Re: I am Pakistani but I don’t mind my wife wearing a bikini in public
It’s haram to live with non-mehrams, bil etc.. Look it up on Sunnipath for references..** they’ve also been posted on here a million times before**.. How many joint families don’t have their sons there?
Funny how some Pakistani men get so touchy and angry when this comes up.. If the rest of the world can move out of mummy and daddy’s house what’s so difficult about it for you?? Go on and on about women showing legs but conveniently forget the bil is ‘death’ in Islam..
(And yes, I’m far from the perfect Muslim myself but I can admit when something is a sin or isn’t)
Re: I am Pakistani but I don’t mind my wife wearing a bikini in public
This is 4 debaa. when a girl is out with her boyfriend n dnt mind it, is nt it haraam? Is nt boyfriend, non mehram? When a girl asked thiz question in a thread " what about a boyfriend after marriage" you did not speak even a word, u did nt forbid it, u did nt declare it haraam. And now living with in-laws iz haraam. I agre to what u said about in-laws. But Iz nt it a double standard? Livng with in laws z haram but goin out with a non mehram boyfriend z nt haram. Wah, wah.
Re: I am Pakistani but I don’t mind my wife wearing a bikini in public
i think wearing the tag of islam and not representing the true message of islam, again, comes down to individual interpretations of islam. a certain group may find themselves following a more “devout” islamic representative than another group.
as for an individuals views not correlating with their background.. i guess it comes down to their personality.. or the nonshared environment. equally, it could be that they are trying to adopt a more “open minded” view, going against the grind so to speak. although being okay with your wife wearing a bikini in public is not open minded, just stupid. yes, i’m judging that guy hard right now.
Re: I am Pakistani but I don’t mind my wife wearing a bikini in public
I’m glad that it has gone from sinful living with in-laws to sinful living with BIL etc. It would also be nice if you defined the etc. part.
I’ve seen you use this same line many times here that the fatwa that Deeba is giving is posted on sunnipath or that it has been posted here a million times before. Be that as it may, how about you search and post it here to back up your claim.
I’m not sure where the getting touchy part came from. Are we to take your claims as the gospel and not question them? Must one suffer ad-hominem attacks for not taking questionable claims on face value?
At the time that the prophet SAW said it about the BIL (if he in fact said it) there was no free mixing of the genders either. Well, we, being the better muslims that we are, have no problem disregaring that part of Islam on one pretext or another. Because, apparently, we are better at controlling ourselves than earlier muslims when it comes to complete strangers who incidentally have less of an inhibition to an affair than would a vast majority of BILs. However, we need to take the BIL part quite literally because it syncs with our outlook and contemporary norms. Moreover, it helps if BIL part could be extrapolated to include all in-laws because girls don’t want to have to deal with the guy’s parents.
… thats the next line of counter arguments…just letting you know in advance…
