Re: ~ Interesting Convo
Student : Sir, you can have lots of heat, even more heat, superheat,
mega heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat. But we don’t have
anything called cold. We can hit 458 degrees below zero which is no heat, but we
can’t go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold. Cold
is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold.
Heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just
the absence of it.
there is no heat/cold concept in physics only molecules moving, friction and the subsequent heat…cold do not exist, as it is physically impossible to reach the absolute zero (-273.15°C).
**When Molecules move, the produce energy = heat. That exists. When there is a lack of heat, you have cold. **
Grade 9 science.
(There is pin-drop silence in the lecture theatre.)
**Student **: What about darkness, Professor? Is there such a thing as
darkness?
Prof: Yes. What is night if there isn’t darkness?
**Student **: You’re wrong again, sir. Darkness is the absence of
something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing
light…But if you have no light constantly, you have nothing and it’s called
darkness, isn’t it?In reality, darkness isn’t. If it were you would be able to
make darkness darker, wouldn’t you?
:rolleyes:darkness is the absorption of light, a black hole retains all light beam because the escape speed to black hole attraction is superior to light speed
**Definitions of darkness **
**dark: absence of light or illumination **
**an unilluminated area; “he moved off into the darkness” **
**iniquity: absence of moral or spiritual values; “the powers of darkness” **
wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn](Redirect Notice)
**Darkness is the absence of light. As a metaphor, it is also the lack of knowledge (ignorance). It is also associated with mystery and with unknown things. In Western tradition, darkness is also associated with evil, evil entities (such as demons or Satan), and Hell or the underworld (see Dark ages). The love of darkness is called lygophilia. **
Darkness - Wikipedia](Redirect Notice)
The amount of low-frequency, or corresponding lack of high-frequency, components of a sound. Reverberation from distant objects usually has fewer high frequencies and sounds darker than reverb from close objects. The opposite of brightness.
www.dilettantesdictionary.com/index.php](http://www.dilettantesdictionary.com/index.php)
relative darkness in a place that is being screened or blocked off from direct sunlight Part of the room was in shadow.
encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/shadow.html](Redirect Notice)
Be aware of the Black hole! :rolleyes:
Student : Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?
what is the need when some reasearchers have made experiments to observe evolutoin in their own labs…not everyone has PhD in biology:rolleyes:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/310/5756/1878
**Did you see the counter argument to the senses? Read the convo again, thats what the student is refferring to. **
**Hez referring to SEEING evolution. That rationally doesn’t exist. **
**So please provide me the skeleton of the HUMANAPE ancestory. That missing link which darwin failed to provide. **
**The theory of evolution was put forward as an imaginary hypothesis in the context of the primitive scientific understanding of the nineteenth century, and to this day it has not been backed up by any scientific discovery or experiment. On the contrary, all the methods employed to confirm the theory have merely proven its invalidity. **
**However, even today many people think that the theory is a proven fact, like the force of gravity or the law of buoyancy. Because, as stated at the beginning, the true nature of the theory of evolution is very different from what is usually supposed. For this reason, some people do not know what rotten foundations this theory has, how it is disproved by science at every turn, and how evolutionists are trying to keep it alive in its death throes. Evolutionists have no other support than unconfirmed hypotheses, biased and unrealistic observations, and imaginary drawings, methods of psychological suggestion, countless falsehoods, and sleight-of-hand techniques. **
**Today, such branches of science as paleontology, genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology have proven that it is quite impossible for life to come about as a result of chance and to emerge by itself from natural conditions. The living cell, it is commonly agreed by the world of science, is the most complex structure that mankind has so far encountered. Modern science has revealed that just one living cell has a much more complex structure and mutually interconnected complicated systems than a large city. Such a complex structure can only function if all its separate parts emerge at the same time and in full working order. Otherwise, it will serve no purpose, and will fall apart over time and disappear. We cannot expect that its parts developed by chance over millions of years as claimed by the theory of evolution. For that reason, the complex design in just one cell clearly shows that God created life. **
**However, those who defend materialist philosophy do not want to accept the fact of creation for various ideological reasons. That is because the existence and spread of societies living in the light of that beautiful morality that true religion offers to man by means of God’s commands and prohibitions is not in these materialists’ interests. Masses devoid of any spiritual and moral values suit these people far better, since they can manipulate them for their own worldly interests. For this reason, they try to impose the theory of evolution, which encourages the lie that mankind was not created but rather emerged by chance and evolved from animals, and to keep it alive at whatever costs. Despite all the clear scientific proof that destroys the theory of evolution and confirms the fact of creation, they abandon all reason and logic and defend this nonsense at every available opportunity. **
**It has actually been proved that it is impossible for the first living cell, or even just one of the millions of protein molecules in that cell, to have come about by chance. This has been demonstrated not only by experiments and observations, but also by mathematical calculations of probability. In other words, evolution collapses at the very first step: that of explaining the emergence of the first living cell. **
**Not only could the cell, the smallest unit of life, never have come about by chance in the primitive and uncontrolled conditions in the early days of the Earth, as evolutionists would have us believe, it cannot even be synthesized in the most advanced laboratories of the twentieth century. Amino acids, the building blocks of the proteins that make up the living cell, cannot of themselves build such organelles in the cell as mitochondria, ribosomes, cell membranes, or the endoplasmic reticulum, let alone a whole cell. For this reason, the claim that evolution brought about the first cell by chance remains the product of a fantasy based entirely on imagination. **
The living cell, which still harbours many secrets that have not been explained, is one of the major difficulties facing the theory of evolution.
http://www.harunyahya.com/articles/20questions02.php#q1
(The Professor shakes his head with a smile, beginning to realize where
the argument is going.)
**Student **: Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at
work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going
endeavour, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you not a scientist but a
preacher?
(The class is in uproar.) **false: read that: **http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/310/5756/1878
**False: Read this **
http://www.harunyahya.com/articles/20questions02.php#q1
Student : Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the
Professor’s brain?
(The class breaks out into laughter.)
Student : Is there anyone here who has ever heard the Professor’s
brain, felt it, touched or smelt it?..No one appears to have done so.
So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable,
demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, sir. With all due respect, sir, how do we then trust your lectures, sir?
(The room is silent. The professor stares at the student, his face
unfathomable.)
does any of them know about scanners??:cb: it can show the brain and proves its existence very easily:D…
**Again, please refer to his counter argument to the senses. OF TOUCHING, EATING, HEARING, SENSING, his brains. **
**Like he said about God. **
Prof: I guess you’ll have to take them on faith, son. what a stupid prof :rolleyes:
not the only one stupid 
**Student **: That is it sir.. The link between man & god is FAITH.