In Wars

why dont women participate in wars these days… back then there were women warriors too in Hazrat Muhammad SAW armies … I mean this is allowed in our deen just like some other stuff i.e marrying divorced/widowed women etc etc etc … but these days we dont see such a thing WHY? Aren’t man & women are equal ? yeah I know they are equal but they are different too in some terms but “some women” just don’t get the different part in it… anyways … Why dont you women who scream out loud that we are equal to men just go & participate in wars too instead of just sitting on a couch & letting your husband, sons & father die.

More men die as that is the only gender who participates in wars these days hence leaving women behind which results in more population of women than men.

P.S Those who are so into facts & figures should start using google, we all know why there is more population of women than men & this effects the society too…

Re: In Wars

They are in war…

The theater is a bit different…

The battles at the ILS forts

Re: In Wars

in Prophet’s time there were legitimate wars to be fought.. today there is legitimate jihad but women are not “needed” yet there are women fighting in one form or another, you just don’t hear on the mainstream lies.

Re: In Wars

I don’t like it when my nail polish gets chipped.

Re: In Wars

There are a couple of reasons.

Traditionally, it was a matter of strength and stamina - on average men are physically stronger than woman (part of the genetic differences), and women can become as physically strong as men though it takes additional training.

The 2 main reasons today why many countries do not have women in combat roles today are:

  1. The risk of rape and maltreatment if captured
  2. The risk of behavioural changes in male soldiers serving alongside women - the risk that they would go to unprofessional lengths to protect female colleagues, particularly if romantically involved.

On point 2, an often cited study on Israeli soldiers (where women serve in combat roles) found that male soldiers reacted with uncontrollable anger and protectiveness when witnessing female soldiers being shot and wounded, compared to calmer reactions to seeing male soldiers getting shot and wounded.

Re: In Wars

I agree with the OP. Women have just as much of a right to get shot for meaningless wars as men do. Where’s the equality?

Re: In Wars

Why women are not “needed” …. Aren’t women equal to men? They can do everything that man can then why not this too… I mean considering their number I think they should start participating in wars too instead of becoming a couch potato & letting their husbands, sons & fathers die ….. don’t you think they should “support” them & should be standing side by side to them in order to support them?

AFTER ALL THEY ARE EQUAL!

“women fighting in one form or another” :konfused:

You might be referring to the fight that buttsb mentioned?

Yeah I totally get that because while building a career, ladies just sit on a chair & do nail filing while holding a chanel bag in their hand.

Re: In Wars

Re: In Wars

Define meaningless & meaningful wars? So you are saying that men are useless creatures & should go ahead & waste their lives in which you think as “meaningless wars” …. What is meaningless to you might be meaningful to other person.

Why don’t women participate in wars too… I mean considering their number they should … This whole time men are defending the borders all by themselves ( reason why they are found less in number than women) why not women join them too? what is wrong in it after all they are equal….

Re: In Wars

^ yes that’s right, but it’s more Kate Spade for daily carriers. Chanel for networking events.

Re: In Wars

That’s cool :k:

:gina:

Re: In Wars

^ over the head and out beyond. you have my attention, unknownnn.

Re: In Wars

I can say that because women won’t have as much testosterone as men. Without additional training, their muscle mass fails to develop as fully as men’s muscles do. This makes then naturally weaker than men, unless they do physical training. But with the same amount of training, a man will be even stronger…

Female rape is statistically much more likely, given that the majority of men are heterosexual.

I can say that because it is proven by psychological observation

In office scenarios, there is very little chance of women getting harmed.

During the time of Hazrat Mohammad (pbuh), women only participated in combat roles in wars under dire circumstances when the alternative would have been defeat. Other than that, they would deal with the injured, and bring water and supplies up to the men who were actually fighting.

The lesson that we can take from the role of women during his time is that it is perfectly acceptable for them to be in the army, preferably in medical and support roles because that is the purpose for which they accompanied armies in his time, yet when militarised they need to be trained to fight as well as men so that they can do so if needed.

Re: In Wars

Sooooooooo, who are we talking about here?
Pakistani or American women?
'Cause if it’s Pakistani, y’all should not even be asking this question…

Re: In Wars

Women are at front lines of battle field.

Go visit life and relationship forum, most of the thread revolve around tyrant general saas and her wicked vice colonel nannd always trying to mess up with junior officer and massom bahu.

Re: In Wars

This is trueeeeee…women and men should both go and get blown up…that way NO one will be around to hold down the families.

Re: In Wars

.
hmmm interesting topic
I want ppl come with more :wink:

Re: In Wars

OP, are you participating in war?

Re: In Wars

True

Re: In Wars

Considering the increasing population of women, why not? they want equal rights & then they hestitae to participate in wars too, WHY? women can fight in the war fields while man stay at home & take care of their children, i mean after all they are their children too & AREN’T MEN & WOMEN EQUAL?

would you give your seat in a bus to a guy if he is standing? i haven’t seen any woman doing that but i have seen a lot of men giving up their seats for women…WHY? don’t you think we should treat everyone with respect despite of gender… women should be courteous to men too, why men have to do this always…AFTER ALL MEN & WOMEN ARE EQUAL …

when titanic ship sank, they saved women & children first, WHY? … I get that they rescued children first because they are our future, vulnerable, cant protect themselves etc etc but WHY save women, why not men & children first ( after all they are equal)? i mean women can rescue men too :chai: as we all know women want equal rights, they can do everything that men can then why not this? annnddd by the way women “can” protect & take care of themslves, dont they?

kya yeh khula tazaad nahi :frowning: