If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

A mention of a man who played such a major role in Pakistan’s history..

If I am murdered…the ZAB saga!

The story of the murdered Prime Minister of Pakistan

Who among the thirty odd students gathered in a small conference room at Hotel Orient in Hyderabad in 1967 to listen to Bhutto, would have believed that he would reach the top within four years. After the speech, Bhutto told the three students who organized the meeting that he would not forget the favor. All three of them spent time in jail in the Bhutto era. In the same year, Bhutto and Mustafa Khar were climbing walls in the back alleys of Clifton, Karachi to see Bhutto’s Bengali mistress. They dared not use the front doors for fear of being caught. Once Bhutto was in his mistress’s house, Khar would guard the house. Subsequently, Mustafa Khar too spent time in the doghouse.

For some reason, Bhutto never liked people who helped him to the top. His mentor JA Rahim was the first to go to jail, followed by Mairaj Mohammed Khan and many others after him, once Bhutto became the PM of Pakistan.

What Made Bhutto Tick?

He was somewhat of an intriguer and to some a reincarnation of Machiavelli’s Prince. Bhutto had very little experience and understanding of how democracy worked. His unwavering ambition was to get to the top. Anything that came in the way was a hurdle to climb. He showed scant regard for any moral, ethical, or political values. Still, he touched a tender nerve in poor Pakistanis. He went to the poor and spoke about their plight with such passion that they believed every word of it. He traveled to desolate villages and sat down with poor farmers. Those farmers, and now their second and the third generations, still vote in his name.

He never had any close friends. He liked to drink but had difficulty holding his drinks. Often witty, but after a couple of drinks, he was abusive to his friends and colleagues. His party leaders were afraid of his temper and loose lips in his drunken state and he humiliated most of them. When the Zia government was getting ready to hang him, most of them had already deserted him. Bhutto later claimed in his book that even his lawyer, Yayha Bukhtiar, who owed a lot to him, would come unprepared for the cases in both the High Court and the Supreme Court. Often it seemed that everyone within the Zia government or even in his own party wanted him dead. Some wished it secretly, and some like Ch. Zahoor Elahi and the High Court Judge Molvi Mushtaque, openly did everything they could to send him to the gallows. He and his wife Nusrat were on the verge of divorce throughout his tenure as prime minister; she would often spend months in friends’ homes because Bhutto wanted to be with his mistress, a woman who later claimed that they were married. Nusrat, in the end, was the only warrior in the failed campaign to save his life.

The Pakistani elite, the army, and the bureaucracy wanted him dead. Only the poor and the peasants stood with him but in an hierarchical society, the poor cannot change decisions made by the elite.

Bhutto and the Army - The First Round

The only son of a prominent Sindhi politician, Mir Shahnawaz Bhutto, who died before Bhutto came of age, Zulfiqar Bhutto was introduced to the upper echelon of the Pakistani elite by the Pir of Pagara and his wife Nusrat. Bhutto owed his political training to the army generals. He never lifted a finger for democracy or even for the basic civil rights as long as he served the army generals. He left the Ayub Government over his alleged disputes after the 1965 war and over negotiations with India. He presumably was opposed to all negotiations and later vowed a 1000 years of war with India. The same Bhutto also asserted that his first political dream was to become the prime minister of India and he admired Nehru more than he admired any other politician. Some accused him of retaining his Indian citizenship until he was sure of some footings in Pakistan.

Throughout the fifties, Bhutto worked his way up in the powerful sections of the elite; he had begun to understand the power of the army in Pakistani politics. This was a time when many politicians were confused as to what the army wanted. Some thought they could continue to use the army to support them to remain in power. Bhutto had no such qualms. He first got closer to Iskandar Mirza through his Iranian wife who was a cousin of Nusrat Bhutto, and in turn, Iskander introduced him to Gen Ayub’s inner circle. He would invite Gen Ayub and the other generals to his agriculture farms in Larkana, and entertain them in a grand lavishlystyle with procured imported liquor for the army officers.

He never joined any political party and his relationship with the army generals was his only asset in moving up the social and political ladder in Pakistan. His unflinching faith in the army paid off when he took over as a minister on the morning of the October 1958 coup. Later that month while Ayub Khan sent Iskander Mirza packing, Bhutto retained his position.

From 1958 to until the 1965 war with India, his star was rising. He was the most visible person of the Ayub regime. From a minister of an obscure department, he made it to the Foreign Minister of Pakistan. The high point of his career was a speech accepting the ceasefire resolution in the UNSC in September 1965. On return from New York, he found out that he was a pariah in the Ayub cabinet. There was a bitter rivalry between him, Altaf Guahar, a high level bureaucrat and Mohd Shoaib, Ayub’s finance minister. The 1965 war, despite tall claims by the Ayub regime, almost turned into a major embarrassment when the Indian army began to knock on the doors of Lahore. The palace power struggle made Bhutto the scapegoat of events in 1965. There were speculations that he was the architect of the Pakistani policy to send armed intruders in Kashmir and later on, he fully supported the war.

Sidelined during the January 1966 Tashkent negotiations, Bhutto knew which way the wind was blowing. He got an extended vacation before his resignation and ended up in Paris where JA Rahim was Pak Consular. They embarked on writing a new history for Pakistan.

Pakistan Peoples Party

There is no documented record on Bhutto’s strategy in dealing with an adverse army and his picking up of a new career in the opposition. People like JA Rahim or Dr. Mubasshir Hassan of Lahore, who could have provided clues to his strategy, were so bitter in the end that they never wanted to talk about him. They had scratched any goodwill they ever had about him from their hearts and never wrote any account of that period.

Bhutto had three immediate concerns:

  1. He had to deal with the army. Bhutto never wanted to go up against the army but he wanted to oppose Ayub Khan. That required a deft handling of the situation.
  2. He needed to create alliances that would propel him in the feudal political structure but would still keep him distinguished from the run-of-the-mill feudal politicians of the Muslim League.
  3. He was not interested in East Pakistan but the quandary was that without East Pakistan, chances of his getting to the top were zero.

He went around the first two issues by launching a campaign against anybody related to Ayub except Ayub or the army. He lashed out against the capitalists, the feudal structure, the bureaucracy, and the other supporting cast of Ayub Khan. He told the poor to drag the rich out of their homes and to exact the revenge of the centuries. He asked political novices, the vagabonds, and the anarchists to work for him in changing society. In feudal Sindh and in the southern Punjab, he was talking to prominent feudal families to support him. The Peoples Party was such a mishmash of unlikely alliances that nobody but Bhutto knew what the party actually stood for. Before the elections in 1970, Bhutto had created enough alliances to cause sufficient mayhem in society to alarm the establishment and to cause the elitist to hate him profoundly and without any reservation.

East Pakistan was a sticky situation. He probably had not visited East Pakistan more than twice in his entire political life. Neither did he have any sense of how to communicate with Bengalis. Despite his limited knowledge of East Pakistan, Bhutto correctly defined his political strategy after assessing the trends and the leadership that was emerging from East Pakistan at that time, and set up his game plan accordingly.

Around the time when Bhutto’s role in the Ayub regime was coming to an end, a thousand miles away Sheikh Mujib in East Pakistan was putting together his Six Points agenda for the future of Pakistan. The 1965 war had changed many perceptions, paradigms, and equilibria in Pak politics. What Sheikh Mujib came up with was a clear-cut agenda for East Pakistan’s secession from Pakistan. His Six Points called for two currencies, two capitals, and two central banks. In essence, he was asking for two prime ministers, two presidents, and two armies. Astute political analysts, the army, and Bhutto correctly assessed Mujib’s ultimate goal. But having a program and implementing it are two different things. There were still strong pro Pakistan currents among Bengalis. The Bengali middle class was disgusted with the West Pakistan elite, but it was not apparent then that they were ready to break off. In the most likely scenario, Bhutto must have concluded that if Mujib did not succeed the first time, he would eventually get an independent East Pakistan in the next round. Bhutto was willing to wait it out so he concentrated on West Pakistan for his future political strategy.

1970 saw a volatile and feverish election campaign. Bhutto toiled hard for his votes in the deserts and plains of Sindh and Punjab. Sheikh Mujib, helped by nationalistic slogans and a natural disaster, swept the polls in East Pakistan. With two different parties claiming a majority in two separate parts of the country, the stage was set for a brutal contest for the ultimate prize of controlling Pakistan between the three players: the army, Sheikh Mujib, and Bhutto.

Bhutto, after having been ousted from the power in a palace power struggle just four years earlier, was knocking back with a mandate from two important provinces. It was time for him to play his cards diligently and with utmost shrewdness. Bhutto was ready for the game that would eventually make him the Prime Minister of Pakistan.

Bhutto and the Army - The Second Round

Gen. Yahya Khan and his government, behind the scenes had worked carefully to defeat Bhutto in the elections. Many right-wing Islamic parties along with the various factions of the Muslim League were flush with monetary support from the army. Bhutto had very few sources for money. The rumors had him getting lots of money from a foreign government that controlled funds in Pak currency for the food grains sold to Pakistan. The PPP was not the only recipient of that money.

A few days after the elections, Gen. Yahya Khan along with some senior military generals huddled up with Bhutto in his hometown Larkana. Soon after those meetings, Bhutto took a belligerent stand against Mujib and eventually went on to tell National Assembly members to not to show up for the assembly meeting in Dacca or their legs would be broken. Then in a speech in Lahore, he came out with his famous declaration “Idhar hum, Udhar tum.” Within days, Gen. Yahya Khan postponed the assembly session in Dacca causing a violent reaction there. It became clear to all that Bengalis would have a huge struggle ahead of them to control their destiny.

Bhutto’s declaration of “Idhar hum, Udhar tum” was not some burst of emotions but a signal to the army that he would put his neck out for the army. It was also a signal to Mujib about what was to come next. Mujib got his cue and there never were any serious negotiations with the army. The Awami league leadership began to slip out to India and when finally the military action began, most of the Awami league leaders escaped arrest. Mujib was the only leader arrested by the army.

Within a few months, both the army and Mujib gave way for Bhutto to become the undisputed leader of Pakistan. He knew he had inherited a new Pakistan. It was not Mr. Jinnah’s Pakistan any more. It was within his grasp to build the country anew and Bhutto thought he could. When he spoke to Pakistanis for the first time in Dec 1971, he stressed that he would lead the new Pakistan on a different path.

Hur Kamaale Raa Zawale

Sher Baz Mazari reached for Mufti Mehmood’s beard. Nasim Wali Khan, an articulate person and a fine orator, kept screaming - she was calling the Mufti a traitor! Asghar Khan threatened to kill him. Sher Baz, a mild mannered Baloch, was all keyed up. Some feared that he might actually pull Mufti Mehmood’s beard. Mufti, along with Noorani and Nasarullah Khan wanted to sign an agreement with Bhutto but Asghar Khan, Nasim Wali Khan, Sher Baz Mazari and Ghafoor of JI were dead set against any agreement. The opposition coalition PNA, in June 1977, smelled victory and did not want to give Bhutto any opening to wrest the initiative from them. Some in the coalition felt that the continued confrontation would encourage the army to take over. Nasim Wali Khan was looking to get her husband released from the jail and feared that as long as Bhutto was the PM, Wali Khan could not be a free person. The PNA, a hastily put together coalition, was close to bringing the mighty Bhutto down after a violent movement and many forces were watching with delight the drama that played out in the Sihala rest house.

Just two years before the PNA movement, the Bhutto government looked so much like a civilian imitation of the Ayub regime that many thought Bhutto only lacked a uniform. Interestingly, he did have a funny uniform, a Bandmaster’s outfit. It was a cross between a Mao jacket made of brocade with embroidery work on a Sherwani color.

He was at the top of the world. The press had been gagged; opposition political activities were banned. Intimidating Baloch Sardars were in the Hyderabad jail, and the imposing Wali Khan was so frustrated in prison that he had begun to take it out on police officers. For Bhutto, there was no opposition left to boot and the COAS, Gen. Tikka Khan, was a strong Bhutto supporter. Bhutto could not have dreamed of a better scenario. On the downside, life for political opponents had become difficult, as minor transgressions would bring government wrath. Jails in Karachi, Sindh, and the Punjab packed with mostly minor political workers increased the bitterness. As the hatred against Bhutto and his party began to take roots, the resilience and determination of his political foes and the opponents grew stronger.

Bhutto was enjoying his position. He began to move away from his political party and relied more on the bureaucracy for political decisions. The District Commissioners and the IG Police were his eyes and ears, and his government would often encourage civil servants to appraise the local political situation for the central government.
Gen. Tikka Khan completed his term in 1974, he had completely shut out the opposition politicians, and his successor Gen. Zia, hand picked by Bhutto, was considered a sycophant. Jamaat Islami, a religious fundamentalist party that had always enjoyed an excellent relationship with the army, worked to revive its relations. It found some generals sympathetic to the opposition politicians. In 1976, the US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger visited Pakistan. While he praised Bhutto’s skills at the English language in public reception; behind the closed doors, he gave Bhutto a thorough dressing down for initiating a nuclear program.

Kissinger’s mission is known as a browbeating mission with a well-known warning to make a horrible example of Pakistan in the aftermath of, what was termed in the West, the threat of an Islamic bomb.(1)

On the morning of July 4 1977, the English daily Dawn published an article by Selig Harrison(2) spelling out the US displeasure with Bhutto. At midnight, the Army struck and took Bhutto into custody.

Epilogue

Bhutto had an opportunity to leave the country in August/September 1977. He thought that he could work it out with the army. Right after his nemesis, the Punjab high court Judge Molvi Mushtaque, ordered his arrest, Bhutto’s chances of leaving the prison alive began to diminish steadily. From his jail cell in Rawalpindi, Bhutto wrote a book prophesying dire consequences for the country, if he was murdered. The army would have none of it. His last prophecy also died with him.

Ref:
1)Daily Jang: Urdu News - Latest Breaking News update Pakistan - jang.com.pk
2) Selig Harrison at that time was known as an expert on Pakistan. He is now known as N. Korean expert. See his bio:
http://www.uscc.gov/bios/2005bios/05_03_10bios/harrison_seig.htm

Footnote: Some events and stories have no references. However, they were commonly known in Pak political circles. Only the most authentic ones have ben used here.

Times read: 119 Interacts: 3

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Another article..

How they murderedFrontierpost Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto
Major (retd) General Ahsan Ahmed
On completion of five years of his government Shaheed Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto, the first elected Prime Minister of Pakistan, announ-ced on January 1977 that general elections would be held in March same year. No one was surprised as charismatic Bhutto & his Pakistan Peoples Party were immensely popular in the country.
The subsequent victory of PPP was also not unexpected. However it was some “more loyal than the king” kind of politicians & bureaucrats whose misdeeds cast shadow on these results. Even the worst enemies of Bhutto knew that he would have got simple majority without such misadventures on about thirty five National Assembly seats.
When Bhutto sat down with the opposition leaders following street demonstrations, it was agreed that elections would be held in these disputed constituencies. The agreement was reached on the night of 04th July77 and was scheduled to be signed the next day. The information got leaked. General ZiaulHaq the Chief of Army Staff staged a coup de’tat on night 04-05thJuly’77 with Zia announcing that fresh elections would be held within ninety days.
Z.A.Bhutto was arrested & taken to Murree. He was released on 28th July ’77 & he flew to Lahore. A sea of people advanced towards Lahore airport, waves after waves. Inspite of strict restrictions by martial law authorities, hundreds of thousands of people surrounded the airport giving their verdict loud & clear.
The first amongst those arrested on the night of the coup were Masood Mehmood Director General Federal Security Force & Rao Rasheed Chief of Intelligence Bureau. On 06 thAugust’77, Mian Abbas one of the Directors of FSF was also arrested. Zia started a non-stop malicious campaign against ZAB & his govt.
Simultanously, he announ-ced punishments like chopping the hands of thieves, giving lashes on conviction to a number of crimes etc. At least three were hanged in public while number of those who were flogged in public rose to hundreds including journalists & political opponents.
When the public was terrified to the limits, Bhutto was rearrested in early hours of 03rd September’77. He was kept in a banglow in complete darkness & was prevented from sleep as the soldiers kept on marching around with long boots on. He could meet his lawyers after two days. On 05thSeptember’77, he was shifted to Kot Lakhpat jail & was produced before Justice Samdani on 13th Sep on allegation of conspiracy to murder.
This charge was made up using a FIR lodged by Ahmed Raza Kasuri in 1974 alleging that some people fired at his car on night of 10thNovember’74 with the intention to kill him but his father sitting next to him got killed. Kasuri was a mawkish MNA who alleged that his speeches in the parliament annoyed Bhutto so much that he conspired to murder him & instead his father got killed. In fact, he was keen to be taken in the cabinet but ZAB disappointed him as he thought Kasuri lacked the required ability & temprament.
The case was based on statements of Masood Mehmood & Mian Abbas who had become state’s approved witnesses. Justice Samdani gave the judgement that evidence in the case being insufficient & contradictory, Mr Bhutto is to be released forthwith & not to be rearrested unless ordered by the court. He was released amongst scenes of tremendous excitement & joy of party workers & the public.
Bhutto was celebrating Eid ul Fitr on 16thSep’77 in his ancestral home in Larkana when the army personnel armed with automatic weapons entered ‘Al Murtaza.’ ZAB was rearrested against the orders of Justice Samdani under Martial Law Regulation No: 12 which empowered Chief Martial Law Administerator to arrest any person even without an allegation for a period of three months with provision to extend such imprisonment further.
Bhutto ended up again in Kot Lakhpat jail. The same case, in which Justice Samdani had, bailed him out was again produced in sessions court & speedily transferred to Lahore High Court against all norms of justice as ZAB was refused his right to appeal against sessions court verdict if he would have been convicted. He was thus devoid of one stage of appeal.
The election campaign started on 18th Sep’77 & the very first public meeting addressed by Begum Nusrat Bhutto made it clear beyond doubt that PPP would win the elections. On 30thSep’77, Zia cancelled the elections indefinitely without bothering that Agha Shahi had assured the UN General Assembly only two days earlier that election would be held as announced. The party based elections were held after eleven years in 1988 only after the death of Zia.
In addition to the murder charge, more than sixty cases were registered against ZAB. He wrote a hundred page documents in his defence & produced it in the court on oath. However, while the entire print & electronic media was blasting govt propaganda at full volume, Bhutto, s defence documents were not allowed to be published. Later media was banned from even mentioning his name.
The military dictator was scared to death from a civilian politician par excellence rotting in jail on trumped up charges. It is amazing how history is repeating itself in the next generation. Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.
Acting Chief Justice Moulvi Mushtaq was superseded during Bhutto, s rule & had personal animosity against him. It is imperative to note that Justice Mushtaq was also made Chief Election Commissioner while holding the post of Acting CJ LHC.One does not have to hold a law degree to realise that under these circumstances, Justice Mushtaq should not have been on this bench what to talk about heading it. He made no efforts to show his contempt towards ZAB often passing abrasive remarks about him during the proceedings. At one stage, Bhutto boycotted the proceedings in protest against unending personal slights from the CJ.
The other members of the bench included Justice Aftab Hussain having open links with Jamaat e Islami. Justice Zakiuddin Pal was known for his anti-Bhutto views. Justice Gulbaz Khan & Justice M.S.H.Qureshi were bureaucrats. The two judges who had given relief to ZAB earlier were excluded from the bench.
The proceedings started in LHC on 11thOct’77. A large number of well-known lawyers from abroad attended the court from time to time. One famous barrister from UK attended the court in Nov’77 & wrote “whenever some part of evidence given by a prosecution witness started to go in favour of the accused, the bench would stop him then & there.
The typist would not record the evidence simultaneously as the witness would speak but the bench would dictate to the typist when the witness would stop speaking.
The CJ kept on loosing his temper from time to time. If there would have been no political motives & if the accused would not have been ZAB, such a weak case should not have been brought to the High Court in the first instance.”
Due to unhygienic conditions in the jail, Bhutto, s health started deteriorating. He kept on getting frequent bouts of flu & malaria. At one point, he became so ill, he couldn’t attend the court for many days.
As per law, an accused facing the charge of murder/conspiracy to murder has to be present in the court all the time when evidence is being recorded. In this case, however, evidence of fifteen witnesses was recorded in the absence of ZAB due to illness.
At one stage, CJ even held a press conference about this case thus tearing to pieces all norms of justice & fair play.
When Bhutto was allowed to speak in his defence, the bench suddenly announced that proceedings would be held in camera barring the public & foreign lawyers to listen to his defence.
On 18thMarch’78, LHC gave a unanimous decision of capital punishment to ZAB. The time allowed to file appeal was only seven days instead of ninety days allowed under the rules. Begum Nusrat Bhutto & Benazir Bhutto remained under house arrest in Lahore & Karachi respectively.
A Supreme Court bench consisting of nine judges started to hear the appeal. It was headed by Justice Anwar ul Haq who had earlier given the judgement in favour of imposition of martial law immediately after being appointed as CJ. He had migrated from Jalhander (India) just like Justice Moulvi Mushtaq of LHC, Gen Zia ul Haq & Gen Chishti, the right hand person of the dictator. Justice Qaiser Khan got his retirement orders on 30thJuly’78. He was the only judge who was an expert in criminal law.
Although, he could have been kept on the bench as an adhoc judge till completion of the appeal, this was not done because by that time it had become clear that he was hearing the appeal with a non-partisan mind.
Justice Waheeduddin who had shown similar trends got sick. Although he sent a message that he would like to hear the appeal after getting fit, the CJ decided to continue the proceedings without him.
Unfortunately, he remained sick for the rest of the period. ZAB thus lost two crucial votes on the bench.
The military govt published two “white papers” in July & August’78 consisting of one thousand pages & containing a long description of numerous misdeeds allegedly committed by Bhutto, s govt. It was a brazenly open attempt to interfere in a subjudiced case but SC failed to take any suo motto action. Bhutto wrote a massive rejoinder to these so-called white papers, which was smuggled out of the jail & published abroad in the form of a booklet titled “ IF I AM ASSASINATED.”
On 06th Feb’79, SC announced the judgement rejecting the appeal. It was a divided judgement of 4-3. As per norms of practiced law, capital punishment is not given on divided judgements. Of course, the dilemma of the military dictator was that the accused person was Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto, the living legend & founder of Pakistan Peoples Party. If the two judges, who got removed from the bench for different reasons, had been on the bench, Bhutto would have won the appeal by a 5-4 decision.
The whole world was shocked to hear the verdict. Mr Ramsay Clark former Attorney General of USA who had attended part of proceedings wrote in his article “Even if the entire evidence given against Mr Bhutto is accepted, the verdict given is not justified.” Mr Robert Boduetere, famous lawyer of France who also witnessed the proceedings wrote, “Only history will judge these judges.”
ZAB remained in solitary confinement for one year & six & a half months.
The door & window of his cell had no wooden planks or shutters except the iron bars, which could neither stop the mosquitoes in summer nor the chilling winds of the winters in Punjab. These harsh, subhuman conditions affected his health adversely. He lost forty pounds of weight. In addition to frequent attacks of malaria & flu, he developed serious intestinal problems. His gums got swollen to the extent that he could not eat. He had episodes of vomiting blood & bleeding from nose.
The recommendation of a medical board to shift him to the hospital was promptly rejected. In this physical condition, he was made to sleep on a bed with broken iron springs for many months before a mattress was allowed. At one juncture, he was kept in chains for twenty-three hours without any reason.
The entire world appealed for Bhutto including heads of governments of USA, USSR, China, and UK etc. The defence lawyers lodged an appeal for revision in SC. It was rejected on 24thMarch’79. ZAB refused to lodge mercy appeal to Gen Zia & ordered his family not to do so.
Begum Nusrat Bhutto & Benazir Bhutto, still in custody, were brought for the last meeting but were not allowed to enter his cell. They sat across the door of iron bars on a wooden bench, holding Bhutto, s hands through the gaps between the bars. Benazir,s request to be allowed to hug & kiss his father for the last time, was rejected.
The time for execution was fixed at 05:00 A.M. but ZAB was aroused at 01:00A.M. He shaved, took bath, changed clothes & had a cup of tea. He picked up his wedding ring & wore it. He walked to the gallows holding his head high. Standing on the gallows with his hands bound behind his back, he said in loud & clear voice “Let the people of my country & the world know that I am innocent.” He recited Kalama & told his executioner “Let’s get over with it.”
By the time a large number of journalists & cameramen reached the jail at the given time i.e. 05:00am, he was already buried without his widow & daughter being asked /allowed to see his face for the last time. They came to know about his execution through the press like the rest of the country.
The story of the last days of Shaheed Zulfiquar Ali Bhutto is so excruciatingly painful, whenever it would be narrated, the eyes are bound to shed tears like never before; yours while reading it; mine while writing it.
(The writer is former Director General Health,
former Minister Health & Population Welfare Sindh & former Pro-Chancellor Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences Sindh.He is author of two books).

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

What about the countless political assassiantions Bhattu ordered and was responsible for.....

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

fine thread with relevance to his death anniversary.

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

http://www.pakistanlink.com/Opinion/2003/April/25/10.html

Of Civilian and Benevolent Military Dictators
By Saad Hasan

San Jose, CA

A recent inauspicious reminder (Bhutto’s death anniversary) of an ignominious era of our history largely went unnoticed in the public conscious, except for the few diehards. Still dazed and disillusioned as to what could have been. Perhaps the potential was not fully realized, maybe a microcosm of Mao’s Cultural Revolution would have been the ultimate trophy for all of Bhutto’s pseudo socialist disciples (now reincarnated as Kemalist-Secularists). Better yet, a more efficient final solution a la The Third Reich could have been implemented.

Why the harsh and unfounded comparison to the Reich? Well it is only natural as the great “Quaid-e-Awam”, as Bhutto was known to the masses trapped in a cult of personality, had a peculiar fascination with the way the Fuhrer ran the affairs of the Reich. Bhutto’s own close confidant Rafi Raza in his memoirs reveals that, “Bhutto had a penchant for comparisons with Hitler: he would urge Kauser Niazi as Information Minister to outdo Joseph Goebbels, Mumtaz Bhutto in Sindh to be Heinrich Himmler, and Rafi Raza as Production Minister to be another Albert Speer.” Now this is a remarkable disclosure and leaves little doubt as to the lengths of Machiavellian and autocratic pursuit Bhutto was willing to explore, in order to consolidate his absolute power over the country and the masses. Perhaps the inspiration for Bhutto’s comical pronouncement to fight India for “A Thousand Years” may have come from the boastful declaration Hitler had made on the longevity of the “Thousand Year Reich”.

Bhutto was not in any way on the same pedestal of fascist totalitarianism as were the more prolific Mao, Stalin or Hitler. Bhutto was fundamentally a weak and decadent man, who rose to power by charming, rather beguiling his way in the Ayub Khan’s administration. His calling Ayub Khan “daddy “ had its effect and also provided an insight into Bhutto’s insidious acquiescence in the face of the domineering military establishment, not exactly hallmarks of one genuinely concerned with the welfare and enfranchisement of the people, nor one with unique vision and intrepid determination to achieve it.

Nevertheless, Bhutto did belong to a lesser category of totalitarians, the kind that has plagued much of the Third World and in particular Arab nations. Hence, there was a natural affinity between Bhutto and his counterparts in the Arab world, who saw in Bhutto a reflection of themselves and the same despotic and demagogic tendencies. No wonder Bhutto founded personal relationship with the likes of Qaddafi and Arafat, the terrorist extra-ordinaries. Bhutto went beyond these close contacts and in reality stole leaves right out of the books of the Arab megalomaniacs, introducing tactics and ruthlessness unheard of in our part of the world.

His Federal Security Force (FSF) was nothing but a renamed version of secret police active under the command of dictators, despots, monarchs and terrorist across the Middle East and responsible for murder of thousands of their own citizens. Bhutto for the first time introduced intimidation and suppression of political opposition and dissention through violent and sometimes fatal means in Pakistan.

“Twenty-nine month into his reign, by November1974 five well-known and countless other obscure political activists had fatally tasted Bhutto’s brutality; Dr. Nazir Ahmed, MNA Jamaat-e-Islami – shot dead in his clinic in Dera Ghazi Khan; Khawaja Muhammad Rafiq, leader of Ittehad Party – shot dead by a sniper during an anti-government; Abdus Samad Achakzai, leader of the NAP Pakhtoonkhwa of Balochistan – killed in his house in Quetta by a grenade attack; Maulvi Shamsuddin, JUI MPA and Deputy Speaker of the Balochistan Assembly, – shot in his car on his way to Fort Sandeman; Muhammad Ahmed Kasuri, father of Ahmed Reza - killed mistakenly, during an attempt on his son and for which Bhutto was duly hanged. There are numerous other similar incidents that did not reflect positively on Bhutto.

Of the innumerable obscure victims of Bhutto’s terror, one was my maternal uncle, shot and killed in a raid on my mother’s house by Bhutto’s henchman in Karachi, the notorious Inspector Altaf. My uncle’s crime, running a body building club for his “mohala’s” youth, though charged with training and arming terrorists against the government. Altaf met his fate years later, when during Benazir’s reign, he mysteriously committed suicide under some very dubious circumstances

However, as nefarious as the aforementioned crimes were, they did not constitute Bhutto’s worst atrocities. His ruthless persecution of the Balochi nationalists crossed all bounds of humanity. He had the Air Force and the Army in pursuit of the so-called “Balochi separatists”; the only success of these operations were strafing and bombing of innocent women and children of the various Balochi tribes. Thousands, mostly innocent died in the process, prompting the Balochi nationalists to surrender.

Leaders, in particular, heads of states are judged by the specific actions they take and how these actions influence people’s lives. Bhutto’s macro-level debacles and deliberate well-thought out policies were short sighted, ill conceived and reprehensible, as these affected the future generations. This aspect of Bhutto’s deeds is so painful and despite attempts by some to show otherwise, so blatantly obvious that it is extremely difficult to discuss. Bhutto’s mere denial that he did not utter the “Idher Hum Aur Udher Tum” phrase, nor did he tore the Poland Resolution do not effectively discredit these widely accepted and well established facts. Even if one is to accept that Bhutto may have never uttered the infamous aforementioned phrase, he did everything in his capacity to create a situation that would lead to the dismemberment scenario.

Through his disgraceful collusion with the Generals he was able to completely isolate Mujib. Bhutto threatened to break the legs of all MNAs from the West Wing, who wished to attend the assembly meeting, called by Mujib. Bhutto and his cohorts torpedoed any attempts by the Generals in facilitating a reconcilement between the Bhutto’s West Wing and Mujib’s East Wing. A compromise would have prevented Bhutto from satisfying his lust for absolute power, as Mujib’s Awami League had emerged as the largest party in the election. Bhutto further conspired to draw a wedge between Yahya Khan and Mujib and convinced Yahya to deal with Mujib through military means. This effectively alienated all of East Pakistan, and the subsequent atrocities, though sometimes exaggerated, further strengthened the resolve of Bengalis and infused in them the idea of separation.

The less said about Bhutto’s ill-conceived socialist inspired economic policies, the better. In short, his nationalization of industries and private entities across the board, single handedly contributed towards the economic stagnation, which plagues the country to this day. Pakistan lacks an industrial base and remains an agrarian economy, seriously lags behind countries, which were impoverished at the time Ayub Khan had Pakistan on the road to rapid industrialization. At the time Bhutto took over the reign of power, the rupee was valued more or less the same as the dollar, this valuation had been sustained since independence. However, seven years later, when the masses were relieved of his reign, the rupee had devalued thousand percent.

Arguably the most and only well-conceived decision in favor of Pakistan and its masses Bhutto made was appointing Gen. Zia Ul Haq as the Chief of Army Staff. Hence any comments on Bhutto’s merits would not be complete without a review of what this appointment meant and, more importantly, how these two individuals measured up in the court of public opinion. If there was any doubt as to how people felt about the Bhutto regime, the formation of Pakistan National Alliance (PNA), which brought people from diverse backgrounds together, seemed to capture the masses’ weariness of the regime. Suffice to say they were demanding change. All the high-sounding though empty promises of “Roti Kapra Aur Makan” had not materialized, despite the passage of seven long years - an adequate span of time. Bhutto had hardly time from amassing personal wealth and transferring billions into Swiss accounts (still a source for Benazir and earlier her siblings to continue their exploits, which also included the funding for the terrorist group Al-Zulfiqar).

On the other hand was Gen. Zia, a diametric opposite of Bhutto. Eric Margolis in his book, “War at the Top of The World”, remembers Gen. Zia, as”an extremely modest man, and a genuinely religious one. Among pious Muslims, modesty in appearance and behavior is considered a cardinal virtue. Zia had none of the …demagoguery, hard drinking, and wenching of his predecessor, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Zia was widely respected, even by many of his bitterest critics, as an honest man. This was a rare attribute for a politician in Pakistan…where political office was the golden staircase to self-enrichment. Almost uniquely among Pakistan’s leaders, Zia died without leaving his family a fortune.”

The most telling sign of performance and merits of leaders from the Third World is how enemies and benefactors in the First view them. Bhutto was never taken seriously, thus he was heaped with the usual praise, stemming from his academic credentials, and the West never passes up an opportunity to glorify these articulate, charismatic, yet harmless nuisances. But they do fear leaders who are more in tune with the masses, yet crude in appearance and demeanor. Who are not occupied with self-aggrandizement, but possess a local and a wider strategic geo-political vision, nor chameleon-like in the ever changing global political atmosphere, but profoundly determined to the same noble cause from day one to the last.

Gen. Zia was an embodiment of these qualities. Thus he became expandable. Again Eric Margolis, while considering several explanations for Gen. Zia’s assassination, concludes that he was most probably assassinated, under a “secret compact between Washington and Moscow to eliminate the Pakistani leader, during US-Soviet negotiations at Geneva, Switzerland, in spring of 1988, to end the war in Afghanistan.” Furthermore, “Zia had ambitions for Pakistan to dominate Afghanistan, and then to go on to assume the leadership of the Muslims peoples of Central Asia. Neither Moscow nor Washington wanted to see a Pakistani-led Islamic risorgimento. Come to think of it neither did many a fringe elements within Pakistan, which to this day are mourning the loss of Bhutto.

Zia’s contribution to Pakistan do not end here, one need hardly remind that unlike his predecessor, he was able to sustain a six percent growth rate during his eleven years of the so-called “Aamreeat”. However, his greatest accomplishment, the jihad in Afghanistan, which was earlier dismissed by the Americans as not worthy of attention, would always be overshadowed by his greater accomplishment of relieving Pakistan and its masses of the menace and tyranny of Bhutto.

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

^ interesting other side article...the comment about Zia not leaving anything behind made me laugh though..everyone knows Ijaz ul Haq and ..whats his name the present commerce Minister..(Akhtar Rehmans son?) individual net worth is supposed to be in the 10's of millions of dollars...

Military dictators are generally notoroius for helping their family members ..Ayub Khans family achieved the distinction of being in the top 10 richest families in Pakistan ..Yahya an Musharraf (so far) appear the exceptions..

Bhutto's person "wenching" and "drinking" do not make him a bad leader...they make him a bad Muslim..and not a very ethical human being..but again those are not crimes in this world..Churchill was the same after all and don't get me started on Musharraf and his "morality"

The Nationalisation was a major mistake..but again..almost every political party that campaigned in the 1970 elections campaigned on a socialist platform..why? well simple..the crony capitalist system during Ayub Khan had created huge imbalances in wealth which helped trigger the 1969 unrest..no political party with a claim to power could win a seat without campaigning on that platform..

Murders; Many of the murders cited by the article..were never proven to be directly linked to ZAB..although I know of one through my own family which he personally requested the matter be "dealt" with..

I doubt anyone could deny his genius..he was a very very flawed genius..comparable to Indira gandhi or Mujeeb ur Rehman...but one thing he did not deserve was to be murdered...

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Hilter, Stalin, Mao and Mussollini were all geniuses in their own respect.....calling them flawed geniuses would be an egregious euphemism.....

Plus on the question of culpability....Hitler was never proved to have any direct link to the Holocaust.......

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

^ I seriously doubt Hitler was unaware of the genocide that was occuring under his watch. I wonder if instead of mass murdering so many people, if he actually used them for his war effort, he could have won. Killing people so systematically like Hitler did, is a huge waste of precious resources that could have been used to win and conquer Europe.

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Agreed, similarly Bhattu was not in the dark regarding all the killings and brutality that took place under his regime.....

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

You're always talking about Bhutto's crimes. Do you have a credible website which highlights these crimes? Or any book that you know of?

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

CG: I don't think there is any proof of Bhutto being a genocidal maniac...he was cruell..again in what context? Do you really want me to go through a comaprison of actions? Many Pakistani leaders have played roles in political assasination..the Baloch have clashed with most pakistani political leaderships..lets not forget Zia and his army operation in Sind..or Yahya in East Pakistan..how many other leaders were punished like that?

Bhuttos interest in Napolean and Hitler were well known..Wali Khan..leader of the opposition used to call him Adolph Bhutto..(his family suffered horribly under ZABs government) ..even so ZAB did not deserve his fate..

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

masterofall: I won't go into details..but you should ask around about what Bhuto had done to his mentor JA Rahim..and also ask why former amir of the JI Tufail hated the PPP and ZAB with such a vengence..I believe Aredeshir Cowasjee has written how Akbar Bugti was asked to deal with Chaudhry Zahur Elahi (Chaudhry Shujaats father) ..to which Bugti replied "I am not a mercenary"..

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Credible websites??? Hmmm....read some of the accounts of people who were in politics at the time and who worked with Bhattu closely, e.g. his close confidant, Rafi Reza.....Sher Baksh Mazari's "Pakistan: Journey through disillusionment" gives a very good objective account of Bhattu's atrocities.....

Plus read the above article from Pakistan link...it details accounts and proofs of what Bhattu was all about.....His persecution of Balochi tribes alone was a crime against humanity....He is only leader other then Busharaf now, who used his country's own airforce to bomb and straffe innocent women and children (Balochi tribes)....And this is common knowledge....and well established fact...read any history book and it will detail this dark period in Pakistan's history....

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

^ thanks che and zakk

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

You admit his brutal streak, yet you have the audacity to be apologetic for his crimes and deem them ok, since others prior to and since him did it…So if Hitler had used a similar argument by saying that Oh Stalin killed 10 million of his own countrymen…I am gonna kill 6 million jews…it would have been all kosher…

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Zia was a cruel dictator, the biggest jerkwad this country will ever see.

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Now I've also heard that Kissinger wanted ZAB dead and to make him an example and actually told this to ZAB's face, because it was ZAB who told the Arabs to use thier oil as a weapon against Israel and America.

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Don’t confuse genocide and political murder..politics by it’s very nature is without principles..neither is excusable..however your criticism is one sided..i believe whats good for the goose is good for the gander as they say..Bhutto both did many wrong things and many right things..which contrasts him with his successor and predeccessor who only did wrong things..he also transformed pakistani politics creating the first grass roots national political party..

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

Kissinger was supposed to have saidhe’d make a horrible example out of ZAB and Pakistan for it’s Nuke programme..ZAB provided a lot of help to the Arabs in the 1973 war..Pakistani pilots flew against Israeli fighters and were respected by them..for their expertise..

Re: If I am assasinated..the ZAB saga..

If anybody its Altaf Husein who has created a truly non-feudal, albeit limited to one ethnic group, grass-root political party…Bhutto just leaned on this feudal background and brethern in all the smaller provinces of Pakistan to put together an alternative to the Punjabi feudals dominated PML, for the non-punjabi feudals …Plus the disenfrenchized/disgruntled Punjabis in Punjab not in tuned with mundane demeanor of PML filled the ranks as well…