This is the third time India has conceded about 300 runs against Bangladesh, England and South Africa. The Bangladesh game they won, but they did get a bit of a hiding. If you look at other matches in this group, particularly against each other, they havent been very high scoring ones. Now everyone admits that India’s batting is good, but is the bowling really this bad that teams that are usually struggling to get to 200 against each other are consecutively overhauling 300 or more targets?
Alternatively Indian matches could have been scheduled to ensure that they’re on flat decks suited for their kind of batting. Which is it.. clever scheduling or rubbish bowling? Seeing the relative success of Zaheer Khan do Indian supporters here