We have all been to those meetings where someone
wants
“more than 100%.”
Well here’s how you do that. Here’s how you can
achieve
103%. First of all, here’s a little math that
might prove helpful in the future. How does one
achieve
100% in LIFE? Begin by noting the following.IF :
A = 1
B = 2
C = 3
D = 4
E = 5
F = 6
G = 7
H = 8
I = 9
J = 10
K = 11
L = 12
M = 13
N = 14
O = 15
P = 16
Q = 17
R = 18
S = 19
T = 20
U = 21
V = 22
W = 23
X = 24
Y = 25
Z = 26Then:
H A R D W O R K =
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = Only 98%Similarly,
K N O W L E D G E =
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = Only 96%But interesting (and as you’d expect),
A T T I T U D E =
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%… This is how you
achieve 100% in LIFE.But EVEN MORE IMPORTANT TO NOTE (or REALIZE), is
B U L L S H I T =
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%So now you kno! w what all those high-priced
consultants, upper management, and motivational
speakers really mean when they want to exceed 100%!
Nice....
We have all been to those meetings where someone wants
“more than 100%.” Well here’s how you do that. Here’s how you can achieve 103%. First of all, here’s a little math that might prove helpful in the future. How does one achieve 100% in LIFE? Begin by noting the following.
IF :
A = 1
B = 2
C = 3
D = 4
E = 5
F = 6
G = 7
H = 8
I = 9
J = 10
K = 11
L = 12
M = 13
N = 14
O = 15
P = 16
Q = 17
R = 18
S = 19
T = 20
U = 21
V = 22
W = 23
X = 24
Y = 25
Z = 26
Then:
H A R D W O R K =
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = Only 98%
Similarly,
K N O W L E D G E =
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = Only 96%
But interesting (and as you'd expect),
A T T I T U D E =
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%..... This is how you
achieve 100% in LIFE.
But EVEN MORE IMPORTANT TO NOTE (or REALIZE), is
B U L L S H I T =
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%
So now you kno! w what all those high-priced
consultants, upper management, and motivational
speakers really mean when they want to exceed 100%!
now its really nice :k: thanxx
assigning numbers to letters and then using numbers as percentages to refer to certain human attributes doesn make sense . Morever, even if we were to consider the numbering of letter system to be a good measure of the effort required then we would be led to different percentages depending on which languge we use.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Gamma Dilation: *
assigning numbers to letters and then using numbers as percentages to refer to certain human attributes doesn make sense . Morever, even if we were to consider the numbering of letter system to be a good measure of the effort required then we would be led to different percentages depending on which languge we use.
[/QUOTE]
I think that this forum is for jokes.
Isn't it.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Lahori Tiger: *
I think that this forum is for jokes.
Isn't it.
[/QUOTE]
So what do you think it was? Research on quantum computing or what?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sharjeel: *
So what do you think it was? Research on quantum computing or what?
[/QUOTE]
i thimk u should be telling this to Gamma.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Gamma Dilation: *
assigning numbers to letters and then using numbers as percentages to refer to certain human attributes doesn make sense . Morever, even if we were to consider the numbering of letter system to be a good measure of the effort required then we would be led to different percentages depending on which languge we use.
[/QUOTE]
I think that Gamma, at this point, just laugh, man, laugh. Many things don't make sense but at those times, all you can do is laugh.
Great Joke, btw! :D
aray yaar… aap loag tou larnay lagay ho 
:D
nice one:k:
keep up the good work:)