Re: If there had been no Partition in 1947.
it is true.
Don't generalize by telling "why do indians"...specifically ask this to thread starter. THe day he started a thread telling "my opinions regarding pakistanis have changed"...(something like that)..i suspected that he will start this thread/will mention these sort of things somewhere. and he has started similar threads also earlier. so, I suggest this thread be locked:)
It is not true because an undivided India would still not have a Muslim majority. Democratically or through sheer numbers, Muslims would not be able to do much.
Also, I was not directing the "why do.." comments towards you. I had a separate paragraph for that reason. I am not going to generalize about Indians. especially when I disagree with your comment about an Islamic India.
On a related note, I have seen many Indian critiques (in academia) about these matters, so it is something that is on the minds of Indians. It is much rarer to see a similar thought by Pakistanis. In fact, most Pakistanis (academics or otherwise) do these scenarios with Bangladesh. Its all done and over with.