ICC agrees to convert Oval Test result into draw

KARACHI, July 2: In a moral victory for Pakistan cricket, the ICC has agreed in principle to convert the result of the 2006’s controversial Oval Test between England and Pakistan into a draw from a forfeited win for Michael Vaughan’s men.

“The decision was taken at the board meeting on Wednesday with Pakistan pressing for the authorities to convert the result of the Oval Test result,” sources in the Pakistan Cricket Board said.

The Test was awarded to England by umpire Darrell Hair after Pakistan did not come out to field, following accusations of ball-tampering, in the post tea session on the fourth day, making it the first forfeiture in the history of Test cricket.

“Members of other Boards supported us in our stand that the result should be officially changed to a draw as an ICC adjudicator later found Hair guilty of not behaving properly during the entire episode,” they said. “The Board agreed the result should be a draw,” the sources added.

The source said the ICC agreed to change the result after Pakistan pointed out that Hair had been suspended by the ICC later on because of the incident.

“I can just confirm the (ICC) board agreed to change the result,” one senior PCB official, who declined to be named, told Reuters.

England were declared winners after Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul-Haq refused to lead his team back onto the pitch following the tea session on the fourth day after they had been docked five runs for ball-tampering by umpires Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove.

The ICC board agreed to the change on Wednesday after lengthy discussion at its annual conference in Dubai.

Other PCB sources said all board members, including officials from England, agreed to Pakistan’s request which had initially been made in January.

The result led to a strong protest from Pakistan and the ICC appointed an adjudicator to probe the incident that had resulted in the first forfeited result in tests. The ICC adjudicator, Ranjan Madugalle, banned Inzamam for four games but cleared Pakistan of ball-tampering charges. He also censored Hair for overstepping his authority.

In November the same year, the ICC board suspended Hair from supervising test and international matches for his conduct and he was only restored in March this year after the Australian underwent a six-month rehabilitation course.

“The ICC will make an official announcement after the conclusion of the board meeting on Thursday. We are happy that the members have accepted our point of view that the result should not be given to either team,” one PCB source said.—Agencies

Source: http://dawn.com/2008/07/03/spt3.htm

Re: ICC agrees to convert Oval Test result into draw

Michael Holding, the former West Indian fast bowler, has resigned from the ICC Cricket Committee because he is unhappy with the ICC’s decision to change the result of the 2006 Oval Test between England and Pakistan from a forfeited win for England to a draw.

Source: CricInfo


Does anyone remember what was Michael Holding’s stance during Ovalgate?

Seems like his decision is based after the declaration of ICC.

Re: ICC agrees to convert Oval Test result into draw

wat does Michael holding has to do wid this decision ??

Re: ICC agrees to convert Oval Test result into draw

Isse kehtey hein aik teer se do shikaar. Alhamdulillah, holding is out. Is mein cricket ke liye behtri hogi by the grace of Allah. Insha'Allah he would be replaced by a person (preferably Asian) who is more reasonable and logical in his arguments.

p.s. Btw Pakistan was in total position of wining the match till Hair wrongly accused Pakistan. England should be happy with a draw.

2006 Oval Test still a forfeit for MCC

The MCC, the independent governor of cricket’s laws, has recommended the ICC overturn its awarding of a draw for the disputed England-Pakistan Test at The Oval in 2006. Originally the match was ruled the first forfeit in the game’s history, but the ICC changed the result at an executive board meeting in July.

The MCC world cricket committee, which includes current India captain Anil Kumble and former Test leaders Rahul Dravid, Michael Atherton, Shaun Pollock and Steve Waugh, met on Saturday and Sunday in New Delhi and decided “cricket is the worse for this decision”.

The committee chairman Tony Lewis wanted confirmation from the ICC that the original outcome of the match should stand. “The ICC has no power under the laws of cricket to decide that results should be altered, whether it feels it’s ‘inappropriate’ or otherwise,” the former England captain Lewis said. “The ICC’s decision is wrong and sets a very dangerous precedent. Cricket is the worse for this decision.”

Majid Khan, the former Pakistan captain, said the committee’s decision was unanimous “simply because the rule states that you can’t overturn a decision”. “The result should stay as is,” he said. When asked what the reaction to the decision would be in Pakistan, Majid said “we’ll wait and see”.

The controversy began after tea on the fourth day of the fourth Test when Inzamam-ul-Haq, the Pakistan captain, refused to lead his team back on to the field following Australia umpire Darrell Hair and West Indian Billy Doctrove enforcing a five-run penalty for ball tampering. It was a decision that initially gave England victory and resulted in a suspension for Hair, who was reinstated after an employment tribunal hearing in October 2007, following protests from Pakistan. Hair has since stood down from elite-level umpiring.
Inzamam, who is now retired and playing in the unofficial Indian Cricket League, was fined for four games for bringing the game into disrepute. The team was cleared of the original ball-tampering allegations.

“The board’s decision was based on the view that in light of the unique set of circumstances, the original result of the match was felt to be inappropriate,” the ICC said in a statement in July. The ruling meant England won the four-match series 2-0 instead of 3-0.

“As far as we’re concerned there is no record of any other result [but a forfeit],” Lewis said. “We’re not reversing the ICC result, we’re just saying they had no place to do that. We, MCC, wrote the rules in 1788 and the laws working party now is run by Robert Griffiths QC. Legally, there is absolutely no way the ICC can change the laws of the game, which it did do.”

SOURCE: Cricinfo - 2006 Oval Test still a forfeit for MCC

Re: ICC agrees to convert Oval Test result into draw

Cricinfo - Morgan calls Oval Test reversal ‘inappropriate’

Now the issue on which Butt Uncle should speak his heart out, he is quite …not even a word liken wasiey bateen kerwa loo Butt Uncle sai jahaan baat kernee ho wahaan gadhey k saar sai singh kee tarha ghayab