I have generally noticed

[Sehrysh]

Re: I have generally noticed

@CM

Most issues in life 1 do not need nuances or emotional significance. They are normal and logical issues that require a logical and well designed approach. As for religion, political and cultural issues yes men differ regularly. These forums are openly dominated by men and they argue regularly and viciously. But when it comes life issues they don’t. These very same people in life1 will agree but in politics will be at loggerheads. That can be said for a few of our regular posters.

As for why the one size fits all solution to life and relationships? Don’t look at me I don’t know. But it is an interesting observation. No two men will every get into a spate in life1. Why? No clue but they don’t. Thus this thread and by no means are we men all similar. We differ widely in every aspect of our psyche. Yet we agree on most core issues.

Point for me eh?

Sunshine, it’s disappointing that you would suggest interpersonal relationships are cookie cutter in nature and therefore there’s a universal or single response to resolving all issues arising from said relationships. You give greater significance to world and political events (not to say, those are not important), but your attitude towards personal relationships comes across as dismissive, whether or not that is the case. And so, I respectfully disagree that the issues are either logical or solved by a “logical” (read: unemotional) response.

As for point to you - sure I’ll give a point to you. Yes, most men on GS would appear to be pretty one-dimensional when it comes to Life1 issues and therefore respond similarly, which is in contrast to women posters - but I’ll chalk that up to men and women being physiologically different and more important, that women and men are socialized differently.

Khush?