Isn’t this term slightly misleading? The food found in most ‘Indian’ restaurants is not widely eaten in India as most Indians are vegetarians. The main dishes found in standard Indian restaurants are of muslim origin, ie, kebabs, karahi, lamb, chicken and lots o’ good old meat. These are mostly Punjabi in origin and strictly speaking, we are talking Muslim Punjab, as Sikhs themselves are supposedly vegetarian.
The truth is, the food found in Indian restaurants is really Pakistani food. This stuff is widely eaten in Pakistan and it has it’s influences from the middle east through Turkey and Afghanistan. With an Indian influence of course. But as Indian restaurants only came about after partition, why aren’t they called Pakistani restaurants? The food is exclusively Pakistani if you look at it with an unbiased eye.
Let me kill another bird while I am here. Many Bangladehis having originally worked as chefs in these restaurants are now claiming the food is Bangladeshi. This is also nonsense. The staple diet of Bengalis is fish and rice. There is not too much of that served in these restaurants.
There was a very interesting article in the Observer a while back about the origins of food in Indian restaurants and the writer (I can’t remember his name)did conclude that by all rights they should be referred to as Pakistani restaurants. What do you Indians think?
For all those who don’t live in the UK I’m sorry for all this talk about food. Here it’s nearly time for Iftari so no hard feelings ![]()