http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/12/htconexplusattreviewlead01.jpg We just love HTC’s One X here at Engadget – it’s quite possibly our favorite smartphone of 2012. Three devices have crossed our desks over the past year – the original with HSPA+, AT&T’s model with LTE and, more recently, the global One X+ with HSPA+. Now the saga continues with AT&T selling its own version of the One X+ with LTE on board. What’s different between these handsets? How does AT&T’s $200 variant stack up against its global counterpart? Is it worth spending an additional $100 (or more) for AT&T’s One X+ versus the original One X? Does the bump in storage (64GB vs. 16GB) make up for the lack of color options? Find out after the break. Gallery: HTC One X+ review
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/dsc0826_thumbnail.jpghttp://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/dsc0832_thumbnail.jpghttp://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/dsc0836_thumbnail.jpghttp://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/dsc0837-1351509209_thumbnail.jpghttp://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/10/dsc0838_thumbnail.jpg
Continue reading HTC One X+ for AT&T: what’s different?
Filed under: Cellphones, Mobile, HTC, AT&T
Comments