There is so much bloodshed in the subcontinent thanks to the double speak of India’s politicians and media.
When it comes to Kashmir, they want “bilateral” approach, where only India and Pakistan have to sit and resolve issues. No America, No UN, No China. Just Pakistan and India must resolve the Kashmir issue.
However when it comes to maligning Pakistan (thanks to our Jihadis) India refuses to work bilaterally. ** **They hang on to the coat tails of Americans to say bachao bachao Pakistan bohot bura hai.
This is not how an emerging power acts. It is time Indian politicians learned some statesmanship.
Mutual allies are anyone who wants to destroy America and its' suppoerters. Im sure you can guess who wants to destroy America and its' supporters (Pakistan, UK)?
I am not asking who they are working against, but who they are working for now? Mutual enemies make allies.
Re: India’s two faced approach with Pakistan – bilateral vs. UN
^ I responded to one of the posts in this thread. I agree it's off-topic but did not realise that while responding which thread I was in. You can ask the mods to remove the off-topic posts.
Re: India’s two faced approach with Pakistan – bilateral vs. UN
With regards to your original post, this is a good opportunity for Pakistan to make a strong case based on these two scenarios and india's two-faced approach with the same neighbour and approach UN with this case.
Why is Pakistani leadership sleeping just like the Pakistani media? Is it because of the great president who did not persue the Chenab case and will never be interested to make and persue this case? Pakistan is represented by its' leaders who were 'brought to power' by indian agents' influence on Pak territory. Why would they make and present this case which goes against indian interest?
It is just a case of who is working sincerely for their people. Who has stronger influence on the UN officials, who has better PR, who genuinely and persistantly presents and consistantly persues their cause to the concerned authoritative figures in the international community and those incharge of the world peace. Look for any signs of 'special/better' treatment to the representative of a specific community? If yes, find the causes, then ultimately a solution. Educate your people to be responsible enough to attain those authoritative positions so that a 'balanced' approach is shown by the international peace-making institutions and not biased.
For now, all Pakistan can do is make a strong case, present and persue it persistantly with security council, ask them WHY india is at liberty of getting away with this two-faced approach? DEMAND justice instead of brooding.
With regards to your original post, this is a good opportunity for Pakistan to make a strong case based on these two scenarios and india's two-faced approach with the same neighbour and approach UN with this case.
Why is Pakistani leadership sleeping just like the Pakistani media? Is it because of the great president who did not persue the Chenab case and will never be interested to make and persue this case?** Pakistan is represented by its' leaders who were 'brought to power' by indian agents' influence on Pak territory.** Why would they make and present this case which goes against indian interest?
.
You mean to say that your country men are
1) Foolish enough to accept leaders who were brought to power by Indian agents
2) Not brave enough to stand upto Indian agents.
3) Your countrymen felt that leaders who had the backing of Indian agents were better than patriotic Pakistani leaders.
On a side note, please think before you post. It helps.
Re: India’s two faced approach with Pakistan – bilateral vs. UN
burqaposh, May I please ask who originally agreed from Pakistan's to bilateral solution of Kashmir? And who presently from following the same 'bilateral' approach with india when it comes to kashmir?
However when it comes to maligning Pakistan (thanks to our Jihadis)
you admit it is your own jihadis....so why don't you advise Pakistan to solve its own poison unilaterally. then you won't have to suffer the consequences in the UN or even bilaterally