It is because there are no new ideas, arguments or propositions in the entire article or your 'my comments' part. All this shows is a Pakistani trying to create some excitement amongst his buddies by rehashing the goings on amongst 3 much bigger countries, taking a a very subjective and superficial view of facts counter to your motivation.
It is not because the article (not your 'my comments' part) does make compelling reading, though not worthy of a debate
And how many of those crimes involving genocide of minorities happen in China?
Plenty. I could open a compendium. But some brief readings, by Chinese authors, about grass roots politics in Tibet and Inner Mongolia, as well as E. Turkestan, will throw some light on the topic.