Re: I am only answerable to the Parliament: PM Gilani
I said in another thread that I would (reluctantly) support judiciary dismissing a corrupt and incompetent elected government but only if it (SC) acted with complete impartiality - I consider it an undesirable but (still) lawful and sometimes necessary step (cf. talaq) and **still much better than the alternative **(a military take over, because when these guys seize power they don’t just come in for a few months, they stay in power for a decade or more each time!! - but that even did not happen in 1993. NS was removed by the then judiciary (under pressure from the army) which I cannot support
The SC has every right to hold the government accountable but they should not be seen to be imparting selective justice (under pressure from others). NRO cases should be revisited but so should corruption cases against others incl. NS and the legendary loan defaulters the Chaudhries
And as already highlighted by Decent, Shamraz etc.