Indian leaders arn't very Witty or funny ...lack sense of humour

India’s leaders aren’t very often funny – by Shashi Tharoor http://www.iht.com/articles/49438.html

NEW DELHI If the incidence of wit and humor in national politics is a fair indication of the health of a democracy, India’s could use a good laugh. Reviewing “Gandhi’s Passion,” Stanley Wolpert’s recent biography of the Mahatma, for The Washington Post, I found myself complaining that Gandhi’s puckish sense of humor is nowhere on display in the book. To illustrate the point, I recalled a couple of my own favorite anecdotes about the saintly statesman..
Asked once what he thought of Western civilization, the Mahatma replied, “It would be a good idea.” Upbraided for going to Buckingham Palace in London in his loincloth for an audience with the King-Emperor, Gandhi retorted, “His Majesty had on enough clothes for the both of us.” Neither remark figures in a book that averages half a dozen quotations per page..
But then the thought occurred to me that, even though Wolpert’s omission was worth pointing out, Gandhi was an exception. The Indian nationalist leaders and the politicians who followed them were in general a pretty humorless lot..
I have just begun work on a biography of Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first prime minister. He was a man of extraordinary intellect and vision. But dig deep into his writings and speeches, and you would be hard pressed to come up with a good joke..
Nehru’s daughter Indira Gandhi was no better. While researching my doctoral dissertation on her foreign policy, I read practically everything she ever said from 1966 to 1977. I came across only one line that was remotely witty. “In India,” she remarked once, “our private enterprise is usually more private than enterprising.” But from what one knows of the lady, the comment had probably been scripted for her..
In fairness, Nehru should be credited with one classic epigram. Reacting with undisguised culture shock to his discovery of America after a trip there in 1949, Nehru said: “One should never visit America for the first time.”.
The closest Indira Gandhi came to a good epigram was probably in her answer to an American journalist in 1971 about why she had refused to meet with Pakistan’s General Yahya Khan: “You cannot shake hands with a clenched fist.” It is a line with eerie echoes in the current situation in the subcontinent, but not exactly one to elicit a laugh..
Few of the other remarkable figures who have marched the Indian stage have left us much by way of one-liners to cherish. India has had its share of political buffoons, but buffoonery does not count as humor, any more than slapstick can pass for wit. The honorable exceptions one can identify are, alas, too few..
The sharp-tongued V.K. Krishna Menon, diplomat-at-large and defense minister, was known for his biting wit, but it was usually more biting than witty..
My late father, who knew him well in London, often used to recall the acerbic nationalist’s retort when complimented by a well-meaning Englishwoman on the quality of his English. “Of course my English is better than yours,” he said to the hapless lady, Brigid Brophy. “You merely picked it up. I learned it.” But where are the Indian equivalents of the great political wisecracks of other democracies? Despite the national penchant for sanctimony, one looks in vain for a parallel to Churchill’s comment about Sir Stafford Cripps, “There, but for the grace of God, goes God.” Or to the left-wing British parliamentarian’s describing a female education secretary as “the face that had sunk a thousand scholarships”..
Before India gained independence from Britain, the nationalist poet Sarojini Naidu made a classic comment about the Mahtama’s frugal lifestyle and his army of aides - “If only he knew how much it costs us to keep him in poverty.”.
Most Indians believe that their politicians have less reason than most to take themselves seriously. They have kept us in poverty too long. .
The writer, author most recently of

This ought to be humorous enough for seinfeld…Rotfl he he he

Advani gives clean chit to Gujarat govt


SUNDAY, MARCH 03, 2002 11:50:55 PM ]

HMEDABAD: Giving a clean chit to Gujarat government, Home Minister L K Advani on Sunday rejected the demand for handing over the state’s commercial capital to the army as three days of communal frenzy showed signs of abating except stray arson, looting and police firing. Advani also denied that the police played a passive role in the communal riots in Ahmedabad and other places since they had resorted to effective firing to check the violence that had erupted in the wake of an attack on the Sabarmati Express in Godhra last Wednesday.The Army was also rushed in the next 24 hours to assist the local administration. Referring to the opposition demand that the state should be handed over to the Army, he said it was an irresponsible statement particularly when the Army has been positioned to protect the borders.Addressing a crowded News conference after his visit to the scene of the railway tragedy in Godhra as well as violence-affected areas of Ahmedabad, Advani said 77 deaths due to police firing had been reported from several parts of the state so far.Advani joined Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee in condemning communal violence and said: It was definitely a blot on the nation.'' The communal flare-up in Gujarat spoilt the good track record of the coalition government at the Centre, he said.Asked whether the Godhra train tragedy was premeditated, he said: It seemed premeditated.‘’ As per his information based on a visit to the Godhra railway station and discussions with the officials, ``it was certain that there were some other elements behind the incident’'.The state government has already ordered a judicial probe to ascertain the facts of the gruesome incident and therefore it was not proper for him to comment on whether anti-national elements were involved in it, he added.He said state officials had told him in Godhra that at least four councillors of the Godhra municipality had been arrested along with some 80 persons in connection with the attack on the Sabarmati Express. He was not aware of their party affiliations, he said adding that the inquiry report would reveal the truth.He, however, maintained that the Godhra incident and

India’s could use a good laugh.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif

azad munna:

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

[This message has been edited by cool down (edited March 04, 2002).]

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/06/opinion/06THAR.html?todaysheadlines
India’s Past Becomes a Weapon

By SHASHI THAROOR
] 'll tell you what your problem is in India," the American businessman said. “You have too much history. Far more than you can use peacefully. So you end up wielding history like a battleaxe, against each other.”

No not a good joke but a lighter way of look ar indias dilemma rightfully


Main Akela he chalaa thaa janib-e-manzil magar
Log saath aatey rahey aur Carvaan Badhta gaya