Yesterday Final between England and Windies shows that batting first was a right decision by Inzi. England folowed the same game plan as Pakistan did to stay on da wicket and score between 220-230 which is a fighting score keeping in mind paki strong bowling side.
But we loss wickets at regular intervals, yasir should hav stayed there after making 30+ , s malik should hav made some runs after playing almost 12 overs .
but WI won the toss and elected to field first...and im sure if England had won the toss they would have put WI in to bat as well...the point being...if u win the toss...you field first, simple.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by yaasir: *
but WI won the toss and elected to field first...and im sure if England had won the toss they would have put WI in to bat as well...the point being...if u win the toss...you field first, simple.
[/QUOTE]
Inzi was not expecting that low score from the team atleast they should touch 200 even then they hav a chance but 150 was difficult for them and i am dead sure if windies batted first they would hav scored 200+.
[QUOTE] Originally posted by YAaRrOo: *
Yesterday Final between England and Windies shows that batting first was a right decision by Inzi. **England folowed the same game plan as Pakistan did to stay on da wicket and score between 220-230 which is a fighting score keeping in mind paki strong bowling side.*
But we loss wickets at regular intervals, yasir should hav stayed there after making 30+ , s malik should hav made some runs after playing almost 12 overs .
My point is inzi was right in batting first.
[/QUOTE]
England didn't have the choice to bat or bowl first.
I'm kinda lost too. It was a different match, different day. Everybody including the commentators were talking about pakistan shouldn't have elected to bat first since it was definitely not a batting pitch. khair sab ki apni apni scoh i guess. mein kya keh sakti hoon