accident. But Iran has refused to accept such lies.

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Then it shouldn't have accepted the money. And Iran govt has no business to speak of lies. They lie like others breathe air.

So, big boy. What retribution do you recommend?

Re: Iran Air Flight 655

Ummm better check your history a little. Iraq killed 37 US sailors in the Gulf the year before.

The Stark incident contributed to tensions in the Gulf. One more thing to thank Saddam for:

At 8:00 PM on 17 March 1987, a Mirage F-1 fighter jet took off from Iraq’s Shaibah military airport and headed south into the Persian Gulf, flying along the Saudi Arabian coast. An Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) plane, in the air over Saudi Arabia and manned by a joint American-Saudi crew, detected the aircraft. Aboard the USS Stark, a Perry-class frigate on duty in the gulf, radar operators picked up the Mirage when it was some 200 miles away; it was flying at 5,000 feet and traveling at 550 mph. Captain Glenn Brindel, 43, commander of the Stark, was not particularly alarmed. He knew it was fairly common for Iraqi and Iranian warplanes to fly over the gulf. Earlier in the day, Iraqi jets had fired missiles into a Cypriot tanker, disabling the vessel. But no American vessel had been attacked.

In keeping with standard procedure, Captain Brindel ordered a radio message flashed at 10:09 PM: “Unknown aircraft, this is U.S. Navy warship on your 078 for twelve miles. Request you identify yourself.” There was no reply. A second request was sent. Still no answer. Brindel noted that the aircraft’s pilot had not locked his targeting radar on the Stark, so he expected it to veer away.

At 10:10 PM, the AWACS crew noticed that the Mirage had banked suddenly and then turned northward, as though heading for home. What they failed to detect was the launching by the Iraqi pilot of two Exocet AM39 air-to-surface missiles. The Exocets had a range of 40 miles and each carried a 352 lb. warhead. For some reason, the sea-skimming missiles were not detected by the Stark’s sophisticated monitoring equipment. A lookout spotted the first Exocet just seconds before the missile struck, tearing a ten-by-fifteen-foot hole in the warship’s steel hull on the port side before ripping through the crew’s quarters. The resulting fire rushed upward into the vessel’s combat information center, disabling the electrical systems. The second missile plowed into the frigate’s superstructure.

A crewman sent a distress signal with a handheld radio that was picked up by the USS Waddell, a destroyer on patrol nearby. Meanwhile, the AWACS crew requested that two airborne Saudi F-15s pursue the Iraqi Mirage. But ground controllers at Dhahran airbase said they lacked the authority to embark on such a mission, and the Mirage was safely back in Iraqi airspace before approval could be obtained.

As fires raged aboard the Stark, Brindel ordered the starboard side blooded to keep the gaping hole on the port side above the waterline. All through the night the fate of the stricken frigate was in doubt. Once the inferno was finally under control, the Stark limped back to port. The Navy immediately launched an investigation into an incident that had cost 37 American seamen their lives. The Stark was endowed with an impressive array of defenses – an MK92 fire control system that could intercept incoming aircraft at a range of 90 miles; an OTO gun that could fire three-inch anti-aircraft shells at a rate of 90 per minute; electronic defenses that could produce bogus radar images to deceive attackers; and the Phalanx, a six-barreled gun that could fire 3,000 uranium rounds a minute at incoming missiles. Brindel insisted that his ship’s combat system was fully operational, but Navy technicians in Bahrain said the Stark’s Phalanx system had not been working properly when the frigate put out to sea. (Brindel was relieved of duty and later forced to retire.)
http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id344.htm