[QUOTE]
Originally posted by UMAIR316: *
This Sehwag guy is too good for the English bowlers.
* He was as good against great South African,Zimbabwan ,NZl and Sri Lankan bowling .**
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Once again India missed the 5th bowler. combo of Sachin,gangs, shewag, yuvraj gave away 66 runs in 11 overs. Packing the team with batsmen isn't going to work against good teams.
[/QUOTE]
Yes... But I think thats a concious decision and Indians are aware of it.I think its high time they should think about bringing in Rateendar Singh Sodhi .That guy is a good all rounder and will balance the team.
I think in next match Indians may bring in Agarkar in place of Laxman.
that was a good victory …
sehwag and dada played really well … :k:
india outclassed the english..nice demonstration from the indians:)
What abt the w/c of dravid. R they gonna stick with him till the wolrdcup.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Moonstar201: *
What abt the w/c of dravid. R they gonna stick with him till the wolrdcup.
[/QUOTE]
I think they will !!!
Andyes his keeping was pathetic in this match !!! even club standard keeping is better than this.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *
I think they will !!!
Andyes his keeping was pathetic in this match !!! even club standard keeping is better than this.
[/QUOTE]
I think it will not be good for them. Being a keeper my self I know that Keping is all about confidance, One catch droped or a few byes given n all the confidance of part time keepers gone. n then u will see keeping like u saw yesterday.
BTW I m very much surprised that when indians have one slot available they still included yet anotehr batsman instead of inculding a specialist bowler. How long batting line up they want .
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Moonstar201: *
I think it will not be good for them. Being a keeper my self I know that Keping is all about confidance, One catch droped or a few byes given n all the confidance of part time keepers gone. n then u will see keeping like u saw yesterday.
BTW I m very much surprised that when indians have one slot available they still included yet anotehr batsman instead of inculding a specialist bowler. How long batting line up they want .
[/QUOTE]
I think they wanted to continues the winning combination.But it would be godo Idea to bring Agarkar inplace of Laxman.
AQ not Agarkar again 
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by andha_qanoon: *
I think they wanted to continues the winning combination.But it would be godo Idea to bring Agarkar inplace of Laxman.
[/QUOTE]
I would prefer to have Laxman and have him bowl couple of overs too ;) but no agarkar yaar.