Re: inequality and its flaw
Dushwari,
A subjective analysis may not yield an argument strong enough to deny the wickedness of the relationship that causes nothing but bitterness; however an objective analysis may come up with a justification as to why human beings may linger on with this kind of relationship. Let’s look at the query objectively, but let’s go back a step and try to understand what relationship is, why human beings are humbled by the need to engage in a propinquity that may bring noting but distress and dejection.
The binding force behind human relationship may be a biological imperative, a cultural necessity, a family bondage, job formalities and regulations. Each of us lives in a society that is governed by a very complex fabric of human interaction, most of the time we are engaged in more than many different and often complex, often contradictory, and often unknown rules of the social system. It is clamant to understand human behavior and ability of an average human being to extract a false positive pertaining to a particular relationship that might have been a spillover from another thread of a complex nest of relationship.
Each type of relationship has a set of associated rules, both subjective and objective, where as objective rules are mostly defined, observed and documented, subjective rules are, principally, unconscious, undocumented, non palpable by the contending human beings and has a lot to do with the perception of an individual.
It is generally believed that an average human being would accept the consequences of negotiated rules of an engagement. The word “average” does not accommodate all those who pretend to accept the rules. Even among those who accept the consequences, the perception of the conceived causatum plays a vital role in the formulation of reaction.
It is clear that a negative attribute is, predominantly, an offspring of the objective rules of relationship, and to that we must also appreciate the fact that two human beings may or may not have same objective rules, expectations, of an intrinsic relationship.
Nature of each relationship also dictates the strength of subjective observation of the objective rules, without realizing and appreciating the fact that subjective analysis may have a cleft of miles between the two.
Unfortunately, there are no right cultures, no universally acceptable norms, no true philosophies of human social life. The more we get socially entangled, the more we are inspired, both positively and negatively, by, and vulnerable to external factors. A negative sentiment that we may present to one of our biological near kin may just be cascaded from an external factor, yet the perception, though a false positive that it may induce into the relation can be devastating. Understanding the perspective of the one who is a reason for the negative emotional sentiments is necessary to either settle or disengage the relationship.