Human rifgts in Islam

Here are some of the famous writings by Muslim scholars. For example,
Afifi Abdul-Fattah,

On the cover of his famous book, “The Spirit of Islamic Religion,” which was reprinted more than nine times, it says the following, “It has been revised by the committee of Azhar scholars with introductions made by the greatest Muslim professors and judges of Islamic legal courts.”

On page 382 Dr. ’Afifi says:

“Islam has approved war so that the Word of God becomes supreme. This is war for the cause of God (Holy War). Muhammad, therefore, sent his ambassadors to eight kings and princes in the neighborhood of the Arab Peninsula to call them to embrace Islam. They rejected his call. Thus, it became incumbent on the Muslims to fight them.”

On page 384, reads the following:

“Islamic law demands that before Muslims start fighting infidels (unbelievers), they first deliver the message of Islam to them. It was proven that the prophet never fought people before he called them to embrace Islam first. He used to command his generals to do so also.”

Dr. ’Afifi (along with the Azhar scholars who revised his book) boasts that the prophet never fought anybody before he called them to Islam first! Those people fail to realize that human rights emphasize that when you call people to embrace any religion and they refuse to do so, you must leave them alone! You are not to fight them in order to force them to accept the new religion as Muhammad and his followers did.

nobodysaid that Muhammad did not call them to believe in Islam first. We acknowledge that, but we blame him because whenever they rejected his invitation, he fought and killed them. Are these the human rights? Do Muhammad’s teachings make you so blind that you fail to see the simplest principles of human rights? Do you not respect man’s freedom to believe in whatever he wants? Muhammad had the right to call people to embrace Islam and to commission Khalid along with his followers to carry out this task; but he did not have the right to kill them if they refused to accept Islam.

Dr. ’Afifi says that eight kings and princes declined to accept Muhammad’s mission; thus it was incumbent on the Muslims to fight them. Why it was incumbent on them to fight those kings and princes? Is their refusal to accept Islam a reason for the Muslims to fight them? “Yes!” This is what all Muslim scholars say, without exception.

Re: Human rifgts in Islam

A bit confused here,
""But when the sacred months elapse, then fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them and seize them, besiege them and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war). But if they repent and establish regular prayers, and practice regular charity, then open the way for them for Allah is oft-forgiving, Most Merciful" (Surah 9:5).""

Re: Human rifgts in Islam

Explicitly and Clearly, the Qur’an declares (Chapter of Repentance, 9:29),

"Fight against those who have been given the scripture but believe not in Allah nor the last day, and who forbid not that which Allah has forbidden by His messenger, and who follow not the religion of truth, until they pay the tribute willingly, being brought into submission" (p. 182, English copy by Saudi Arabian scholars).

The negligible minority of the believers in this new Faith was soon exiled from Makkah and they arrived in the city called Yathreb which later became known as MADINAH. The Muslim emigrants to Madinah brought their SWORD with them. The SWORD continued to work and its magnetic force continued to "pull" people towards it until the whole of Arabia joined the Faith. Compared to the population of the rest of the world at that time, the Arabs constituted a tiny minority. A fraction of this minority decided to take the SWORD beyond the boundaries of the Arabian desert to the mighty Mediterranean, the coast of Malabar and the far away East Indies Islands. People after people continued surrendering to this SWORD and joining the Faith.

So sharp was the edge of the SWORD! It simply conquered the hearts; bodies yielded automatically. It is the SWORD OF TRUTH, whose mere shine eliminates falsehood just like light wipes away darkness.

It continues to pierce the hearts of countless men and women today – in spite of the relentless efforts by persons with vested interests who like darkness to prevail, so that they may rob people of their good things. Read below the impressions of some who were recently conquered by the same SWORD. They are from different countries, speak different languages and have different backgrounds.

AHMED HOLT: British Civil Contractor, traveler in search of the Divine truth, spent much of his time in research and comparative study of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. He embraced Islam in 1975.

"The SWORD OF ISLAM is not the sword of steel. I know this by experience, because the sword of Islam struck deep into my own heart. It didn't bring death, but it brought a new life; it brought an awareness and it brought an awakening as to who am I and what am I and for what am I here."

AS FOR THE PROPAGANDA THAT IT WAS THE SWORD OF STEEL, THAT IS, FORCE, WHICH WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN THE UNIVERSAL EXPANSION OF ISLAM, WE GIVE BELOW QUOTATIONS FROM THE WRITINGS OF SOME OF THE PROMINENT NON-MUSLIM SCHOLARS AND LEADERS REFUTING THIS BASELESS ACCUSATION.

  1. M. K. GANDHI: "...I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and his own mission. These, and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every trouble." YOUNG INDIA, 1924

  2. DE LACY O'LEARY: "History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslim, sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated." ISLAM AT CROSSROADS, London, 1923, p. 8

  3. JAMES A. MICHENER: "No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam...The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the sword. But no modern scholar accepts that idea, and the Qur'an is explicit in support of the freedom of conscience." ISLAM – THE MISUNDERSTOOD RELIGION, READERS' DIGEST (American Edition) May 1955

Whilst not a single muslim set foot in Indonesia yet, it is the largest muslim country today. this is in line with the command of the Qur'an :

''* Let there be no compulsion in religion : Truth stands out clear from error: whoever rejects false deities and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold that never breaks. And Allah hears and knows all things. Allah is the protector of those have faith: From the depths of darkness he leads them forth into light. Of those who reject faith the patrons are the false deities, from light they will lead them forth into depths of darkness. They will be companions of the fire, to dwell therein forever. * ''
(Qur'an 2:256-257)

Thanks for sharing the infor Ahmad22

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ahmed22: *
Whilst not a single muslim set foot in Indonesia yet, it is the largest muslim country today. this is in line with the command of the Qur'an :

''* Let there be no compulsion in religion : Truth stands out clear from error: whoever rejects false deities and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold that never breaks. And Allah hears and knows all things. Allah is the protector of those have faith: From the depths of darkness he leads them forth into light. Of those who reject faith the patrons are the false deities, from light they will lead them forth into depths of darkness. They will be companions of the fire, to dwell therein forever. * ''
(Qur'an 2:256-257)
[/QUOTE]

If you READ this verse you will find a clear and present THREAT. And it is contradictory in itself. "Let there be no compulsion in religion" and ""Of those who reject faith the patrons are the false deities, from light they will lead them forth into depths of darkness. They will be companions of the fire, to dwell therein forever. "'' This is not the only verse in Quran which threaten people of grave consequeces if they don't accept islam.

:stupid:

No Problem. :k: