India was in no position to fight a war: paper

http://www.dawn.com/2002/06/15/top14.htm
.
.
.

**India was in no position to fight a war: paper **

NEW DELHI, June 14: At least a month before war drums resonated over the border, the Indian military high command had told the parliamentary standing committee on defence that the country had only a wafer-thin edge over Pakistan in terms of military capabilities , and that it would be unwise to go to war, **The Times of India reported on Friday. **

It quoted a prominent member of the defence committee as saying that in separate presentations in April, the army, navy and the air force had reported that India’s superiority over Pakistan’s military was barely 1:1.2 and India’s superiority had come down from the level of 1:1.7 which it had during the 1971 war.

The committee member, who agreed to talk to the newspaper only after de-escalation of tension between the two countries began, claimed that irrespective of its hard posturing, at no point in time had the government taken any decision to go to war.

“Its sole objective had been to draw the attention of the international community and to mount pressure on Pakistan,” he claimed.

The newspaper said the military headquarters had in fact observed that Pakistan had superior capabilities in several areas, specially in the field of missiles.

“All the major cities in India are within the reach of Pakistan missiles and number of strategic targets as well as number of people likely to be affected are much larger than those in Pakistan,” the unidentified parliament member said.

The military headquarters had also informed the defence standing committee that ever since the troop mobilization began along the Indo-Pakistan border reached its peak, the military was incurring a daily expenditure of Rs600-700 million. Also, since the Dec 13 terrorist strike against the Indian parliament, the total expenditure incurred by the military was a whopping Rs40 billion.

"Standing committee members were also told that given the ground realities, a short surgical strike, either against terrorist camps in (Azad) Kashmir or against strategic targets in Pakistan, was not possible. The war was bound to be a prolonged one unless interrupted by a nuclear strike or heavy international pressure," representatives of the army, navy and air force reportedly said. -JN


Show Forgiveness, speak for Justice and avoid the Ignorant.

[This message has been edited by TARIQ786USA (edited June 15, 2002).]

Interesting analysis... Keep in mind that India is much larger and should have an advantage of 1:3 instead of 1:1.2 as reported by Times of India and this assesment was analyzed not only quantitatively but also qualitatively...

Right. This means that we should continue to build/buy higher quality weapons. The wars of the future wll be decided by technology, lets get the upper hand on that one.


The eyelids of a Rajputs eyes are lowered only in death.

Yet another non-Pak, even an Indian saying Pak Forces are of higher quality and could give Indian forces a severe beating.

Yet, the Indians will continue to believe they have a ‘mighty’ Armed Forces and that this is a US vs Afganistan situation.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/rolleyes.gif

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif

RealDeal you are extactly right. I listened to a USAF General (Ret.) who studied Pak-Indo conflict and he said that the Pakistani Air Force is much better in quality and force than the Indian.. although the Indian might be larger…but we have to remember that is quality not quantity that matters. Also, an expert on the conflict on eitehr CNN or MSNBC said that “he would put his money on Pakistan.”

So–we see–the Indians continue to believe that quantity is better than quality and that technology is better than skill. Consider this: the Pakistani Air Force in all of the wars has won the control over airspace. (I believe there was one incident when PAF fooled the IAF by sending a lot of the bombers to IAF bases, while the Indians tried to claim “air supiriority” when they came bac they had no place to land).

Finally, I would like to say that Pakistan stands for peace. Thats why it was created. Thats why it will remain to exist. That is what India needs to understand - peace. If you are interested in learning about the Pakistani Military visit http://www.pakistanidefence.com .