Re: Indian state govt blocks TV channels after massacre expose
Sting operation are not accepted as a proof in any court.
For rest of your statement I do not find any reason to answer as nothing can convince you whether it is Godhra or any other terror act.
Do you think I expected any answer from you? :). Do you think that any logical and intelligent reply can come from ignorance? Obviously, those who are brainwashed and look at things with tinted brain do not have anything to say when truth is spoken. Since you do not want to accept the truth, no one can do anything about you. So, enjoy your ignorance of truth and arrogance that stops you knowing it.
From your post, I am 100 percent sure that you do not know what sting operation is. Probably you think that sting operation is to do with only movies or drama scripts.
Reality is that, when crime happens, to bring facts on surface, investigations are done. Results of all investigations are put in court and court accepts all such results as valid as long as they are convincing. Sting operation is also a method of investigation and result of any sting operation is 100 percent valid in court.
If confession is made due to sting operation, that confession is as good as criminal making confessing to anyone. If confession is recorded than that recorded confession is as good as any recorded confession.
If X killed Y. Z (with intention to expose X) introduces himself and develop close friendship or any sort of relationship with X. Due to trusting the friendship or relationship, X confesses to Z in details that he killed Y and how he killed Y. Z records that confession, rather make video of that confession, and produces that as proof in court claiming that X killed Y. Even if Z did not record the confession, still Z can now become witness of that confession in court. Now only an idiot would think that court would not accept that confession because Z fooled X in getting the confession. Such confession would stand in court just like any confession and could be used as proof that X killed Y.
X can contest in court against such confession as X can contest in court regarding any confessions, including confession in police custody. Nevertheless, confessions due to sting operation are more valid and true than confessions in police custody, as confessions in police custody could be due to police brutality, but confessions during sting operation are made voluntarily.
As for those who are mentally bias supporter of murderers and thugs like Modi, they would obviously cry foul. But their crook mentality is obvious, as when it comes to accepting confession due to sting operation that they consider valid, they would jump upside down to accept that, but would do all sort of summersault when sting operation exposes their own murderous mentality. For instance, these people would easily accept ‘cash for fatwa’ confession during sting operation in 2006, but not when Modi is exposed as murderer, terrorist, criminal, Indian traitor (kills innocent Indian citizen in the name of religion to create disunity and discord in India), and thug.