Indian Company Stretches Fixed Wireless Phone Technology to Make Cellular Network

Sometimes, the simplest of ideas yield the most magnificent of things! This was one such project, which was underminded by the Government at first… Proved to be super!!!

Taken from the IEEE Spectrum

http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/spectrum/jul03/departments/nind.html

By Seema Singh

A novel way of providing plain old connected telephone service wirelessly is concocted in Chennai (Madras)

1 July 2003—No copper? No problem. Systems for connecting customers to the telephone system wirelessly rather than by means of the tried-and-true copper loop can be an attractive option in areas that have yet to set up a copper infrastructure. One such system, developed at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)–Madras (Chennai), is being extensively deployed in rural parts of India and has already attracted serious interest in a dozen other countries, including South Africa, Brazil, Russia, Egypt, and Iran.

Methods of providing local telephone service via radio connections to the home or office are generally referred to as “fixed wireless” in the United States, or “wireless in local loop” in India. The IIT system, called corDECT, was developed by a telecommunications and computer networking group under Ashok Jhunjhunwala, a professor of electrical engineering.

“At about [US] $200 per subscriber unit, corDECT is much cheaper than the $500 per fixed line connection [it costs] basic operators [to provide service], especially in suburban and rural areas,” claims Jhunjhunwala.

CorDECT derives its name from the Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications standard (DECT) of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI, Sophia-Antipolis, France). ETSI defines the air interface for users in the1880–1900 MHz range. It purports to be the world’s only fixed wireless technology offering simultaneous voice and Internet data.

There are four basic elements of the system. At the subscriber’s end is a terminal or wall set that links the subscriber wirelessly to a relay base station up to 10 km away. The wall set in the subscriber’s home is an intelligent device that searches for access to the strongest base station among many, and latches on to the quietest channel through a dynamic channel selection procedure. It can be connected to any standard telephone, modem, or fax machine.

The relay base station then transmits the signal as far as another 25 km to a so-called compact base station, a wall-mounted unit capable of serving 30-70 subscribers and connecting to a DECT interface unit. In effect, each DECT unit is a kind of super base station, linking a maximum of 20 compact base stations to the voice and data infrastructure.

A delayed takeoff
India’s communications authorities initially were slow to recognize the merits of the country’s homegrown fixed-wireless technology, in part perhaps because of an ill-conceived notion that rural India needed only standard telephony and no Internet capability. The Department of Telecommunications (Delhi) ignored corDECT, while the state-owned telecom owner placed large orders for imported products with arguably less impressive features.

The emergence of Reliance Infocomm Ltd. (Mumbai) with a bold plan to make corDECT the basis of a “limited mobility” cellular network, in addition to a “wireless in local loop” system, has done much to change the dynamics [see “Indian company stretches fixed wireless phone technology to make cellular network,” IEEE Spectrum, July 2003, pp. 16-17]. Reliance is installing 1.5 million lines in 1450 sites in the country.

Meanwhile, the Indian government has commissioned about a million corDECT lines and their accompanying infrastructure. It is also being deployed in the country under various programs for rural connectivity, including the Rural Access to Services through Internet (RASI) program, a joint effort of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Center for International Development at Harvard University (both in Cambridge), the I-Gyan Foundation (Boston), and IIT–Madras.

One of the notable examples of corDECT being used for local needs is the effort by a spinoff of IIT-Madras, n-Logue Communications Private Ltd. (Chennai). This venture-funded start-up has connected 500 villages in its first year of operation and is aiming to connect another 15 000 villages with 50 million people in its second year.

According to n-Logue chief executive officer P.G. Ponnapa, the system already is being used for everything “from providing expert advice about diseases affecting crops to providing e-mail connections to relatives living abroad or in cities.” Among other things, n-Logue has combined with a private bank to bring rural, low-cost automatic teller machines to villagers.

Based on what n-Logue has accomplished, Jhunjhunwala says, just “give us $32 million annually for three years and we’ll wire up all of rural India.”

Seema Singh writes about science, technology, and business, from Bangalore, India.

Thanks for the informative post, Spock.

I hope the government makes good use of this technology now, to wire-up all the villages. It will be a significant step forward in improving the quality of life of the rural populace.

Thanx for sharin.......real nice stuff !!

India has a good cellular structure, with some companies dropping their prices to Rs. 1.2 per min with no tax prepaid, and thats an amazing deal. However, I was surprised to see that the largest network in India, maybe it was bharti telecom, was charging 1.99 per minute and had the largest amount of customers... Maybe they provide better service...

Hi Spock,

The rates for pre-paid are significantly higher than for post-paid. This difference has increased recently, as all the operators are trying to convert the pre-paid subscribers to post-paid.

If you are interested in the post-paid rates, here are Bharati’s:
http://www.airtelworld.com/connections/postpaid.htm

What are the typical pre-paid rates in Pakistan?

Rohit

Rohit, its interesting that the cell phone market in India wants to transform the subscribers into post-paid. Well, this would be better for them, but the people would prefer having pre-paid connections than having to pay line-rent etc every month.

In Pakistan, all the companies started with post-paid and then one particular company started the concept of pre-paid. However, post-paid was pretty expensive, and I remember from 1996 to 2001 I had to pay like Rs.600 monthly and I did not usually exceed my quota of 50 free minutes. However, in 2001, I reverted to Mobilink (formerly owned by Motorla, than Orascom) and got their prepaid connection. Now in prepaid I can get a scratch card of Rs. 650, and all incoming calls are free, and the card is valid till 6 months, so its an excellent deal. After making one call I get Rs.9 deducted (approx) which includes tax and everything, but still if you use it for incoming, its virtually free and has no line rent at all. However, there was a big boom in the cell phone industry due to this and there were too many connections giving away which caused service congestion problems, so further connections were stopped, until this mess was cleared up.

Compared to what you gave me on the post-paid, pakistans post paid packages are very cheap, and our validity date on even the Rs. 635 card is 6 months, compared to 1month on airtel.

http://www.airtelworld.com/rechargemagic/magicdetails.htm

This is mobilink, the package I have…

http://www.mobilinkgsm.com/jazz/temp3.htm

Hi Spock,

I really like the 6-month validity idea. In India, as you pointed out, the scratch cards are valid for much shorter durations. I use prepaid cards of the “Orange” brand (by Hutchison Max Telecom Ltd). Their packages are listed on this page: Corporate Website of Orange

Al of these are quite expensive compared to the card you use. but on the other hand, the charges for a single call are much less … nowhere near Rs. 9.

In India too, the companies started with postpaid connections, but added prepaid ones to increase their customer base. Initially, the prepaid plans were very cheap; I too shifted from post- to pre-. In fact, airtime was so cheap that cellphones became a mass commodity. One can literally sometimes see even truck drivers carrying mobiles. :slight_smile:

Anyway, this prepaid-centric strategy was not good for the operators’ health in the long run, and so these days they are trying to convert as many subscribers into as possible into postpaid.

As for service, that is decent. A few days ago, due to heavy traffic, delivery of SMS messages had become very erratic. But after three or four days of this problem, things returned to normal again. It looks like the operator invested in increasing their network cpacity. Good. :k:

Same problems happened in Pakistan. They initially had SMS totally free on the prepaids, and it got abused alot. They also gave the option of adding one or two numbers to which you can make totally free calls to nationwide, and I personally know people who would plug their batteries and talk all day, because of which this facility had to be suspended. They also made SMS messaging Rs. 2 per message. Also, I was wondering if phones are cheap in India as I heard nokia was manufacturing some models over there; in Pakistan they are pretty cheap as people on their way to the UAE bring them in (smuggling, sort of).

Spock, the similarities continue. :slight_smile: In India too, free SMS was offered for a limited duration, and later on its rates were hiked (to Rs. 1.5 though). And, the “free calls to one phone number” facility was also withdrawn recently. :slight_smile: Looks like the people of the two countries are nearly the same in their natures. :flower1:

About prices of phones, I can tell you some prices I know, but I don’t know whether these are comparatively cheap or not:

  • Motorola T180 (or 190): Rs. 3000
  • Nokia 3310: Rs. 4,000
  • Nokia 7650: Rs. 20,000
  • Nokia 3650: Rs. 21,500
  • SonyEricsson P800: Rs. 40,000

Smuggled phones are easily available in India too, and infact most people buy those only. The above rates are all “grey market” ones. There are many Indians too in the Gulf, and of course, in the US and UK also … :slight_smile:

Well, you would be surprised to know that the phones in Pakistan are roughly the same price as well, but then agian, Indian currency is slightly more than that of Pakistani currency.

I bought a Nokia 3330 (very similar to the 3310) for Rs. 3800, new.

Also, are there any providers in India that use technology other than GSM? In Pakistan, it first started off with three companies, where two companies were TDMA, and one was GSM. Ultimately, people started shifting to GSM, and the TDMA operators now are going to expand there services and also offer GSM services.

Hi Spock,

My knowledge of the various network types is a bit shaky, but here goes:

Most of the cellular service companies in India are GSM ones. Recently however, a compay called Reliance Infocomm has launched CDMA-based WLL phones. Reliance's service is a 3G one, so that is a significant first in the Indian mobile scene. In the near future, another company called Tata Teleservices is also about to launch its CDMA-based WLL service, and I guess it will try to compete as closely as possible with Reliance.

On a slightly different note, some GSm operators also provide GPRS services ... About TDMA, I know nothing. :)

I hope I answered your question. :)

Edit: It seems that Tata has already launched its services, but in only five cities, in a very low-key manner.

Hmmm ... Maybe I should read the business pages of the newspapers more often ... :)