Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
Your non clinching evidence is just as non-clinching as a presentation as it is word of mouth…
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
patriot , say something new to entertain us. The thing that u r accusing us of is what the world accuses pakistan of.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
Here we go again! ISI's involvment in India is not some altufaltu murder for which an eye witness proof is required or even possible. Circumstantial evidence is sufficient and India has provided enough of it. Han bahijan, if you have decided not to accept any evidence at all because of you closed mind then woh tau baat alag hain.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
^ I guess rest of the world also closed their mind on this issue.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
infact you must be proud of ISI role in India, but that way you will have to accept that your people are involved in killing innocents. i still want to know if you accepted the muslims role in 9/11 because your country is the front runner in standing by americans against talibans, a regime you supported once upon atime.
your self-styled president has changed his stand so often, but still you try to deliver us lessons on democracy.
i like it.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
arabs and muslims probably did 9/11 but those people were stateless entities where ISI is a state entitiy and as such any of actions can cause pakistan harm and as such cannot be responsible for this action and neither has india produced any proof to say otherwise
this is not like Iran using Hezbollah to kill Jews in Argentina in 1992
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
EDIT: original post has been removed.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
It is a ritual: if a bomb explodes anywhere in India, in trains, bus stations, schools or markets, there comes a statement within minutes from responsible officials asserting Pakistan’s involvement in the crime. It is not just a possibility, as one would imagine, it is a certainty. And they have evidence. They even know which particular Pakistani terrorist organization was responsible. They also know to what exact degree the ISI was involved. Then a senior minister — in charge of defense, home or foreign affairs — or even the prime minister himself wades into the fray and issues a somber warning to Musharraf that things cannot go on like this and that his government has to rein in the terrorists and the ISI. Now that Pakistan has called the bluff and elbowed Indian security officials into a corner where they had to either show evidence or shut up, we have the slimy excuse: we have evidence, but it is not clinching. The point here is that Indian officials should know that it is time they grew up. Changing global realities, including the nuclear weapons the two nations possess, have made it impossible for India and Pakistan to continue in the old style. They need to be partners, not enemies. That should mean, in cases of such incidents, keeping mouths shut until there is something to say. And, say it in such a way that it does not sound like an ultimatum. Even if the ISI is involved, Indian officials should have enough political sense to realize that it had to be a rogue operation and resist the temptation to get their two minutes of TV fame by accusing the entire Pakistan government, including president and prime minister.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
it is true that they should have behaved, before accusing should have got clinching evidence.
we are less paranoid than Indians though we fall in the same category, we generally say foreign elements are involved or foreign hand is involved once we want to hide our problems. I wonder India being such a big country is why so much paranoid.
One should look before one speaks, lest one has to put one's foot in the mouth. The debate is not that Intelligence agencies leave no proof, the point is that India announced that it will provide irrefutable evidence to Pakistan. Why are they back tracking now?
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
Guys you should throw such an imbecile Security Advisor out. Either there is evidence or there is not. "Very good, but not clinching" is a very incompetent remark. Think about it.
Re: India admits that Pakistan had no hand in Mumbai Bombings
^ why? Shoaib (or Tendy) can bowl (or bat) very well and still not clinch victory! happens all the time, right?