Indian Army To Deploy Prostitutes As A Women Battalion In Held Kashmir

Society Pakistan & World Affairs
61

Oh he will provide one zillion trillian sources from of course you know where, but when you ask him to provide a link to UN for the resolution in question, like all good Indians he is gone.. :D

Happy happy joy joy...

62

You see when you provide the required link ... you start running from discussion .... now you know what i have written and i have done this before also .... i will provide a link for each and every thing that i have said in my previous link ... are you ready for it .... please once again dont run away once i provide the links for what i have said before !!!!

63

yes please provide a link to UN with resolution in question.. thankoo...

64

What is have said … what is written in the UN resolutions

(l) As the presence of troops of Pakistan in the territory of the State of Jammu and Kashmir constitutes a material change in the situation since it was represented by the Government of Pakistan before the Security Council, the Government of Pakistan agrees to withdraw its troops from that State.
(2) The Government of Pakistan will use its best endeavor to secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistan nationals not normally resident therein who have entered the State for the purpose of fighting.
(3) Pending a final solution the territory evacuated by the Pakistan troops will be administered by the local authorities under the surveillance of the Commission

Again look at the third point … clearly states what is to happen in the territory vacated by Pakistani troops. So what is required by Pakistan to do … vacate Kashmir C O M P L E T E L Y …

Then what is India’s role …

(1) When the Commission shall have notified the Government of India that the tribesmen and Pakistan nationals referred to in Part II A 2 hereof have withdrawn, thereby terminating the situation which was represented by the Government of India to the Security Council as having occasioned the presence of Indian forces in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and further, that the Pakistan forces are being withdrawn from the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Government of India agrees to begin to withdraw the bulk of their forces from the State in stages to be agreed upon with the Commission

So when the tribal Pakistanis have left and this is informed by the Commsion to India … next step … but the questions is did that happen, did Pakistan “remove” its nationals from Kashmir … the simple answer is NO !!

65

Re: Indian Army To Deploy Prostitutes As A Women Battalion In Held Kashmir

Incorrect. That is not a UNSC resolution.

66

Trying to wriggle out of this … so what is your beef against these UNCIP resolutions!!! Incidently both India and Pakistan agreed to them … Here is UNSC establishing the resolutions of UNCIP …

RESOLUTION 80 (1950) CONCERNING THE INDIA-PAKISTAN QUESTION, SUBMITTED BY THE REPRESENTATIVES OF CUBA, NORWAY, UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED STATES AND ADOPTED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 14, 1950. (DOCUMENT NO. S/1469), DATED THE 14TH MARCH 1950)

Having received and noted the reports of the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan establishing its resolutions 39 (1948) of 20 January and 47 (1948) of 21 April 1948,

Last time Kashmir was discussed in UNSC … before the 1965 war …

http://www.kashmiri-cc.ca/un/sc2dec57.htm

*RESOLUTION 126 (1957) ADOPTED BY THE SECURITY DUNCIL AT ITS 808TH MEETING ON 2 DECEMBER, 1957

Observing further that the Governments of India and Pakistan recognize and accept the commitments undertaken by them in the resolutions of the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan dated 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949, which envisage the determination of the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the will of the people through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, and that Mr. Jarring felt it appropriate to explore what was impeding their full implementation

… will wait for your response :smiley:

Yeh to kaa hain...
67

AB, you are genius thats all I can say, :) So you have no link to UN web site with resolution in question.... just as I though.... Go back up and read again what I said and what it means.

T20 World Cup 2014
68

Security Council Resolutions

Check for each of the listed above …

1957 UN resolution … http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/131/30/IMG/NR013130.pdf?OpenElement

Here is some more

Observing that the governments of India and Pakistan haev aacepted the provisions of teh United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan resolutions of 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949 and have reaffirmed their desire that the futire of the state of Jammu & Kashmir shall be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebisicite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.

http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/072/10/IMG/NR007210.pdf?OpenElement

69

Re: Indian Army To Deploy Prostitutes As A Women Battalion In Held Kashmir

this is just a made up story by some perverts. The photo shows a NCC group.
It is pathetic that some deceitful perverts will label innocent children this way.

70

Re: Indian Army To Deploy Prostitutes As A Women Battalion In Held Kashmir

Lets get two things straight. You are actually saying that a UNCIP resolution is a UNSC resolution?

Secondly do look into if India voted in favour of these resolutions or abstained. You don't have all your facts straight like always.

71

It's defintely in interest of both countries to sit and talk but India doesn't even consider KASHMIR as a dispute or a problem. They want everyone to pretend that kashmir is not even an ISSUE.

I agree, we should learn from India in this case. India lost it's land to China but they don't make any noise about that as they know who is their daddy. Pakistan being 8 times smaller country should understand that it cannot use force to resolve this issue.
As i said earlier, Indians know very well that kashmir should have never been part of India with massive muslim population so all they can say in the end is "what can you do about it???".
Unlike India, pakistan still didn't hesitate to use force against it's bigger rival (aggressor)but i don't believe a war can be solution to this problem.

72

So still nothing..! HuH!! CM, I am done you can have some fun :slight_smile:

Pakistan V Windies. H/L post#450
73

UNCIP is a commmision by the United Nations Security Council specifically to look into the question of India and Pakistan (again can provide link for this , if you have a doubt) ..... it has been noted by UNSC ..... In any case, as i have shown in UNSC resolution of 1952 refers to UNCIP resolution as the way forward. As i said trying to wriggle out of a situation.

Well then tell me what is the UN resolution that is binding on Kashmir, let us do it that way ...... let me have your side of the story as to what is the UNSC resolution on Kashmir.

74

Said it right in the beginning .... you will run away as soon as i provide the links :D

75

you are lot of noise and beat around the bush...

76

This is the kind of nonsense which is spread around in Pakistan … proof … Lahore declaration … read it for yourself and decide. And what did Pakistan do after this, it responded by attacking Kargil, WHY, the generals wanted to highlight Kashmir … and now 10 years later you realize the general was taking you all for a royal ride !!!

http://cns.miis.edu/inventory/pdfs/aptlahore.pdf

Everytime Pakistan has used force … it has suffered for it … Be it in 1965 when its plan for Kashmir was foiled, be it Siachin - held by India or be it Kargil, where the “dignity” of the armed forces of Pakistan was saved by the then PM :D.

India went IN only once … and you know what happened. China might have been able to wrest some uninhabited areas from a country which was not prepared for any war … Pakistan lost half its country and they had been getting ready for war right from day one !!! Chew that for some time.

77

Talk should have substance ..... read you last 4 posts and read my last 4 posts .... you will know what happened here :D

78

You didn't answer the question. Reread and respond properly. Also the UNSC noted the statements by the Government of Pakistan and India. Does that make those two speeches UNSC resolutions as well?

My side is well known. Its the factual one. You have to prove your contentions, considering your government did not vote in favour of the two resolutions you have linked.

79

As i said trying to wriggle out of a tight spot :smiley: … Chew on this and hope you are able to grasp what this UNSC resolution is saying …

http://www.kashmiri-cc.ca/un/sc2dec57.htm
*RESOLUTION 126 (1957) ADOPTED BY THE SECURITY COUNCIL AT ITS 808TH MEETING ON 2 DECEMBER, 1957

Recalling its previous resolutions and the resolutions of U.N.C.I.P. on the India-Pakistan question;

  1. Requests the Government of India and the Government of Pakistan …
  2. Requests the United Nations Representative for India and Pakistan to make any recommendations to the parties for further appropriate action with a view to making progress towards the implementation of the resolutions of the U.N.C.I.P of 13 August 1948 and 5 January and towards a peaceful settlement

Again if you have understanding of basic english … UNSC resolution 158 specifically is asking for the “implementation” of UNCIP resolutions …

Your side is as ambigious as Pakistan’s position on Kashmir … till now i haven’t seen a single piece of "statement " or “document” …

All you have done is provide cover for mo293 to run away from here :smiley:

80

Re: Indian Army To Deploy Prostitutes As A Women Battalion In Held Kashmir

Again the question was - are you saying the UNCIP resolution is the same as a UNSC resolution.

Its odd that I am running since I am asking a simple question yet you refuse to answer it.