[QUOTE]
Why do have to be blinded in seeing things. Watch it again, the majority did not support the Muslim girl. Most were quiet, some brave and sane people spoke up in her favor.
[/QUOTE]
It was a television program. The encounters they showed were edited. What were the raw numbers? When they did the segment on Mexicans they showed a few who spoke out, a few who supported the racist, and a few who were silent. At the end they showed the raw numbers and a majority actually spoke up (some said they would never shop at that deli again). The number of people who supported the bigot was a small minority. They did this over several hours, not a 7 minute segment involved five people.
Ah, read the comments in response to the video. The ratio was 13-6 against bigotry with 22 silent. Moreover, this was in Texas. Texas is among the more racist states in the country. The Mexican segment was in New Jersey. There a majority, or at least a plurality, spoke up against the bigot. It was larger than the silent group.
Another factor in this is she was dressed as a conservative Muslim. The ratio would be even better for a regular Muslim, like the one in the video with a white friend.
Two other things: there is a generation gap on matters of race in America. Each generation is more tolerant than the previous one (constant positive evolution!), especially in the South. It is not surprising that the largest bigot in the video was a guy who grew up when the South had racial apartheid against blacks. In addition to the regional difference, there is a difference between a suburb of, say, Chicago and a rural town in southern Illinois. The reason being that metropolitan areas are more diverse, hence slightly more tolerant since you have more contact with people of various ethnic and religious groups. This program was apparently set in a rural town in the most racist region of the country.
I am not a scholar on sociology but I, in addition to having lived here all my life, have done substantial research on the race problem in America. I've read books, articles, numerous polls and surveys on it. I have compared the situation here to that in other countries. Canada is close to the US but the UK and France are far more racist than the US and Canada. Then there are the ultra-racist societies of the East such as Japan, China, Saudi Arabia, and yes, Pakistan. A Pakistani in the local "community" got married to a black woman. The reaction to it was appalling. Most people denounced it in strictly racist terms (I was surprised that no one complained that he did not get an "arranged" marriage or that he married someone who probably is not a Muslim. They say she converted, but every time a Muslim marries a non-Muslim in the West that I know of the non-Muslim is pressured into claiming she or he converted. I doubt it happens in each case but it is revealing that the pressure always comes from the Muslim side. You never see a Muslim say he became a Christian in an inter-religious marriage). On the plus side, the whiners were all 50+ years old and immigrants. Those of us who grew up in the US didn't care at all about her color.
I am not saying there are no problems here but it is a lie and more Islamist propaganda to say that Muslims are persecuted in the US. I don't expect aaho to respond to the facts I put on the table because this is about an agenda, not about opposing bigotry. Where are Islamists on discrimination in their own countries? They complain about France or the UK and yet say nothing--and actually Islamists usually support it--discrimination against minorities in Muslim countries. For instance, has a leader of Jammat Islami ever come out for repealing Ordinance XX?
Edit: I have to credit you, erudition, for admitting there is a problem with the treatment of minority Muslim sects, although I am not sure whether you classify Ahmadiyas as Muslim.