Peace Seyyed Naqvi
There really is no difference in the two hadith types:
Qur'an and Sunnah or Qur'an and Al-Bayt are and can be consdiered synonymous. Such that in order to preserve the Qur'an and Sunnah the Bayt were there to continue the legacy of Muhammad (SAW).
Al-Bayt were the experts on the mannerisms, the personal affairs and dealings of Muhammad (SAW) to preserve and respect them meant the preservation and respect for their knowledge of him (SAW).
As Muslims were preserve and respect and guard all three Qur'an, Ahl-al-Bayt and as a result the Sunnah.
Thank you, for the seemingly balanced explanation.
I agree with you, but I still think there is bias in your 'underquote' of the hadith pertaining to Qur'an and 'Sunnah' as it seems to disguise the reality according to the more stronger and numerous hadith quotes on the version 'Qur'an and my Ahlul Bayt'. It is better to be specific here; there are so many Sunnis for example, I have spoken with, who keep coming up with the same hadith quote as a view to defend that being 'Sunni' as it were is justified through the weaker tradition.
One wonders furthermore at the attitude of certain Sahabah who had without doubt knowledge of the status of The Prophet Mohammed's family, and still opposed them by mobilising their armies to wage war, embroiling 'other' Sahabah at the same time, to fight the armies supporting Imam Ali.
I spoke to a Sunni Seyyed recently, within the shrine of Seyyedah Zainab in Syria, who attempted to avoid conversation on this matter, believing that it would cause 'fitna', whilst admitting that Mu'awiah was a 'shrewed' politician, and that he thought that what he did was 'wrong', and it is a 'very difficult pill to swallow', but 'we shouldn't criticise The Sahabah' .
Well, if it was haram to criticise, then why was it not haraam to kill, according to Mu'awiah? Criticism, in it's constructive sense is the very thing that helps us to understand each other, and in turn avoid potential bloodshed. This 'type' of criticism is what the father of Yazid himself was unable to accept and he instead preferred to wage war, merely to hold on to the reign of governance, which was his ultimate aim.
In letter no 10 in Nahjul Balagha, Imam Ali speaks to him
"O, Mu'awiah...You think you have come out seeking to avenge Uthman's blood. Certainly, you know how Uthman's blood was shed. If you want to avenge it, avenge it there"
I invite you to express your views, as I would be interested in knowing what you think, in view of the difference amongst 'The Ahle Sunnah', on the opinion of Yazid and his forefathers. Please respond to my blog (no one's commented on it yet!) 'Imam Ali's letter to Yazid's dad', on this site, if you may.
Wassalaam.