If Singapore can do it, Pakistan Can(By Babar Ayaz)

I think if Govt. focus on DIVERSITY, we can do it whatever we want to.

SOURCE: DAWN NEWSPAPER

A Pakistani banker who is working in Singapore is sad. Yes, sad because he feels that what Singapore has succeeded in doing, Pakistan has not, in spite of abundance of opportunities.

He came over to meet me when I was in Singapore last week. We lamented the fact that what a tiny city-state has achieved in a short span of just over three decades we could not. We are not the only ones, almost every Pakistani who travels abroad and sees better managed prosperous countries and cities asks the burning question: **“Why can’t we do it?” **

Indeed, we can do it. We don’t have to reinvent the wheel. We only have to do what others have done right. On my recent visit to Singapore I had an opportunity to visit chemical industries, both were multi-million dollar joint ventures.

In Singapore it was the official opening of BASF-Shell’s $500 million styrene monomer and propylene oxide (SM/PO) plant. This is said to be the largest plant of its kind in Asia. It would be supplying its products to a number of Asia-Pacific countries including Pakistan. There were two lessons to be learnt from the successful opening of this plant.

First, let’s look at the reasons given by Dr. Jurgen Hambrecht, who is a member of the BASF board of executive directors, for choosing Singapore for this project. He underlined: **“Singapore has achieved remarkable success in developing Jurong island as a world-class hub for the chemical industry, deriving the benefit of industry integration and synergy. Singapore is in general a very business-friendly country for foreign investors. The systems are transparent and accountable. It also has the added advantage of an excellent infrastructure and workforce.” **

BASF Petronas Chemicals’ Managing Director, Mr. John Fastier, gave almost identical reasons to us for investing in Kuantun Malaysia. **This $900 million plant is based on propylene from Petronas, the Malaysian oil and gas company, and cracks it further into glacial acrylics acid, butylacrylate, ethylhexylacrylate. It is targeting over $1 billion exports to Asia-Pacific countries including Pakistan. **

Now looking at these projects and the facilities provided by the Singapore government in Jurong and the Malaysian government in Kuantun, I was reminded that in Pakistan for the last 25 years we have been debating on whether to have a Naptha cracking plant or not. The Jurong model is particularly worth studying for Pakistan’s policy makers. Singapore has shortage of land, hence they spent around $4 billion to join seven islands as one in the south of the country and dedicated it as a place for chemical industries. And in the last 20 years it has managed to attract investment worth over $12 billion. Jurong today has some 70 foreign petroleum and chemical companies with an annual output value of US$ 8.8 billion. It employs some 6500 workers.

The beauty of this concept is that all the industries complement each other in one way or another. The port for the transshipment of the products is also part of the Jurong complex. The entire complex is in a way integrated. The raw materials for chemical plants are mostly transported through pipelines. One company handles chemical waste of all the industries on the Island. Realising the workforce requirement of chemical industries, the Singapore government has also established a Chemical Process Technology Centre (CPTC) on Jurong Island. At every point attention has been given to the synergy between various industries based on the Island. One company’s product is another company’s feedstock, a concept, which the German call **“Verbund.” **

Korangi, which has two refineries and a nearby port, could be our Jurong. But what we lack is the ability to make timely decisions, political stability, an investment infrastructure, and above all a safe working environment. “But this is not all,” says Ismail Mahmud, a Pakistani who works on secondment with Vopak, “add to all this the humility with which Singapore government welcomes the foreign investors.” This was very evident in the speech made by Singapore Minister for Trade and Industries, George Yeo, at the opening ceremony of the Ellba plant.

**Now the point to ponder is that Pakistan has ample land, a sizable domestic market and proximity to many countries, which do not produce industrial chemicals, then why have we missed the bus? But it’s still not to late to wake up and work with godspeed. **

ofcourse where there is a will there is always a way. if singapore can do it so can you in pakistan and we in india. but alas! what to do! we want movies with fat men and women in ridiclous dress run round and round singing - they are not singing themsleves but just posing like singing because they cannot sing. and we cheat peoples that India cheated and took kashmire etc is downright. that is why. if singapore also wanted kashmir or all producing movies hundred and hundreds in bolywood etc then they also be backward also!

Pakistan is in a better position to do it. But it will never happen. Free market based economies need an educated populace, a superb tax structure, a deregulated financial markets, strong financial reserves, low corruption, access to capital and an entrepreneurial spirit. None of which Pakistan has. So Pakistan should try to emulate S. Korea, not Singapore

how you can say pakistan better position to do so and them immediately prove not possible so! but i agree with requirements you have stated. but also most important i think is democracy because without people there is no democracy and without democracy no peopel!

Better position than India, if Singapore is to be the model.

India is well on its way to a comprehensive change in economic fortunes. It's scale cannot make it possible for it to emulate Singapore. India can set its own pardigm.

as a singaporeans all i can say that is ..our government is extremly focus and we know waht we want..also we do not have a bribery problem

First of all, Singapore is a small (much smaller) place. Their focus span is therefore much reduced and allows them to plan accordingly. As part of their phenominal growth, they are willing to give up some of the fundamental liberties. They have probably the same political party in power for the last few dacades. They allow their government to micro-manage their affairs (how many kids, where to spit, chewing gum are just some examples). And most of them really trust their government to do the right thing. They don't get involved in many international hot debates (unlike Pakistan), and pretty much just concentrate on themselves and their relations (financial and social) with their close neighbors. Their region, till recently was relatively free from terrorism or other problems.

Due to their size, their infrastructure is small. Due to their location, their shipping port is a valued asset. They don't have a lot of hang-ups and excess baggage carried forward from the time of their independence. They don't have threats of security concerns and Malaysia is like a reluctant elder brother to them.

On the positive side, as sonn77ch mentioned, their government is very focused and are highly patriotic. Their policies have remained consistent over the years which allowed them to yield fantastic results.

Looking at Pakistan, we inherited a problematic history with our neighbor, which means we have to spend an extra-ordinary amount of our finite resources on defence spending. This screws up all our resource allocation. Our history and our geography is something which we can not change.

In addition, our biggest problem is the population explosion. All our development efforts are blown to pieces due to population bomb. This includes our efforts to educate our kids. This basic problem then compounds all other problems.

In my opinion, looking at Singaporean model for growth, is probably overly simplistic for Pakistan. Malaysia is probably more close to our situation, as they faced some of the similar problems we have, and they have done remarkably well.