What has Pak record got to do with the current performance of India? It is not that difficult to beat Aus in Aus as England and recently NZ has proved. India is supposed to be one of the best team around at the moment, so comparing them to Pak is not fair. If Pak loses to England in Dubai should we use the excuse that India lost to England so if Pak lost as well it is fine?
**True other teams have beaten Aus in Aus. For us it looks well nigh impossible - have no good explanation for that!!
****A heavy loss will not be fine in tests since we are playing England in UAE & not in English conditions
**England are a better test team than us at the moment - batting has greater quality and depth + their pace bowling is better, we might have a slight edge in spin department - so I expect them to beat us (narrowly) in tests in UAE. We might win the ODIs
India lost 4-0 in England but I expect India to beat England in a test series in India i.e. England are good but they are not invincible like the dominant Windies or Aussies of the past. Look at what happened to England in India in ODIs right after dominating the same side in English conditions. I do realise that limited overs cricket is a different challenge altogether but still no one was expecting them to lose 5-0 in India (despite missing key players - Sachin and Sehwag)
while Asif post was irrelevant to indian performance,the point that he made remains extremely relevant if viewed in isolation…Pak performance has been pathetic in Aus…simply pathetic…we lost all 3 test matches against them even when we played in relatively friendly conditions in UAE… In contrast India has done much much better against Aussies in last 10 years.
That’s true … but Aussies were nigh invincible then + both Inzi and Yousuf missed that series in 2002, so Pak batting was thin
Even more pathetic was the way we performed (esp. batted) in Aus in 2009/10 because the Aussies were but a pale shadow of the champion team they once were
while Asif post was irrelevant to indian performance,the point that he made remains extremely relevant if viewed in isolation...Pak performance has been pathetic in Aus...simply pathetic...we lost all 3 test matches against them even when we played in relatively friendly conditions in UAE.... In contrast India has done much much better against Aussies in last 10 years.
That might be true but do we need to remind of our performance to justify poor Indian performance. I have yet to see a post where when we perform poorly someone gets up and says its ok India also failed against the same team. Ghamr kee murghi daal baraber.
Thanks GA. Yes, his record in England, SA and NZ is very poor. Impressed by Australia record - even after we remove the highest score of 195, he has a 47 run average.
The high average in Pakistan, Sri Lanka (and possible ~ 60 in Inda?) is really telling.
Thanks GA. Yes, his record in England, SA and NZ is very poor. Impressed by Australia record - even after we remove the highest score of 195, he has a 47 run average.
The high average in Pakistan, Sri Lanka (and possible ~ 60 in Inda?) is really telling.
well i have to agree with you uncle jee that sehwag is more of a flat track master blaster... in 18 tests against NZ, SA and England, his avg. is around 23... i guess his weak technique gets exposed in seaming conditions quite blatantly...
Lack of foot movement is Sehwag's biggest weakness and bowlers exploit it on seaming tracks by bowling a fuller length. But because he relies mainly on excellent hand-eye co-ordination he can still destroy any bowling attack in the world despite the above weakness
Sehwag's record is really excellent against australia. But when he tries to play a subdued innings, he sucks. He is at best when he is playing his strokes.
And I agree that Aus is very beatable these days. India should win at least one of the test matches.
**Hussey worried that Sachin’s 100th ton can happen for sure at SCG
**One of Sachin Tendulkar’s favourite cricket grounds is the Sydney Cricket Ground (SCG). He has excellent record at the SCG, scoring 664 runs in four matches at an average of 221.33. It is seen as the best chance for Sachin to score his elusive 100[SUP]th[/SUP] ton at his favourite ground and after he started the series well and top scoring in both the Indian innings in the first test.Hussey said Tendulkar standing on the threshold of a remarkable milestone is likely to score the hundred at “one of his favourites ground in the world”, making it ominous for the home team ahead of the second Test.“I am a bit nervous because the stars seem to be aligning with Sachin needing one more 100,” Hussey told reporters before the practice session at the SCG Sunday. “The 100th Test match in Sydney – he has made runs here before – it is a little bit ominous but hopefully we can make him wait until after this series and he can get a 100 in the first game of the next series that he plays,” he said.“I can assure you that everyone in our dressing-room does not want him to make a 100. I think our bowlers down in Melbourne did an outstanding job, not just to Sachin but to all of their batsmen,” he added.Cricketing fans across the world are eagerly waiting for Tendulkar’s much awaited hundred. Hussey himself made a remark that it’s not something strange to see Australian fans supporting Sachin.“They have got one of the best batting line-ups ever and the plans that we set and the way they the bowlers executed them were second to none. For a reasonably inexperienced attack to be able to do that job, and for long periods of time which is something we have been really working on, it is a real testament to the bowling group,” Hussey commented on Australia’s bowling attack.“Just from walking across the ground, the pitch looks a lot less green than it has been over the last few years. Certainly, in the last few years, I think the Sydney pitch has changed texture from when it used to be a real dust bowl and helped the spinners. The last few years have been really seamer friendly and there has been overhead conditions to help that as well,” Hussey said on the SCG pitch.
Swhwag again lived dangerously - was droped at slips, one ball did not carry, several misses - and got out for 28. There was never any doubt his wicket woulld fall any time.