**Had **Irfan Pathan bowled his first delivery of the Test at 9:45am who knows what a mess he might have created. With all the skullduggery, he still managed to snaffle three wickets in the first six minutes.
With 900 extra seconds, more millimeters of dew on the pitch, and a faster wind speed he could have easily sliced through the whole line-up, maybe even twice. Surely then one could have had a chance to see the first-ever first over double hat-trick in Tests.
…more](http://blogs.cricinfo.com/tourdiaries/archives/2006/01/nine_hundred_se.php)
:cb: If we go by “HADs and WOULDs and COULDS and IFs and WHAT IFs,” what IF Pakistan HAD won the toss and HAD put India to bat, it WOULD have… :rolleyes:
Why do some people have to whine so much:cb: that they look like a joker in front of everyone.
I guess they are getting ready for all the excuses they can come up with after the series.
Pakistan were still able to bowl them out at a lesser total on 2nd day, when the pitch was not that deadly. Imagine what would have happened if Pakistan had bowled first. Thank god we didnt win the toss otherwise they would have said that the whole series was engineered in a way so Pakistan can win it.
We all heard about the “character” of Indian team after scoring runs in the first 2 test. Did we hear similar stories about the charatcer of Pakistan team who were 39-6 at one stage and are now in a position to win the series, Inshallah. And than they complain that we call their media, bias.
We say the same ifs,buts,would,could..etc.. so don't really care about them ignore those people cuz those people only complain..blah blah. Enjoy the sport! Enjoy the victory!!! :D