Any debate on religious, sectarian, ethnic, and social issues is now being labeled hybrid warfare (especially if it questions the army’s narrative) and is being dealt with suppression.
Its a vague article IMO. Or may be you can say that our policy is very vague.
For example, the article talks about Indian conspiracies. Fair enough. Now what we saw is that one day there was a attack on chinese consulate by BLA whose chief is reported be in New Delhi. Next day Pakistani FM writes indian FM inviting her to that corridor ceremony around the border.
And in next couple of days, at that ceremony, Pakistani PM talks about border removal, making a union etc giving references of Germany and west. So no talk about Kulbushan , chinese consulate etc
My point is, I believe its being done on pick & choose. When they dont like something they remove it. When they like it they go for it. There is no firm policy.
We have time pass leaders usually hence we have no clear policies. Pakistan lost a lot in WoT but India is considered the victim because of our obtuse policies. I seriously hope Imran Khan doesn’t become a doormat like shehryar khan and his begging for india to tour Pakistan.
As an aside, Imran Khan will probably be taken out by the new iteration of khadim hussain rizvi as his ideal is **Lee Kuan Yew **or **Mahathir Muhammad. **Do you see a big army or establishment making policies in either countries?
I have told it to PTI supporters here but they are too delusional like the trump base to accept the truth.