Re: IK involved in money laundering: Kh Asif
Let the people judge if I have tried to justify slightest wrong on the part of the leadership of the party I support over the years including his justification of suicide bombers.
Now on your part..
Doesn’t matter who made the case, pleas explain your position specifically on the points I am going to raise now.
-
Depositing money in the personal accounts of BB/Zardari to the tune of 60 million dollars by Cotecna-SGS. SGS-Cotecna have admitted to this and have already been prosecuted in Swiss courts for this crime. What is your take on this..???
-
Ownership of Surrey Palace was denied publicly in the parliament and media in Pakistan by the royal couple. Later the ownership was claimed in a British court. Isn’t it a clear case of mis declaration in Pakistan when the royal couple contested elections at that time. Moreover the income declared by the royal couple does not justify the means to buy such a precious property.
-
Accounts of nearly US$ 1.8 billion were frozen by Swiss authorities on the suspicion that they belonged to the royal couple. These were later unfrozen due to NRO. The declared wealth of the royal couple is not even a fraction of this. It’s a clear case of possessing assets beyond means.
Instead of firing bullets in the air to create confusions I request you to justify specifically these three points so that the readers of this respected forum can take you seriously and confirm that you are not working on a specific agenda which includes slavery of certain individuals no matter how wrong-evil they are..!!!
P.S.
Only specific answers point by point… otherwise don’t bother to answer with typical Jiyala rants which can satisfy the most jahil readership but will not impress the educated participants of this forum..