In Pakistan, Criticism of President is Good for TV Ratings‎

I have stopped watching Pakistani news channels. They lack credibility & most of them it seem cheer for Taliban against govt. I think only professional news channel is dawnnews.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704122904575314920080014664.html

In Pakistan, Criticism of the President Is Good News for TV Ratings

By TOM WRIGHT

Massimo Berruti/Agence Vu for The Wall Street Journal
A reporter covers a suicide attack near Islamabad. Pakistan has nearly 100 satellite and cable channels.

KARACHI, Pakistan—TV executives here, supported by a boom in advertising revenue and feeding off a public taste for conspiracy theories, are using popular news channels to chip away at the standing of Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari.

News anchors often use populist, antigovernment and anti-U.S. rhetoric in a bid to raise their viewership. Talk-show hosts regularly repeat rumors that Washington and India are acting secretly to take over Pakistan and are fighting Islam.

Among the most notorious is Zaid Hamid, a host and pundit who regularly invokes conspiracy theories about plots against Pakistan by U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies, and has called for an invasion of India.

Last year, a number of channels, as well as some newspapers, published pictures of houses they claimed were rented by Central Intelligence Agency spies, prompting a rebuke from the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan.

Anchors at Geo Television, the country’s largest broadcaster by ad revenue and viewership, regularly attack Mr. Zardari’s government—a U.S. ally prosecuting a war against the Pakistan Taliban.

Almost nightly, Geo’s talk show hosts call for Mr. Zardari’s ouster on corruption charges and urge him to flee the country. They claim Mr. Zardari, a democratically elected leader, is a stooge of the U.S. for allowing CIA drone strikes against the Taliban leadership.

The Zardari administration declined to comment on Geo. A spokesman for Mr. Zardari said television news media in general is discrediting itself by engaging in partisan behavior.

“They gossip and take hearsay from the streets onto the TV screens,” says Owais Tohid, a journalist and former director of English-language news at Geo, which has a 24-hour news channel and three other channels. “I know how desperate they become when owners ask them to improve their ratings.”

Pakistan’s television industry is doing well despite the nation’s shaky economic picture. Foreign investment is in the doldrums and Pakistan is reliant on International Monetary Fund loans due to a weak government fiscal position. But sectors of the economy that sell consumer goods to the nation’s growing middle class have expanded in recent years, and TV is benefiting.

Annual TV ad sales jumped 20% last year to $174 million, after rising 13% in 2008.

There are almost 100 satellite and cable channels in Pakistan today, some in English but most in the local Urdu language, covering news, entertainment, fashion and sports and reaching a third of the country’s 175 million people. Scores of TV channels have been created in recent years, boosting free speech and spurring social debate.

Until a decade ago, Pakistani television consisted of only the state-owned Pakistan Television Network, which broadcast dreary reports on visiting dignitaries. But then-President Pervez Musharraf deregulated the industry, spawning scores of new channels.

New channels have shined a light on social and political subjects that were previously taboo, such as police brutality and forced marriages, said Mohammad Waseem, a professor of political sciences at the Lahore University of Management Sciences. “Television brought up things in society that were never brought up before,” he said.

Imran Aslam, president of Karachi-based International Media Corp., which owns Geo Television and the Jang Group of newspapers, defends going after Mr. Zardari for alleged corruption. Mr. Zardari, the husband of late former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, has spent seven years in jail in Pakistan since the late 1990s on alleged graft charges, but was never formally convicted. “You have to hold these people accountable. The opposition’s not doing it,” Mr. Aslam said.

Geo also had run-ins with Mr. Zardari’s predecessor, Mr. Musharraf. The station and others aired protests by lawyers that led to Mr. Musharraf’s resignation in 2008, but before he stepped down he temporarily pulled TV channels, including Geo, off the air.

Mr. Aslam acknowledges some anchors go too far. He says that those who take extreme Islamist or nationalist stances have seen their ratings drop; but those with antigovernment slants are popular. “We’re still learning,” Mr. Aslam says. “We need to look at ourselves. Responsibility of the media is a huge thing.”

President Zardari’s approval ratings have dropped sharply amid perceptions of his closeness to the U.S., which is unpopular among many Pakistanis.

In a poll published in August, the Washington-based Pew Research Center found 32% of those asked had a favorable view of Mr. Zardari, down from 64% in 2008. Meanwhile, 77% said the growing news media was having a positive effect on the country.

Mr. Zardari is also facing a challenge to his authority from the nation’s Supreme Court. Earlier this year, the nation’s top judge ordered corruption cases involving Mr. Zardari to be reopened following an earlier amnesty. Geo TV is among the most vociferous supporters of the Supreme Court’s push to reopen the cases.

But the channel is facing some of its own bad publicity, too. Geo has faced heightened scrutiny after a popular host, Hamid Mir, was allegedly caught on tape last month talking secretly to an Islamist militant wanted on terrorism charges.

Mr. Mir has said the tapes are fraudulent and were made by intelligence agents who are out to get him. Mr. Mir didn’t respond to requests for an interview.

Mr. Aslam says it is in fact Mr. Mir on the tape and that the channel is conducting an internal inquiry into who the other man is on the line. Meanwhile, Mr. Mir—who is known in Pakistan as the first person to interview Osama bin Laden after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, is still on the air.

Even some anchors with reputations as conspiracy theorists say they have become uncomfortable with the political role television is playing in the war against the government. “We are not players, we are umpires,” says Aamir Liaquat Husain, who anchors a controversial religious talk show on Geo. “We should act like a neutral person.”

Write to Tom Wright at [email protected]

The day Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are similarly criticized by the WSJ for feeding off paranoia and conspiracy theories to the American public is the day I'll gladly accept the journalist's opinion.

I completely agree with you. The only purpose of these talk shows hosts seems to be to dis the government, especially the president. It is obviously ok to criticize the government, but these hosts clearly work on certain agenda.
On the other hand, these people hardly ever criticize Taliban and their affiliates. They never have any appreciation for the work government does to control extremism in country. Nor do these hosts focus on any other political party in Pakistan.

and where else in the world would you find a president like this...

I don't know which channels you guys are referring to, but I've seen Pakistani channels report on recovery in Swat and what govt and military have achieved. We already have PTV doing the kiss-a$$ job, so why does every channel need to be licking the govt feet?

Why only president? What about others? iss hammam mein sub nungay hein.

But your one-sided remark shows why criticism of Pak would be good for TV ratings. This is why TV anchors love to do it.

Well, they don't criticize president 24/7. Of course other things go on.
There is no need to be licking feet. They should at least be fair. Just watch Kamran Khan show, for example. The guy is always talking about "hukoomat ki SARM-NAAK shikast", and "court sadr ko kub TALAB kare gi?"
Just look at the choice of words.

Re: In Pakistan, Criticism of President is Good for TV Ratings‎

I’m glad the govt is finally moving to clampdown on run away electronic media.

Legislation on restricting media on the cards

Thursday, July 01, 2010

Monitoring Desk

RAWALPINDI: The government is poised to clamp down on the country’s independent media industry.

The government has introduced a bill in parliament which, if passed, would usher in harsher regulations for broadcasters and online organisations, the BBC reported on Wednesday. The bill seeks to amend a law enforced by former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf, in a bid to regulate parts of the media.

Political analysts fear the government is using the law to rein in broadcasters critical of its policies, the report said. The bill, which targets radio and TV and some online news services, is likely to be voted on within days.

The extent to which new media will be affected by the proposed law is unclear, while print remains unaffected. The current government, led by the Pakistan People’s Party, has sought to placate censorship fears by claiming that it is diluting the harsher methods introduced by the former dictator.

“We are introducing the bill after disposing of those parts introduced by Musharraf,” Belum Hasnain, chairwoman of the parliament’s media committee said in a statement. The committee has to vet the bill, known as the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Act, before the Parliament votes on it.

Belum Hasnain said the bill would remove restrictions on the media, as promised by Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani in his inaugural speech. However, political analysts believe that the government is using the law to rein in local television channels which have grown highly critical of its policies, the report said.

According to the bill, broadcasters in Pakistan will be banned from showing images or programming of suicide bombings, terrorists or the bodies of victims of terror attacks. They will also be prevented from showing related material.

Further, they will not be permitted to broadcast statements by militants or extremists, or activities deemed to be connected with the spread of militancy and extremism. The broadcaster will also be bound to assure the government that none of its programmes will promote hatred or militancy.

In addition, the law states that programmes opposing the ideology, sanctity, independence and security of the state of Pakistan cannot be broadcast. Companies that violate the law will have their licences cancelled. They can also be fined up to 10 million rupees and jailed for three years.

The bill is likely to raise questions about the government’s policy on freedom of speech and dissent, which has hardened considerably over the past three months. The electronic media regulatory bill is likely to be presented for vote before the Parliament in a few days.

Reuters/AFP add from Islamabad: If approved, the bill would also prevent discussions which could “influence” the judiciary at a time when it has been dealing with several political cases involving President Asif Ali Zardari.

Officials accuse some media outlets critical of the president of running a vilification campaign against the government, but promised they would not curb free speech. “The government does not believe in politics of victimisation … the government believes in freedom of expression,” Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira said. “However, the media is needed to exercise freedom with responsibility,” he added.

Rights activists, however, doubt the government’s intentions. “This bill is a self-defeating exercise. They are harming their own image and it exposes their dictatorial temperament,” said Iqbal Haider, a former law minister and co-chairman of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan.

“To call a spade a spade, or a crook a crook is no offence,” he observed.Presidential spokeswoman Farahnaz Ispahani said the code of conduct introduced by the Parliamentary Committee on Information and Broadcasting was not an attempt to control the independent electronic media, and would be similar to one “practised all over the world.”

Ispahani, who is also a member of the parliamentary committee, said the new rules had been listed in a report by the committee that would become a bill in parliament’s next session, in August.

She defended the proposed new restrictions, saying that nowhere in the civilised world are murderers, terrorists and extremists given air time on the electronic media to expound their views.

“The Pakistani nation, our government and our military are fighting and facing death at the hands of these anti-state actors every day. Thousands of innocent Pakistanis have already died in this war,” she said, adding: “Showing dead, mutilated corpses and other extreme pictures and videos give psychological strength to the extremists and cause emotional grief to the people of Pakistan.”

did u read the thread title?
my remarks were for president cos thread was abt him..and i live in pakistan..and i know the hammam and all naungas ..