Imaan-e-Abu Talib By A Sunni Scholar

[quote]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
the word used there is not ab but the plural form aabaa which is commonyl used in urdu as well as "aabaa-o-ajdaad" which means ancestors....the word "ab" means just "father" and nothing else....
[/quote]
The following is the Ayat (Verse) you are talking about.

Nay ! were you witnesses when death visited Yaqoub, when he said to his sons : What will you serve after me ? They said : Well will serve your God and the God of your fathers, Ibrahim and Ismail and Ishaq, one God only, and to Him do we submit. 2 : 133 ]

It is used in plural because in this Ayat there are more than one (or two) people mentioned as non-biological fathers. So the point you are giving is illogical. aabbaa (plural) means more than one father or uncle(like father, grandfather, great grandfather and uncles); therefore ab means one father or step father, or father in law or uncle. Same as we use the word abu for both biological father as well as non-biological father. like Abu Talib, Abu Turab, Abu Al Kalam Azad, Abu Al Aallah Moududi etc.

The source of "Ajdaad" is "Jad" means Biological - Grand fathers or Biological - Great grand fathers. Same as Jad -e- Amjad, Jad-e-Aalaah etc. Using Ajdaad in conjunction with Aabaa also clarifies the meanings of Aabaa, which is non-biological fathers, biological fathers, uncle, grand father and great fathers.

But on the other hand the word Walid (singular) is only used for biological father and if you make plural of it, it would include father and mother. this word will always be used if you want to mention the real father of a person like we use in urdu as well Khalid wald Muhammad wald Fazal ...etc

The Arabic word for child "Walad (pl: Awlad)" does not need a dictionary to define, since it is a self-defining word. In Arabic "walada" means to "give birth" and "walad" means "the one who is born."

Similarly Allah used LAM YALID WA-LAM YOLAD

[Shakir 112:3] He begets not, nor is He begotten.

[Yusufali 112:3] He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;

[Pickthal 112:3] He begetteth not nor was begotten.

Similarly Wald-uzana, wald-ul-haram are all in Biological sense. etc

It is a historical fact that in the days of Ibrahim the patriarch of the family was addressed as father. The Christians address their priests as father, and in the same sense they refer to God as the father in heaven. Many traditions say that the real father of Ibrahim died before his birth and he was brought up by Azar, his uncle, who was the patriarch of his family. It is also said that Azar, his uncle, married his mother after his father's death, therefore Azar was also his step-father.

Teacher is your father, priest of your father in the sense of ab. but not in the sense of "Walid"

To disprove you must have to bring the other meaning of the Ayat in which Prophet Ibrahim prayed for his parents (Walidayn not Ab or aabaa). along with a prove that the word Ab is used only for Father; for no one else. as it is used for Uncle in Ayat. [2:133]

If there is no proof - we will can consider the parents (Walidayn) of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) and Prophet Ibrahim(AS) were on right path; they were Muslims; deen e Hanif

[quote]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
and Quran mentions that after a time (instructed by Allah) he stopped making istighfaar for his father.... i am sure u know the verse i am talking about....
[/quote]
The following is the verse you are talking about.

[Shakir 9:113] It is not (fit) for the Prophet and those who believe that they should ask forgiveness for the polytheists, even though they should be near relatives, after it has become clear to them that they are inmates of the flaming fire.

[Yusufali 9:113] It is not fitting, for the Prophet and those who believe, that they should pray for forgiveness for Pagans, even though they be of kin, after it is clear to them that they are companions of the Fire.

[Pickthal 9:113] It is not for the Prophet, and those who believe, to pray for the forgiveness of idolaters even though they may be near of kin (to them) after it hath become clear that they are people of hell-fire.

This verse was revealed in 9 Hijra

Read the very next Ayat(Verse)

[Shakir 9:114] And Ibrahim asking forgiveness for his sire was only owing to a promise which he had made to him; but when it became clear to him that he was an enemy of Allah, he declared himself to be clear of him; most surely Ibrahim was very tender-hearted forbearing.

[Yusufali 9:114] And Abraham prayed for his father's forgiveness only because of a promise he had made to him. But when it became clear to him that he was an enemy to Allah, he dissociated himself from him: for Abraham was most tender-hearted, forbearing.
[Pickthal 9:114] The prayer of Abraham for the forgiveness of his father was only because of a promise he had promised him, but when it had become clear unto him that he (his father) was an enemy to Allah he (Abraham) disowned him. Lo! Abraham was soft of heart, long-suffering.

Ibrahim prayed for his father (Ab) because of his promise with him. Allah Stopped with him because it became clear unto Ibrahim that his father (Ab : Azar) was an enemy of Allah.

Ibrahim(AS) real father (Walid) was Tarakh. He died when Ibrahim(AS) was very young. Ibrahim(AS) never stopped praying for him even he was very old. [14:41] Even when Allah gave him two sons[14:39] he (AS) prayed for his (Walidayn). [14:41]

"Ibrahim was the son of Tarakh. When Tarakh was 75 years of age, Ibrahim was born to him."
al-Bidaya wal Nihaya, by Ibn Kathir, vol. 1 p 139

Al-Tabari confirms this in his tareekh and in his tafseer:

Tareekh al-Tabari, vol. 1 p 119
Tafsir Al-Tabari, vol. 7 p 158

Denying bible does not mean that you deny the facts; If its true – its true.
Not that it's a perfect source, the Bible confirms that Azar was not the name of Ibrahim's father.
Genesis 11:26 states that Abram's (Ibrahim) name was Terah (sim. to Tarakh) and that Abram was born when Terah was 70.

Ibrahim(A.S.) himself was very old when Allah gave him Ismail(A.S.) and Ishaq(A.S.).

[Muhammad Sarwar 14:39] It is only God who deserves all praise. I praise Him for His giving me my sons Ishmael and Isaac during my old age. My Lord, certainly, hears all prayers.

[Shakir 14:39] Praise be to Allah, Who has given me in old age Ismail and Ishaq; most surely my Lord is the Hearer of prayer:

[Yusufali 14:39] "Praise be to Allah, Who hath granted unto me in old age Isma'il and Isaac: for truly my Lord is He, the Hearer of Prayer!

[Pickthal 14:39] Praise be to Allah Who hath given me, in my old age, Ishmael and Isaac! Lo! my Lord is indeed the Hearer of Prayer.

*At that age Ibrahim prayed to Allah: *

[Muhammad Sarwar 14:41]Lord, on the Day of Judgment, forgive me and my parents and all the believers."

[Shakir 14:41] O our Lord! grant me protection and my parents(Walidayn) and the believers on the day when the reckoning shall come to pass!
[Yusufali 14:41] "O our Lord! cover (us) with Thy Forgiveness - me, my parents(Walidayn) , and (all) Believers, on the Day that the Reckoning will be established!
[Pickthal 14:41] Our Lord! Forgive me and my parents(Walidayn) and believers on the day when the account is cast.

In that prayer Ibrahim mentioned his parents (Walidayn) . Ibrahim asks Allah to favour his parents(Walidayn) with divine grace and forgiveness and keep them safe from sinfulness, therefore there is no doubt that his parents were true believers.

To prove this concept wrong:
You must have to prove that Walid is used not only for father
You must have to prove that the word "ab" has the same meaning as "walid". I gave you the reference of Ayat 2 : 133 ] of Yaqoub (AS).

[Shakir 2:133] Nay! were you witnesses when death visited Yaqoub, when he said to his sons: What will you serve after me? They said: We will serve your god and the god of your fathers, Ibrahim and Ismail and Ishaq, one Allah only, and to Him do we submit.

[Yusufali 2:133] Were ye witnesses when death appeared before Jacob? Behold, he said to his sons: "What will ye worship after me?" They said: "We shall worship Thy god and the god of thy fathers, of Abraham, Isma'il and Isaac,- the one (True) Allah: To Him we bow (in Islam)."

[Pickthal 2:133] Or were ye present when death came to Jacob, when he said unto his sons: What will ye worship after me? They said: We shall worship thy god, the god of thy fathers, Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac, One Allah, and unto Him we have surrendered.

^
so u r saying that Allah was at lack of words so he cud not have used a precise word to describe Ibrahim’s (as) relation to azar??? :rolleyes:

why do u have to twist all the history, right up to Adam (as) just to say that abu-talib accepted Islam (which ofcourse history clearly shows that he never did)…

^
"Say, "If the ocean were ink for the words of my Lord, the ocean would run out, before the words of my Lord run out, even if we double the ink supply." [18:109]

These glorious words tell us that God's words are endless, and that if He saw wisdom in adding more words to any Quranic verse then He would have easily done so. For God is NEVER short of words.

Don’t lose you temperament; whatever the intentions behind it; Abu Talib or whoever we must have an answer otherwise we have to accept it.

By the way! Abu Talib was not the father of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH). The question is the father and mother of the holy Prophet Muhammad. It will look better if you say something about the father and mother of the holy Prophet Muhammad not just about Abu Talib.

Stick to the topic and prove that why did Allah use the word (Ab) for non-biological father of Ibrahim (AS), why did he use (aabaa) for Ismail (AS) [2:133] and why did Ibrahim(AS) prayed for his parents (Walidayn) (biological father and mother) when he was very old.

INUIT r u also going to claim tht there is A SURAH missing form Quran al-kareem!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(nauodhoobillah)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by inuit: *
The question is the father and mother of the holy Prophet Muhammad. It will look better if you say something about the father and mother of the holy Prophet Muhammad not just about Abu Talib.

[/QUOTE]

i thought the title meant we talk about abu-talib and not the parents of the Prophet (saw)....
and if azar was "ab" for ibrahim why not abu-talib the 'ab' for Muhammad (saw)????

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
i thought the title meant we talk about abu-talib and not the parents of the Prophet (saw)....
[/QUOTE]
You are right, in this thread initially we were discussing about Abu Talib. If you see, after few posts, since bao bihari wrote this statement "azar was non muslim". We started discussing about the parents of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Parents of Holy Prophet Ibrahim (AS) as a side-line topic. As soon as it finishes we can go back to the main topic. If there is something left to say.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
and if azar was "ab" for ibrahim why not abu-talib the 'ab' for Muhammad (saw)????
[/QUOTE]
He is the "ab" of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH). No body can deny it. All the brothers of Hazrat Abdullah(AS) including he himself and all the brothers of Hazrat Abdual Mutlib(AS) including he himself and so on, were the "ab" of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH). However Hazrat Abdulla and Abdual Mutlib(AS) were in the Walidayn of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH) also. Others were not the Walidayn of Prophet Muhammad(PBUH).

I think it’s adequate for this sideline topic. For further questioning about the main issue, Iman-e-Abu Talib, better if we listen, those speeches which are made by Professor Dr. Tahir ul Qadri. Without listening him it is useless to bring any argument.

^
and exactly where did this Dr. Qadiri get his doctorate from????
and which academic institute has awarded him with the rank of a professor????

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
^
and exactly where did this Dr. Qadiri get his doctorate from????
and which academic institute has awarded him with the rank of a professor????
[/QUOTE]
Hazrat Ayesha said: Don’t see who is saying; see what he is saying.

Brother this question is not for me to answer; if you are querious to find about him better you go through his profile on his website or ask any of his representative. I don’t know even it is there or not; neither it’s my concern.

Rather than asking about his degree and rank; better if you discuss the active topic Eman e Abu Talib(AS). If you have any question regarding this issue I will try my best to help you.

*My only concern is Eman of Parents of Prophet Muhammand (PBUH), Parents of Prophet Ibrahim(AS) and Eman e Abu Talib(AS). So far we have finished that the parents of the Prophets (AS) were all Muslims. *

Best regards,

when u put up anything quoted from someone, u have to know the authority of that someone…
and if u r calling him a professor, u have to know whether he really is one or not…

and so far we have only concluded that for some unknown reasons, people r trying to twist all the history to prove what never was…
Ibrahim’s (as) father was an idol-maker, a mushrik, as Quran tells us…
Abu Talib never accepted Islam, even on insistance by the Prophet (saw) on his deathbed, where abu jehal told him “will u desert the religion of ur father and grandfather” and abu talib died in a state where he had not accepted the religion sent to Muhammad (saw) by Allah…

how do u justify using (as) for abu talib…
i was surprised at (ra) and now its (as)…

next what???
r we going to see Imam Abu Talib (as) as well :rolleyes:

It not me; its people who call him professor; they gave him authority.

This what we are here to find out who is doing it.

We have discussed this issue in detail. Ibrahim’s (AS) “walid” was not idol-maker, he was not a mushrik, and Quran tells us that Ibrahim (AS) prayed for him in his last part of life. It was his uncle “azar” how was idol-maker, a mushrik and Quran used the word “ab” for him which does not only mean “walid”

Such false commentaries and statements were fabricated as a part of the smear campaign which the Omayyads and their allies waged against Imam Ali (AS). By fabricating such traditions they tried these to convince people that Abu Sufyan, father of Muawiyyah was better than Abu Talib, father of Imam Ali, claiming that Abu Sufyan died while he was a Muslim and Abu Talib died while he was a pagan.

Don’t make an issue over an issue; I am still waiting for answer on Just a simple question regarding (A.S.) for Ahle Bait (AS) and those who were not Prophets (AS).

**Instead of expanding the topic better if you concentrate on the main issue. **

^
when will u people ever come out of this "family" piety thing....
in Islam every man/woman is answerable for his/her own deeds....
why cant u evern learn that????
Ali (ra) stills holds the high rank that he hold and th fact that abu talib never accepted Islam, ni my view, has no effect on it....

it was all just a history twist by some group to say "see ali's father was a muslim while abubakar, omar, usman, khalid etc etc came from non-muslim parents"....

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by armughal: *
it was all just a history twist by some group to say "see ali's father was a muslim while abubakar, omar, usman, khalid etc etc came from non-muslim parents"....
[/QUOTE]
Pretty valid point this is.

We have discussed this issue in detail. Ibrahim’s (AS) “walid” was not idol-maker, he was not a mushrik, and Quran tells us that Ibrahim (AS) prayed for him in his last part of life. It was his uncle “azar” how was idol-maker, a mushrik and Quran used the word “ab” for him which does not only mean “walid”.

[quote]
Originally posted by armughal :
when will u people ever come out of this "family" piety thing....
in Islam every man/woman is answerable for his/her own deeds....
why cant u evern learn that????
Ali (ra) stills holds the high rank that he hold and th fact that abu talib never accepted Islam, ni my view, has no effect on it....
[/quote]
This is not a question of "family". You misunderstood it. The question is 'Haq' and 'na-Haq'.

(1) Azar was the uncle (ab) of Ibrahim(AS).
(2) Son of Noah' (AS) was the son of Noah' (AS); a family member,
(3) Noah's(AS) wife was his wife; a family member,
(4) Lut's(AS) wife was his wife; a family member,
(5) Son of Adam (AS) Qabeel was the son of Adam(AS); a family member,

There are lot more many such kind of examples in history.

Every man/woman is not any answerable for his/her deeds but his/her concepts(Aqaeed) also. I would rather say 'Aqaeed' comes first than deeds.

In this context of family please explain the following Ayat and aAhdeeth.

[Shakir 3:33] Surely Allah chose Adam and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations.
[Yusufali 3:33] Allah did choose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,-
[Pickthal 3:33] Lo! Allah preferred Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of 'Imran above (all His) creatures.

A Famous Hadith
I am leaving among you two successors: the Book of Allah, a rope extending from heavens to earth - or between heavens and earth - , and my household (`itra) from my family (Ahl al_Bayt); they shall never separate from each other until they reach me by the Pool."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 6.320
Narrated Ka'b bin Ujra:
It was said, "O Allah's Apostle! We know how to greet you, but how to invoke Allah for you?" The Prophet said, "Say: O Allah! Send your blessings/greetings (Salawat) on Muhammad and his family, the same way as You sent Your blessings/greetings on Abraham's family. You are indeed worthy of all praise, full of glory.'"

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 6.321
Narrated Abu Said al-Khudri:
We said, "O Allah's Apostle! (We know) this greeting (to you) but how shall we invoke Allah for you?" He said, "Say: O Allah! Send your greetings on Muhammad who is Your servant and Your Messenger, the same way as You sent Your greetings on Abraham's family. And send Your blessings on Muhammad and on Muhammad's family, the same way as You sent Your blessings on Abraham's family."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 6.322
Narrated Ibn Abi Hazim and Ad-Darawardi:
Yazid reported (similarly with the following wordings) "...And send Your blessings on Muhammad and on Muhammad's family, the same way as You sent Your blessings on Abraham and on Abraham's family."

Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 8.368
Narrated 'Abdur-Rahman bin Abi Laila:
Ka'b bin 'Ujra met me and said, "Shall I give you a present? Once the Prophet (saw) came to us and we said, 'O Allah's Apostle! We know how to greet You; but how to send Salat upon you?' He said 'Say: O Allah! Send your greetings (Salawat) on Muhammad and his family, the same way as You sent Your Salawat on Abraham's family. O Allah! Send Your blessings on Muhammad and on Muhammad's family, the same way as You sent Your blessings on Abraham's family. You are indeed worthy of all praise, full of glory.'"

Book 36, Number 4269:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Mas'ud:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If only one day of this world remained. Allah would lengthen that day (according to the version of Za'idah), till He raised up in it a man who belongs to me or to my family whose father's name is the same as my father's, who will fill the earth with equity and justice as it has been filled with oppression and tyranny (according to the version of Fitr). Sufyan's version says: The world will not pass away before the Arabs are ruled by a man of my family whose name will be the same as mine.

Book 36, Number 4269:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Mas'ud:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If only one day of this world remained. Allah would lengthen that day (according to the version of Za'idah), till He raised up in it a man who belongs to me or to my family whose father's name is the same as my father's, who will fill the earth with equity and justice as it has been filled with oppression and tyranny (according to the version of Fitr). Sufyan's version says: The world will not pass away before the Arabs are ruled by a man of my family whose name will be the same as mine.

Book 36, Number 4270:
Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If only one day of this time (world) remained, Allah would raise up a man from my family who would fill this earth with justice as it has been filled with oppression.

Ahmad in his Musnad and Muslim in his Sahih narrated from Zayd ibn Arqam, also al-Hakim, Ibn Hibban, al-Darimi, al-Bazzar, and al-Tabarani:

The Messenger of Allah stood to speak to us beside a pond which is known as Khum, located between Mecca and Medina. He praised Allah and admonished us to remember Him, then said: "O people! I am a human being and the time is near when my Lord's Messenger shall come to me (with death) and I shall answer him. Behold! I am leaving among you two weighty matters. The first of them is the Book of Allah, in which is the guidance and the light...And the People of my House. I remind you by Allah of the People of my House! I remind you by Allah of the People of my House! I remind you by Allah of the People of my House!" Huswayn ibn Sabra said to Zayd: "Who are the People of his House (Ahly al Bayt), O Zayd? Are not his wives among the People of his House?" Zayd replied: "His wives are the People of his House (ahly Al Bayt), however, the People of his House (in the context of the address of Khum) are those for whom sadaqa is unlawful after the Prophet." Huswayn said: "And who are they?" He replied: "The family of Ali, the **family** ofAqil, the family of Jafar, and the **family** ofAbbas. Sadaqa is unlawful for all of these."

[quote]
Originally posted by armughal :
it was all just a history twist by some group to say "see ali's father was a muslim while abubakar, omar, usman, khalid etc etc came from non-muslim parents"....
[/quote]
Shibli Numani, in his most celebrated work on the Seera of the Prophet, Siratun Nabi page 221

Abu Talib made great sacrifices for the Prophet none can deny that. He would even sacrifice his own children for his sake. For his sake he had exposed himself to the odium of the whole country, and for his sake he had passed years in state of siege, suffering starvation as an exile, unprovided with food or drink. Will all this love, sacrifice and devotion go unrewarded ?

Abu Talib was a man of great faith and had strong belief in the truthfulness of Mohammed (PBUH&HF). He lived with that mission for about eleven years, and the difficulties for Muhammad and him increased in size by the passage of time. This was especially noticeable after his death, since the Quraish subjected him to more sufferings; sufferings that were not imaginable during the life time of Abu Talib.

The readers of Islamic History know how the Quraish clans delivered to Abu Talib an ultimatum, to stop his nephew from defaming their fathers and belittling their gods and ridiculing their minds; otherwise, they would confront him and the Prophet (PBUH&HF) on a battlefield untill one of the two parties perished. Abu Talib had no doubt that his acceptance of the Quraishi challenge meant his death and total annihilation of his clan; yet he did not pressure his nephew to stop his campaign.

[quote]
Originally posted by Stupid Idiot :
Pretty valid point this is.
[/quote]
How many other valid points you found in this thread; please mention if you found one.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by inuit: *
In this context of **family
* please explain the following Ayat and aAhdeeth.

[Shakir 3:33] Surely Allah chose Adam and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations.
[Yusufali 3:33] Allah did choose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,-
[Pickthal 3:33] Lo! Allah preferred Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of 'Imran above (all His) creatures.

[/QUOTE]

if u read further in the Quran, u can see that the narrowing down of this "family" has been done not jus as family of Adam(as) and Nuh(as), or as family of Ibrahim(as), but as family of Yaqoob (as) i.e. bani israel....

read verse 2:47 and 2:122 as examples....
the same is repeated in many other verses in the Quran....

the famous hadith u reported is fabricated....
the two things left were The Book and The Sunnah of the Prophet (saw)....

i am sure the rest can be explained, but u seem like just wasting ur time and mine by sticking to false narrations....

[Shakir 3:33] Surely Allah chose Adam and Nuh and the descendants of Ibrahim and the descendants of Imran above the nations.
[Yusufali 3:33] Allah did choose Adam and Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of 'Imran above all people,-
[Pickthal 3:33] Lo! Allah preferred Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of 'Imran above (all His) creatures.

[quote]
Originally posted by armughal :
if u read further in the Quran, u can see that the narrowing down of this "family" has been done not jus as family of Adam(as) and Nuh(as), or as family of Ibrahim(as), but as family of Yaqoob (as) i.e. bani israel....
[/quote]
You are doing wrong interpretation of the above verse. If you read it again you will see, in this verse Adam and Nuh are mentioned by their names, whereas Ibrahim and Imran are mentioned with reference to their posterity. Al (the posterity) of Adam and Nuh have not been included in the category of the chosen ones, because there were several ungodly and wicked persons in their lineage, but in the al (immediate issues) of Ibrahim (Ismail and Is-haq) and Imran (Musa and Harun), holy men of God, were chosen as messengers of Allah.

[quote]
Originally posted by armughal :
when will u people ever come out of this "family" piety thing....in Islam every man/woman is answerable for his/her own deeds....why cant u evern learn that????
[/quote]
Why you try to divert the topic
By saying the above words why are you diverting the topic to sideline issues? Seems kind of jealous! Concentrate on the main issue. My only concern is Eman of Parents of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), Parents of Prophet Ibrahim(AS) and Eman e Abu Talib(AS).

What is the main topic
(1) We have discussed this issue in detail. Ibrahim’s (AS) “walid” was not idol-maker, he was not a mushrik, and Quran tells us that Ibrahim (AS) prayed for him in his last part of life. It was his uncle “azar” how was idol-maker, a mushrik and Quran used the word “ab” for him which does not only mean “walid”.

(2) So far we have finished that the parents of the Prophets (AS) were all Muslims. The purity and excellence of the Holy Prophet whose being was transferred from Adam to his father through purified loins and wombs, one after another. A11 his ancestors were believers and true devotees of Allah.

(3) Abu Talib was a man of great faith and had strong belief in the truthfulness of Mohammed (PBUH&HF). He lived with that mission for about eleven years, and the difficulties for Muhammad and him increased in size by the passage of time. This was especially noticeable after his death, since the Quraish subjected him to more sufferings; sufferings that were not imaginable during the life time of Abu Talib.

You are welcome:
And if you have anything to say about the above three issues; you are more than welcome. If you are serious in discussion rather than just giving the reference of Ayat or Hadith while quoting, paste in all 3 or 4 available translations of Ayat and hadith with proper reference, evidence and conclusion.

Side note:
Be responsible; make your post well documented; do some hard work. Your post will stay on internet for long and all the time readers come and see. They do internet search to find about specific topics. Simply denying and running away isn’t in good manners. I have seen many people on internet when they see they have no answer to the questions of opponent (in discussion); they just try to change the topic & never reply. Sometime they change their logins and start the same refuting thing again and again with same other names. Some people on internet just login to buck up; if they see something in favor. And when they see things are turning against their will and thoughts they become just like – 'sum mum buk mum om yom fahum la yar ji un '

[Shakir 2:171] And the parable of those who disbelieve is as the parable of one who calls out to that which hears no more than a call and a cry; deaf, dumb (and) blind, so they do not understand.
[Yusufali 2:171] The parable of those who reject Faith is as if one were to shout Like a goat-herd, to things that listen to nothing but calls and cries: Deaf, dumb, and blind, they are void of wisdom.
[Pickthal 2:171] The likeness of those who disbelieve (in relation to the messenger) is as the likeness of one who calleth unto that which heareth naught except a shout and cry. Deaf, dumb, blind, therefore they have no sense.

Those who cover themselves with the dark veil of ignorance are deaf, dumb and blind. There is no response.

The above three issues are still there waiting for appropriate response from your side or somebody else. And don’t take these things emotional – koie illmi baat karo, agar hay too–