Indian Bags Nobel Prize for Literature

========================================================================================== http://www.rediff.com/us/2001/oct/11nobel.htm

V S Naipaul bags Nobel Prize in literature
Trinidadian English writer of Indian origin, VS Naipaul, added another feather to his already crowded hat, when he bagged the

Nobel Prize in Literature for 2001.

A Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences press release said he bagged the award ‘for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories’.

=============================================

Good work Naipal

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

We are Proud of you.

He was born in trinidad,he never was an Indian ,in fact he loathed Indian religion to culture.His wife is ex Pakistani born,Nadia now british citizen.

AS WITH SELECTION OF MOST NOBEL,AFTER BEING ON THE LIST FOR MANY TIMES NAIPAUL,WHO WROTE ALL SORT OF BS ABOUT INDO PAK MUSLIMS.GOT HIS NOBEL AFTER SELLING HIMSELF RIGHT & LEFT TO THE ESTABLISHMENTS

V.S. Naipaul Awarded 2001 Nobel Prize in Literature

October 11, 2001

Trinidad-born British writer V.S. Naipaul won the 2001 Nobel
prize in literature, the Swedish Academy said on Thursday.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/11/arts/11CND-NOBE.html?ex=1003803818&ei=1&en=a6ec5a57f6f0c9c5

Vidiadhar(Vidyadhar) Surajprasad Naipaul is of Indian ancestory. He was born in Trinidad which has a large Indian population. He is now a British citizen.

"It is a great tribute to England, my home, and to India, home of my ancestors and to the dedication and support of my agent Gillon Aitken." said Naipaul when he won the Nobel prize.

Naipaul, long rumored as a Nobel candidate, is the first writer of Indian descent to win since Rabindranath Tagore in 1913. He said receiving the prize was a ``tribute both to India, my ancestors' land, and to other countries in the subcontinent.''

Naipaul, 69, was born in Trinidad to parents of Indian descent. Naipaul - who writes in English - is also famous for writing A House For Mr Biswas and A Bend In The River.

The 69-year-old novelist and short story writer, who left Trinidad at the age of 18, presents impressions of the country of his ancestors, India, and critical assessments of Muslim fundamentalism in non-Arab countries like Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia and Pakistan in two well-known works, according to the citation.

In a recent interview, he mocked E.M. Forster, author of A Passage to India'' and other novels.He just knew the court and a few middle-class Indians and a few garden boys whom he wished to seduce,'' Naipaul told the Literary Review. He also took on James Joyce's Ulysses,'' saying thatJoyce was going blind and I can't understand the work of a blind writer.''

His most famous book, at least for the Indian audience, A House for Mr Biswas followed, putting him on the fast track to literary greatness.

The press release described the book thus: "One of those singular novels that seem to constitute their own complete universes, in this case a miniature India on the periphery of the British Empire, the scene of his father's circumscribed existence.

Some of the selected works of V S Naipaul:

India : A Wounded Civilization. London: Deutsch, 1977.
India: A Million Mutinies Now. London: Heinemann, 1990.
A House for Mr. Biswas. London: Deutsch, 1961.

Sanam lets then say :

Husband of a woman of PAKISTANI origin wins Nobel Prize

HAPPY NOW !!
and who told you about Naipaul's hating Indian culture.. If anything , Naipaul has often praised BJP for its HINDU philosophy.....

mr naipul is one of top muslim bashers and infact after the 9/11 attacks mr naipaul quote said" islam has to answer this"
and they have given award to this anti muslim man

You dont want to hear what Naipaul said about BINDI on indian ladies head

Naipaul said"Because they have nothing else inside the head" …they put bindi on forhead !!!

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/dixsi.gif

Yes you can think anything you want ,By going to Pakistan & marrying thee he showed his PREFERENCE over India & you might think he praises BJP ,Thats the kind of fickle opinion he is That has nothing to do with his Language skill for which he got Nobel.
He is good for emulating as writing English but not his IDEAS which are foolish

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/silly.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/silly.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/silly.gif


Bik Gaya Jo Woh Kharidar Nahi Ho Sakta

Kabir,

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

There are manyNon Nobel writers particularly in non English literature that Nobel doesnt bother with ,from Swahili To Urdu.

WE would read Naipauls good literature without having none Nobel or Not .BUT to say few days after Bush Declares Islam to be with his Operation Enduring Peace or be against it ,is too much coincidence when we know Europe is colony of master USA these days.

I believe that the award of the Nobel Prize to Naipaul
is politically motivated.

We are living in Orwellian times, Oceania perpetually
at war with either Eurasia or Eastasia: The face of
the enemy changes periodically: yesterday it was the
Communists, today it is the Muslims. And as we watch
in horror, the “War on Terror” gets transformed into a
“Clash of Civilizations”: The West vs Islam.
And in this “holy war” there can be no doubt as to
who’s “Good” and who’s “Evil”, who’s “Right” and who’s
“Wrong”.

There is an assymetric war being fought by David and
Goliath: The terrain is Afghanistan: Consent needs to
be manufactured, Conscience needs to be Subdued. And
Naipauls’s “Among the Believers” and “Beyond Belief”
become convenient Propaganda Weapons to undermine the
Just Grievances behind the Islamic jihad (however
despicable the ways of their leaders).

President George Bush issued a warning: You are either
with “us” or against “us”. And the Swedish Nobel
Committee, in confering the Literature award on
Naipaul, has taken clear sides.

If the Binladens are being denounced by the world for
promoting a Distorted version of Islam, then Naipaul
too has been guilty of presenting a Warped perspective
on Islam. Yet, it is typical of the Hypocrisy of the
West that it declares a Search Warrant: Dead or Alive
for bin Laden and his Muslim-fanatic associates while
awarding Naipaul for strengthening the case of “us”
against “them”.

We are living in dangerously divisive times, with very
real risks of the “terrorist” crisis flaring into a
“crusade” vs “jihad”. By recognizing Naipaul at this
crucial historical juncture, the Nobel Committee, has
done the civilized world a disservice: instead of
promoting a critical understanding of the bewildering
interdependence of our times, it has opted for an
irresponsible furthering of the great divide.

regards


barque(bijli) yoon akadti hai apne karname pe ke
jaise phir naya hum aashiyaan bana nahi sakte