In defense of and against an injust system

If the prices of commodities kept rising, yet the salaries remained the same or shrank, what would you do and who would you hold responsible?
If the politicians made the same broken promises that you heard your elders speaking of in a hopeless tone, which politicians will you trust?
If the electricity was unavailable 18 out of 24 hours, yet you were billed for 24 hours and/or more to bear the burden of electricity thieves, what will you do and who will you blame?

Why are we so quick to compare Pakistan to other nations when it aligns with our own views, yet discard that same comparison when it contradicts our views? A lot of the developed nations of today went through a phase of struggle where people fought for their rights on the streets, and were labeled as trouble-makers, peace disturbers, and violators of the law of the land. They were beaten, killed, lynched, burned, and if they were lucky they were jailed. But, if no one raised a voice and made an organized effort to force a positive change, where will those developed nations be today?

Civil disobedience doesn’t have to have a stigma, unless it’s just a small group agitating against the public at-large. But what do you say when a large segment of your public adopts the method of street power as a way to have themselves heard? Why are the history books filled with romanticized stories of such movements, yet every current ruling government shuns such talk?

I’ll tell you that If I was billed for services that I was never provided, I would not pay that bill and would dispute it. Why aren’t the wealthy public officials and industrialists expected to bear the burden of electricity thieves, and commodity smugglers/hoarders, yet the poorest of the poor are expected to keep writing checks with their sweat and blood in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? That is complete injustice, and anyone who stands against such a vile system of governance will gain support from within the same people who supported the system before the system victimized them as well.

How many a times even in recent history have we seen that politicians who wouldn’t be seen sharing the same street with their opponents come together at the same dining table because their interests are at risk? It’s a horrendous practice, and anyone who doesn’t find fault in it is guilty of the suffering of the people who have been victims of the system of injustice where rich prosper and poor continue to suffer. Where the rulers have decorative lights even for their gardens in the dead of night, yet the students burn midnight oil and candles for the lack of electricity just so that they can achieve better things in life because they still believe in a Pakistan that values education.

We all need an honest assessment of ourselves, and our loyalties. When our loyalties to the uberly wealthy families take root in our heart, and we start to fight our own countrymen on their behalf, then know that we have deviated from the path of truth and justice.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

Lets be honest to ourselves 1st,

I hate all this injustice around me no body can support it, from petty to important things, everything seems to be in control of certain mafias. need to get rid of all these by bringing someone who can actually start the cleaning work. But is there anyone who is ready to clean, let us not get into what a particular party or politician is saying or what an army rule can get.

Now i am not asking for all out revolution because history tells that no revolution had brought any good to any society or country as it is mere replacement of elite/ruling class. I am asking a gradual evolution with backed by solid foundation which can be deliver us such society, am i dreaming? No, there are examples, England is there, China is there, specially China who after a failed revolution, decided to get out of that mode and start developing the nation, they are not their yet but we can see that they are almost there, Turkey is another example, they are on the right path, they have achieved economic success and it is only matter of time when social justice would be there for everyone.

I want the same evolution for my country, i for once denounce any violence or abuses or polarization in my country, the corrupt culture in a country like Pakistan cannot be wiped by a revolution but only a gradual cleansing from bottom to top. Any party be it political or army, they cannot do it alone, as a matter of fact they can't do it at all. It is people's decision then adopted by the political parties..

Specially in our society, we want everything for free and without struggle and quick, we take things we have for granted and we study not to become a civilized person or a knowledgeable person but to win a Job, and degree for us is just a PASS to get a job, that is the reason we are among the nations who have lowest ratio of graduates in Mathematics and other sciences, and we may have highest in degrees in accounts or something which can get us jobs. With this attitude no matter how high level degree we may have, it is never going to put a leash on the animal inside us.

Anyone thinking that a particular political party can be reason of their rise or fall then they mistaken, it takes more than that to have a rise and respect in the global arena, to start with, start respecting yourself first.

Last but not least, blaming system, or calling it a rotten one and asking for new one is mere political slogan, our system can only deliver if we want it to deliver, there are certain changes which may be needed but it should be gradual and with the time.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

What is this rhetoric of 'gradual change'. I see the word get tossed around every time people genuinely raise a point about injustice and corruption of the status quo? What does the word even mean? What can't this illusive 'gradual change' start taking place from today? Does the rhetoric of gradual change mean, like always, we must waste another generation, go through another cycle of indifference and inaction, and somehow hope that time, mere time alone will magically fix everything on its own?

If that's the case, I don't think couple of decades ago people would've dared thought that in the age of free media, supposedly independent judiciary an a historic anti status quo protest, criminals like Zardari and Sharif family would still manage to get their cases buried in the NAB. But it happened. Would anyone like tell that in the name of gradual change how many more decades of looting and plundering it would take before someone decides to punish criminal mafia like Sharifs and Zardaris. There is a reason why this deception of 'gradual change' is has been dismissed by the masses. Sure they don't want a bloody revolution, but they also know they don't want a system where criminals like Sharif and Zardari openly loot, abuse power and buy people, yet have no one to challenge them.

All fearmongering aside, honestly, the sky won't fall on Pakistan and the earth won't rip open to swallow the poor country if the likes of Sharif and Zardaris are punished for their crimes against the nation. I don't know why some people think like that. But I'm glad the educated masses in Pakistan has punched above this pathetic fearmongering and passivity, and they are demanding their rights. There is absolutely no reason why system cannot fixed now. There is so much to democracy there holding periodic rigged elections, and just because we have the right to change the government after five years, under no circumstances people should assume those five years mean that criminals like Zardari and Nawaz Sharif have the license to inflict as much damage as possible.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

It means, "we (the status quo leaders) looted the country for 30 years....you have to give our kids at least 15...and their kids 5. System ko chalnay do.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

The calls we heard was to 'save' the system, not improve it.

I would agree with you that gradual change is much better for Pakistan but if there are no efforts for even tiny changes, we will get nowhere. Right now, if you are rich and powerful, you can get away with anything and there is absolutely no desire from anyone to 'change' this since those in charge of such changes are themselves rich and powerful.

Eventually, people would get fed up. Ask @S@leem bhai for details.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

you can call it whatever you want, because what you are preaching is going to deliver nothing but death in masses, rapes, orphans and handicaps... i have seen people believing in overnight change and i have then seen them bearing the fruit when their wives, daughters sell themselves to have a meal of one time in Jordan and Egypt. The Syrian refugees regret that moment when they were out in masses demanding an overnight change and they got the change but not what they were looking for, the ones who promised paradise on earth and leading lavish lives in Europe leaving people to suffer.

The all bookish bullshyt can be sold but the real price is paid by the people, evolution is only way forward and this will not come by dharnay or jalsay or by anyother things, it will come by working it out... i wish if you can all visit Jordan and see the camps of syrians who were once on the roads demanding change... i cannot bear to see my people are having 10th of what these guys are suffering from... and that in the name of change.

and no please not S@leem bhai and speically details... they are toooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo lonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

you can check the library of the UK where you live... this rhetoric worked their well enough !!!!

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

I am not preaching anything. I am just saying that those in power should also wake up and rectify things because this revolution bullshyt is becoming easier to sell with every stupidity that they indulge in.

Again, I agree with you that gradual change is the way forward, but I don’t see even that happening. For me, ‘change’ would only start when ONE of the rich and powerful is made to pay for his/her deeds. Is it really too much of a change to ask? Only ONE?

It is not 80s or 90s anymore. People are exposed to world beyond their villages and things would only get worse. Why create situations where people eventually get fed up?

Sometimes, people get suffocated, even in the wealthiest of places.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

Buoyant consumer market - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

Consumer confidence in Pakistan remains high.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

lol! No, the rhetoric didn't. The actions did. The ability to respond to people's grievances as you go along.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

[RIGHT]یوں تو حکمران جماعت کو اس کے اقرباپروری پر مبنی اندازِ حکمرانی کو نشانہ بنایا ہی جارہا ہے، اس کے باوجود وزیراعظم نے قومی امور پر اپنے مشیر کے چھوٹے بھائی کو طویل فاصلےپر تعلیم دینے والی ملک کی معروف یونیورسٹی کا سربراہ بنادیا ہے۔

صدر ممنون حسین نے وزیراعظم کےمشور پر جمعرات کے روز عرفان صدیقی کے چھوٹے بھائی پروفیسر ڈاکٹر شاہد صدیقی کو علامہ اقبال اوپن یونیورسٹی کا وائس چانسلر مقرر کیا۔

اس کے علاوہ صدر مملکت نے پروفیسر جاوید اشرف کو قائداعظم یونیورسٹی کا وائس چانسلر اور پروفیسر ڈاکٹر معصوم یاسین زئی کو بین الاقوامی اسلامک یونیورسٹی اسلام آباد کا ریکٹر مقرر کیا۔

ڈان سے بات کرتے ہوئے عرفان صدیقی نے کہا کہ ان کے بھائی کا انتخاب خالصتاً قابلیت کی بنیاد پر ہوا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا ’’وہ ایک قابل شخصیت ہیں، اور ان کا انتخاب میرٹ پر ہوا ہے، انہیں اس لیے منتخب نہیں کیا گیا ہے کہ وہ میرے بھائی ہیں۔‘‘

وزیراعظم نے نو افراد کی ایک فہرست (ہر عہدے کے لیے تین) میں سے ان تین ماہرِ تعلیم کا انتخاب کیا تھا، یہ فہرست انہیں وزیرِ تعلیم محمد بلیغ الرحمان کی سربراہی میں قائم ایک کمیٹی کی جانب سے ارسال کی گئی تھی۔[/RIGHT]
??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? - URDU.DAWN.COM](http://urdu.dawn.com/news/1010435)

Nawaz Sharif is at its old game of bribing and nepotism. This man will never learn. It had been 7 months since his own MNAs met him in September. Some even waited for 12 months.
He thinks he is Royal or something, moves between PM house, Maree and Raiwind, but don’t have time for his own party and parliament.

Re: In defense of and against an injust system

This is why, Imran me laakh buraiyaa sahi, uski baat sub ke dil ko lagti hai.