Re: Imran Khan taken to cleaners by the YOUTH
Prophet Mohammed (Peace Be Upon Him) was joined by people who were pillar of the status quo then. They were "sajaada nasheen" of their own. But once they identified the truth, their lives were changed altogether.
When he quote such example, is referring to this notion that PTI is the only right path? yes or no will do here.
The reason for this question is, Islam negated all the religion on the planet and offered its own teaching and theories and practices, according to Islam, everything else was rejected or out-dated, anyone entering Islam was entering it for good and on top of everything, the personal and social character of Prophet Mohammad (SAAW) was undisputed among the enemies and friends and the muslims of that era were trained by none other but the Prophet Himself, who was the best teacher and leader of all time and yet it took him 20+ years. So IK gives example of that era, is he saying that all other parties and politicians in Pakistan are corrupt unless they join him and he is the finest leader available?
If anyone has the capacity and ability to outclass Imran, than let it be. Performer should prevail. But every aspirant must know that they need the charisma, charater and acceptability among the masses to dethrone Imran.
You are missing the point here completely, to masses who are attracted to PTI, the Manifesto or the message of PTI means nothing or very little to them, the main reason is the personality of IK... if IK is removed from the picture then there is same politicians who have history of changing loyalties through out their career... unless you are saying that everyone who joins PTI gets some special treatment and they posses certain part of IK personality then that is something else...
Had the Zardari gang been dislodged at that time, Pakistan might have not seen as many bad days as it had to. It was about mitigating the misery. Having said that, I am personally in favour of letting the gang continue for its stipulated time.
The political amateurish behaviour have led to this conclusion... in March 2009, it was only one year since Zardari govt had sworn in, had they been thrown out back then, they had become siyasi shaheed, and apart from this, the issue of removing govt the moment it comes into power have damaged alot in nineties, i am glad that NS have learned its lesson from that period and have behaved with maturity. We should now grow up and have our things done on issue to issue basis, not on every issue we ask or have long march to bring the govt down... that would be the most pathetic habit or thing to be done.
What NS did that time was the right thing, the long march was NOT there for bringing the govt down... there was no hint for that... the long march was there to restore judges Period... nothing more, nothing less...
This is politics. We can still afford to allow some political slogans to Imran also. After all we allowed "roti, kaprra aur makaan" and "Asian Tiger" slogans also in the past.
And lastly, Imran is not an angel. He is a mere mortal. At least give him a chance if you don't have alternatives. In Mushahid's Hussein's words, "let's make new mistakes instead of repeating the old ones."
On side, IK is giving example of Prophet (SAAW) and on other you are saying it is just politics... what do you mean by that? can you eleborate further? what politics mean? that you come up with false slogans? you mean to say that his call for corruption is false one or one of his calls or slogan is mere lie???
The whole point is, IK is seeding a vicious crop, feeding it with frustration and anger, pampering it with hatred and very high hopes... which if he fails to deliver then will create more mess then we have at hand. If he is not to build such high hopes, if he has to act as any other politician in the country then his replies above are perfectly fine but calling him self leader of change and revolution and then coming up with lame argument as above... says that he is playing with the fire, the fire which will do more damage then the fire of Bhutto did...
Last not least, Zafar Waraich is Not Khalid bin Waleed (RZA) and IK is no way a messenger so it would be good if he stop comparing..
